journal article·2022-04-25Open access

A Mediated Li–S Flow Battery for Grid-Scale Energy Storage

Melissa L. Meyerson, Samantha G. Rosenberg, Leo J. Small

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 5· Issue 4

Abstract

Lithium-sulfur is a “beyond-Li-ion” battery chemistry attractive for its high energy density coupled with low-cost sulfur. Expanding to the MWh required for grid scale energy storage, however, requires a different approach for reasons of safety, scalability, and cost. Here we demonstrate the marriage of the redox-targeting scheme to the engineered Li solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), enabling a scalable, high efficiency, membrane-less Li-S redox flow battery. In this hybrid flow battery architecture, the Li anode is housed in the electrochemical cell, while the solid sulfur is safely kept in a separate catholyte reservoir and electrolyte is pumped over the sulfur and into the electrochemical cell. Electrochemically facile decamethyl ferrocene and cobaltocene are chosen as redox mediators to kick-start the initial reduction of solid S into soluble polysulfides and final reduction of polysulfides into solid Li2S, precluding the need for conductive carbons. On the anode side, a LiI and LiNO3 pretreatment strategy encourages a stable SEI and lessens capacity fade, avoiding use of ion-selective separators. Complementary materials characterization confirms the uniform distribution of LiI in the SEI, while SEM confirms the presence of lower surface area globular Li deposition and UV-Vis corroborates evolution of the polysulfide species. Equivalent areal loadings of up to 50 mgS cm-2 (84 mAh cm-2) are demonstrated, with high capacity and voltage efficiency at 1-2 mgS cm-2 (973 mAh gS-1 and 81.3% VE in static cells and 1142 mAh gS-1 and 86.9% VE in flow cells). These results imply that the fundamental Li-S chemistry and SEI engineering strategies can be adapted to the hybrid redox flow battery architecture, obviating the need for ion-selective membranes or flowing carbon additives, and offering a potential pathway for inexpensive, scalable, safe, MWh scale Li-S energy storage.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced battery technologies research · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, United States

Funding

National Nuclear Security Administration

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.10210.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.102 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.12.02410.1016/j.ensm.2018.12.024 ↗
3. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0044910.1021/acscentsci.0c00449 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20210127510.1002/adma.202101275 ↗
5. 10.1039/C8TA09059A10.1039/C8TA09059A ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.08110.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.081 ↗
7. 10.1109/JPROC.2014.232031710.1109/JPROC.2014.2320317 ↗
8. 10.1039/c2ra21342g10.1039/c2ra21342g ↗
9. 10.1002/cssc.20200235410.1002/cssc.202002354 ↗
10. 10.1149/2.071208jes10.1149/2.071208jes ↗
11. 10.1039/C4EE02158D10.1039/C4EE02158D ↗
12. 10.1002/aenm.20110015210.1002/aenm.201100152 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20150218310.1002/aenm.201502183 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20180240610.1002/adma.201802406 ↗
15. 10.1002/cssc.20190337910.1002/cssc.201903379 ↗
16. 10.1126/sciadv.150088610.1126/sciadv.1500886 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.12.00610.1016/j.coelec.2019.12.006 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0014310.1021/acsenergylett.1c00143 ↗
19. 10.1149/2.0141601jes10.1149/2.0141601jes ↗
20. 10.1149/2.0681912jes10.1149/2.0681912jes ↗
21. 10.1039/c3ra00115f10.1039/c3ra00115f ↗
22. 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.01.01010.1016/j.coelec.2020.01.010 ↗
23. 10.1021/jz500222f10.1021/jz500222f ↗
24. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0142010.1021/acsenergylett.8b01420 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.00710.1016/j.joule.2017.08.007 ↗
26. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac1e5710.1149/1945-7111/ac1e57 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.8b0098110.1021/acsami.8b00981 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0025310.1021/acsaem.9b00253 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0061110.1021/acsenergylett.0c00611 ↗
30. 10.3389/fenrg.2020.57075410.3389/fenrg.2020.570754 ↗
31. 10.1149/2.0041801jes10.1149/2.0041801jes ↗
32. 10.1126/sciadv.160165910.1126/sciadv.1601659 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep1411710.1038/srep14117 ↗
34. 10.1039/c3ee00072a10.1039/c3ee00072a ↗
35. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0563610.1021/acsnano.0c05636 ↗
36. 10.1039/C9TA03371H10.1039/C9TA03371H ↗
37. 10.1007/s10853-018-3093-710.1007/s10853-018-3093-7 ↗
38. 10.1039/C9TA10929C10.1039/C9TA10929C ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20140419410.1002/adma.201404194 ↗
40. 10.1002/aenm.20150180810.1002/aenm.201501808 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.mtener.2017.04.00610.1016/j.mtener.2017.04.006 ↗
42. 10.1149/2.0891807jes10.1149/2.0891807jes ↗
43. 10.1002/batt.20190005610.1002/batt.201900056 ↗
44. 10.1039/C7TA02110K10.1039/C7TA02110K ↗
45. 10.1039/C6EE02057G10.1039/C6EE02057G ↗
46. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.01810.1016/j.joule.2018.12.018 ↗
47. 10.3389/fchem.2019.0082710.3389/fchem.2019.00827 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.07610.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.076 ↗
49. Wagner, C. D.; Riggs, W. M.; Davis, L. E.; Moulder, J. F.; Muilenberg, G. E. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Physical Electronics Division: Eden Prairie, MN, 1979. p 133.
50. 10.1149/2.1011501jes10.1149/2.1011501jes ↗
51. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab864510.1149/1945-7111/ab8645 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0022810.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00228 ↗
53. 10.1149/2.0051706jes10.1149/2.0051706jes ↗
54. 10.1021/ac203224410.1021/ac2032244 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0087410.1021/acsaem.1c00874 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0037410.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00374 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.01510.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.015 ↗
58. 10.1149/1.314872110.1149/1.3148721 ↗