journal article·2020-03-23

Ti3C2Tx/Graphene Oxide Free-Standing Membranes as Modified Separators for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with Enhanced Rate Performance

Pei Liu, Long Qu, Xiaolu Tian, Yikun Yi, Jiexiang Xia, Tao Wang, Jianzhong Nan, Pu Yang, Te Wang, Binren Fang, Mingtao Li, Bolun Yang

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 3· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Lithium–sulfur batteries are considered as the most promising candidate for next-generation energy storage devices. However, they are subjected to the “shuttle effect” of soluble lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). Herein, a free-standing membrane composed of two-dimensional MXene material (Ti3C2Tx) and graphene oxide (GO) is synthesized by a simple vacuum-filtration method. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy are carried out to determine structure, morphology, and composition of the Ti3C2Tx/GO composite membrane, respectively. As a functional layer of trapping LiPS species, the Ti3C2Tx/GO composite membrane and commercial polypropylene (PP) are successfully assembled to be a hybrid separator, Ti3C2Tx/GO@PP, to suppress the shuttle effect of LiPSs. The porous and rough surface of the Ti3C2Tx/GO composite membrane is beneficial to improve the wettability of the commercial separator in an ether-based electrolyte. The cells with the Ti3C2Tx/GO@PP hybrid separator exhibit a low polarization potential of 0.26 V in the conversion from Li2S4 to Li2S2/Li2S and deliver a discharge capacity of 640.0 mA h g–1 for 5 C rate, indicating that the hybrid separator benefits the rate performance. According to the results of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, increased discharge capacity is attributed to the reduced internal resistance and intensified Li+ diffusion. The results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy focusing on the surfaces of both sides of the hybrid separator indicate that the shuttle effect of LiPSs is suppressed through a coefficient of the terminated groups’ catalytic conversion on long-chain LiPSs and the titanium-reactive centers’ Lewis acid–base pairs on short-chain LiPSs. Combining with digital photographs of the H-type electrolytic cell, the results of UV–visible absorption spectroscopy suggest that the concentration of long-chain polysulfides declines instantly under the redox effect of the terminated groups on Ti3C2Tx surfaces and then infiltrate through the hybrid separator by virtue of concentration difference impetus. Generally, a Ti3C2Tx/GO@PP hybrid separator restrains LiPS diffusion and improves the rate performance of Li–S batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · MXene and MAX Phase Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Institute for Energy Research, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, P. R. China

School of Environment and Architecture, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, China

Guangdong Xi’an Jiaotong University Academy, Foshan, Guangdong 528300, China

Funding

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province · Shaanxi Province

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Nagaura T. · Prog. Batteries Sol. Cells · 1990 · 9 · 209
2. 10.1021/cr500062v10.1021/cr500062v ↗
3. 10.1039/c3ee43182g10.1039/c3ee43182g ↗
4. 10.1002/anie.20130476210.1002/anie.201304762 ↗
5. 10.1002/cssc.20180244910.1002/cssc.201802449 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms216310.1038/ncomms2163 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20130287710.1002/adma.201302877 ↗
8. 10.1038/nmat246010.1038/nmat2460 ↗
9. 10.1021/nn503985s10.1021/nn503985s ↗
10. 10.1021/nn501284q10.1021/nn501284q ↗
11. 10.1002/aenm.20130147310.1002/aenm.201301473 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20120068910.1002/adfm.201200689 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20130157910.1002/adma.201301579 ↗
14. 10.1021/ja308170k10.1021/ja308170k ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20170053710.1002/aenm.201700537 ↗
16. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.7610.1038/nenergy.2017.76 ↗
17. 10.1002/cssc.20130128710.1002/cssc.201301287 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20140289310.1002/adma.201402893 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.6b0619010.1021/acsami.6b06190 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.11410.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.114 ↗
21. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.9410.1038/nenergy.2016.94 ↗
22. 10.1039/c6ta00483k10.1039/c6ta00483k ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20170748310.1002/adma.201707483 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20160256710.1002/aenm.201602567 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.13910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.139 ↗
26. 10.1039/c6nr02345b10.1039/c6nr02345b ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.6b0457810.1021/acsami.6b04578 ↗
28. 10.1039/c9ta00212j10.1039/c9ta00212j ↗
29. 10.1039/c6ta07198h10.1039/c6ta07198h ↗
30. 10.1039/c5ta05053g10.1039/c5ta05053g ↗
31. 10.1002/celc.20160057910.1002/celc.201600579 ↗
32. 10.1021/nl404721h10.1021/nl404721h ↗
33. 10.1039/c7ee01047h10.1039/c7ee01047h ↗
34. 10.1002/smll.20160253910.1002/smll.201602539 ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20150148010.1002/aenm.201501480 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10403010.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104030 ↗
37. 10.1021/ja308463r10.1021/ja308463r ↗
38. 10.1002/smll.20170341910.1002/smll.201703419 ↗
39. 10.1002/anie.20141017410.1002/anie.201410174 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.00810.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.008 ↗
41. 10.1002/adma.20110230610.1002/adma.201102306 ↗
42. 10.1002/adma.20150470510.1002/adma.201504705 ↗
43. 10.1103/physrev.56.97810.1103/physrev.56.978 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.6b0748710.1021/acsami.6b07487 ↗
45. 10.1039/c2cc33945e10.1039/c2cc33945e ↗
46. John M. C. P. · 2007 · 147
47. 10.1021/ic00010a00810.1021/ic00010a008 ↗
48. 10.1021/ja212192610.1021/ja2121926 ↗