journal article·2019-04-22Open access

Toward Low-Cost 4-Terminal GaAs//Si Tandem Solar Cells

Kaitlyn T. VanSant, John Simon, John F. Geisz, Emily L. Warren, Kevin L. Schulte, Aaron J. Ptak, Michelle S. Young, Michael Rienäcker, Henning Schulte-Huxel, Robby Peibst, Adele C. Tamboli

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 2· Issue 4

Abstract

Mechanically stacked III–V-on-Si (III–V//Si) tandem solar cells have demonstrated efficiencies beyond what can theoretically be achieved by single junction Si solar cells, but III–V costs are currently at least an order of magnitude higher than Si costs. Recent techno-economic analysis shows that costs could be substantially reduced by replacing traditional metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) with a lower-cost III–V deposition technique, such as hydride vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE). This study analyzes the performance of an HVPE-grown GaAs top cell incorporated into a 4-terminal (4T) GaAs//Si tandem cell that achieved an efficiency of 29%, which is the highest solar cell efficiency fabricated without expensive deposition techniques such as MOVPE or MBE. We compare these results to an MOVPE-grown GaAs//Si tandem cell that has the same structure. Finally, we model optimizations to the HVPE-grown GaAs top cell and provide a near-term pathway to 31.4% efficiency with a low-cost III–V deposition technique.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: solar cell performance optimization · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

Institute for Solar Energy Research in Hamelin, 31860 Emmerthal, Germany

Funding

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pip.290910.1002/pip.2909 ↗
2. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.282402410.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2824024 ↗
3. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.14410.1038/nenergy.2017.144 ↗
4. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.239514010.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2395140 ↗
5. Horowitz, K.; Remo, T.; Smith, B.; Ptak, A. J. A Techno-Economic Analysis and Cost Reduction Roadmap for III-V Solar Cells; Technical Report for National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, November 2018; https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/72103.pdf.10.2172/1484349 ↗
6. 10.1002/pip.302710.1002/pip.3027 ↗
7. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.281491910.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2814919 ↗
8. 10.1016/0022-0248(89)90082-110.1016/0022-0248(89)90082-1 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.501313610.1063/1.5013136 ↗
10. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.249336510.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2493365 ↗
11. 10.1515/ehs-2014-001210.1515/ehs-2014-0012 ↗
12. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.262984010.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2629840 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-018-0125-010.1038/s41560-018-0125-0 ↗
14. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.254974610.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2549746 ↗
15. 10.1109/PVSC.1988.10580310.1109/PVSC.1988.105803 ↗
16. 10.1146/annurev.ms.08.080178.00044510.1146/annurev.ms.08.080178.000445 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.02010.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.020 ↗
18. 10.1109/PVSC.2017.836649110.1109/PVSC.2017.8366491 ↗
19. Rienäcker M. · 33rd Proceedings of the EUPVSEC · 2017 · 1
20. 10.1063/1.481683710.1063/1.4816837 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.479826710.1063/1.4798267 ↗
22. SunSolve. https://www.pvlighthouse.com.au/sunsolve (accessed Dec 12, 2018).
23. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.234249110.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2342491 ↗
24. 10.1515/green-2011-001810.1515/green-2011-0018 ↗