journal article·2020-02-24Open access

Aluminum Metal–Organic Framework Triggers Carbon Dioxide Reduction Activity

Michelle Lee, Alberto De Riccardis, Roman V. Kazantsev, Jason K. Cooper, Aya K. Buckley, Paul W. W. Burroughs, David M. Larson, Giuseppe Mele, Francesca M. Toma

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 3· Issue 2

Abstract

Confinement of metal centers is a powerful tool to manipulate reactivity and tune selectivity in chemical transformations. While aluminum as a foil is inactive for carbon dioxide reduction and shows high selectivity for the hydrogen evolution reaction, here we show that aluminum confined in a metal–organic framework (MOF), MIL-53(Al), suppresses hydrogen evolution reaction activity and enhances carbon dioxide reduction. This aluminum MOF can produce up to 40% faradaic efficiency for carbon monoxide and formic acid. This study demonstrates that the unique reaction environment created by the MOF enables changes in reaction selectivity and can impart atypical catalytic capabilities to metals.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States

Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, via Arnesano, 73100 Lecce, Italy

Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Funding

Office of Science

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aad308710.1126/science.aad3087 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10562-014-1436-910.1007/s10562-014-1436-9 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.aad499810.1126/science.aad4998 ↗
4. 10.1021/jp970284i10.1021/jp970284i ↗
5. 10.1039/c2ee21234j10.1039/c2ee21234j ↗
6. 10.1246/bcsj.63.245910.1246/bcsj.63.2459 ↗
7. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0451510.1021/acscatal.8b04515 ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.9b0073310.1021/jacs.9b00733 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6MH00484A10.1039/C6MH00484A ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20160042310.1002/aenm.201600423 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41563-018-0033-510.1038/s41563-018-0033-5 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja210811810.1021/ja2108118 ↗
13. 10.1021/ja511403t10.1021/ja511403t ↗
14. 10.1021/jacs.5b1236610.1021/jacs.5b12366 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20170942010.1002/anie.201709420 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0057410.1021/acsenergylett.6b00574 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.aac834310.1126/science.aac8343 ↗
18. 10.1039/C6DT01282E10.1039/C6DT01282E ↗
19. 10.1002/chem.20030541310.1002/chem.200305413 ↗
20. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0239910.1021/acscatal.5b02399 ↗
21. NIST X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000.
22. Takeno, N. Atlas of Eh-pH diagrams: Intercomparison of thermodynamic databases; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology: Tokyo, 2005.
23. 10.1016/B978-0-08-096665-6.00024-610.1016/B978-0-08-096665-6.00024-6 ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.5b0821210.1021/jacs.5b08212 ↗
25. Hori Y. · 2008 · 8910.1007/978-0-387-49489-0_3 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.6b0853410.1021/jacs.6b08534 ↗
27. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0068710.1021/acscatal.7b00687 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja303560c10.1021/ja303560c ↗