Antipoisoning Nickel–Carbon Electrocatalyst for Practical Electrochemical CO2 Reduction to CO
Source abstract
Abstract
The feasibility of utilizing electrochemical reduction of CO2 (CO2RR) to close the global carbon cycle is hindered by the absence of practical electrocatalysts that can be adopted in large CO2 emitting sources with impurities. To address this, we use density functional theory (DFT) calculations to design a strategy to develop Ni coordinated graphitic carbon shells (referred as Ni@NC-900) catalyst. This strategy not only prolongs stability and endows antipoisoning properties of the catalyst but also reforms the electronic structure of the outer graphitic carbon shell to make it active for CO2RR. As a result, Ni@NC-900 demonstrates a high conversion of CO2 to CO with a Faradaic efficiency (FECO) of 96% and a partial current density for CO (jCO) of ∼−17 mA cm–2 at an applied potential of −1 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). This activity can be further scaled up to attain a jCO of ∼30 mA cm–2 for 18 h at a cell voltage of 2.6 V in a high-throughput continuous gas diffusion electrode (GDE) system. In addition to exhibiting high activity and stability, Ni@NC-900 displays exceptional tolerance toward impurities (from SOx, NOx, CN–), highlighting the suitability of these rationally designed catalysts for large-scale application in fossil-fuel based power plants.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Particles and Catalysis Research Laboratory, School of Chemical Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia
Integrated Materials Design Laboratory, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
Funding
Australian Research Council · University of New South Wales
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C7GC00398F10.1039/C7GC00398F ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20150476610.1002/adma.201504766 ↗
3. 10.1021/ja309317u10.1021/ja309317u ↗
4. 10.1126/science.120978610.1126/science.1209786 ↗
5. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0060210.1021/acscatal.5b00602 ↗
6. Hori, Y. Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry; Vayenas, C. G., White, R. E., Gamboa-Aldeco, M. E., Eds. Springer: New York, 2008; pp 89–189.
7. 10.1039/C8SC03732A10.1039/C8SC03732A ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20170661710.1002/adma.201706617 ↗
9. Jiang S. P. · Appl. Catal. B Environ. · 2018 · 243 · 294
10. 10.1002/adma.20187008810.1002/adma.201870088 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.00110.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.001 ↗
12. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0102210.1021/acscatal.8b01022 ↗
13. 10.1039/C8SC03732A10.1039/C8SC03732A ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-017-01035-z10.1038/s41467-017-01035-z ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.7b0273610.1021/jacs.7b02736 ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20160215810.1002/smll.201602158 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41560-017-0078-810.1038/s41560-017-0078-8 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.09.01410.1016/j.chempr.2017.09.014 ↗
19. 10.1039/C7EE03245E10.1039/C7EE03245E ↗
20. 10.1039/C8EE02662A10.1039/C8EE02662A ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20180688410.1002/adfm.201806884 ↗
22. 10.1039/C8EE00133B10.1039/C8EE00133B ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.7b0907410.1021/jacs.7b09074 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja505777v10.1021/ja505777v ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.6b0935110.1021/jacs.6b09351 ↗
26. Azzi, M.; Day, S.; French, D.; Halliburton, B.; Element, A.; Farrell, O.; Feron, P. Impact of Flue Gas Impurities on Amine - Based PCC Plants Final Report; Newcastle, 2013. 1–63.
27. 10.1002/anie.20170372010.1002/anie.201703720 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0107910.1021/acsnano.5b01079 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0412310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04123 ↗
30. 10.1002/adsu.20180006410.1002/adsu.201800064 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0205210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02052 ↗
32. 10.1038/nchem.109510.1038/nchem.1095 ↗
33. 10.1351/pac19825411220110.1351/pac198254112201 ↗
34. 10.1073/pnas.122232511010.1073/pnas.1222325110 ↗
35. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0257310.1021/acscatal.6b02573 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20160063610.1002/adfm.201600636 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0107910.1021/acsnano.5b01079 ↗
38. 10.1038/nnano.2015.4810.1038/nnano.2015.48 ↗
39. 10.1021/nl061702a10.1021/nl061702a ↗
40. 10.1038/s41557-018-0100-110.1038/s41557-018-0100-1 ↗
41. 10.1021/jacs.8b1369510.1021/jacs.8b13695 ↗
42. 10.1038/ncomms431710.1038/ncomms4317 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b0011210.1021/acs.accounts.9b00112 ↗
44. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0013810.1021/acscatal.8b00138 ↗
45. 10.1002/aenm.20170134310.1002/aenm.201701343 ↗
46. 10.1038/ncomms1363810.1038/ncomms13638 ↗
47. 10.1021/jp500781v10.1021/jp500781v ↗
48. 10.1038/nnano.2012.7210.1038/nnano.2012.72 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0140910.1021/acsenergylett.8b01409 ↗
50. 10.1002/adma.20180827610.1002/adma.201808276 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.10310.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.103 ↗
52. 10.1002/anie.20180838310.1002/anie.201808383 ↗
53. Last G. · US Dept. Energy · 2011 · 38
54. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0033110.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00331 ↗
55. 10.1021/jacs.6b1071010.1021/jacs.6b10710 ↗