journal article·2023-12-25Open access

Co, Ni-Free Ultrathick Free-Standing Dry Electrodes for Sustainable Lithium-Ion Batteries

Milan K. Sadan, Guo J. Lian, Rachel M. Smith, Denis Cumming

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 6· Issue 24

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The conventional method of manufacturing lithium-ion battery electrodes employs a complex slurry casting process with solvents that are not environmentally friendly and process parameters that are often difficult to control. This study explores a solvent-free dry electrode fabrication process of Co- and Ni-free LiMn 2 O 4 (LMO) cathodes using a fibrillated polymer, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). A thick, dry electrode (265–368 μm, 30–64 mg cm –2 ) of LMO cathode was prepared successfully for the first time. Altering the conductive additives in the LMO dry electrode revealed multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as the best conducting agent for dry electrode formulation in terms of conductivity and rate performance. Additionally, an all-dry electrode full cell consisting of both a dry electrode cathode (LMO) and an anode (LTO) delivered a stable cycling performance with a capacity retention of 82.8% after 200 cycles, demonstrating the scope for all-dry electrode full cells for future applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, U.K.

Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Campus, Didcot OX11 0RA, U.K.

Funding

Faraday Institution

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.02.00510.1016/j.iatssr.2023.02.005 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.06910.1016/j.procir.2023.02.069 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.prime.2023.10012710.1016/j.prime.2023.100127 ↗
4. 10.1002/admt.20170010610.1002/admt.201700106 ↗
5. 10.3390/batteries701001410.3390/batteries7010014 ↗
6. 10.1088/2515-7620/ab5e1e10.1088/2515-7620/ab5e1e ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.13110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.131 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.02710.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.027 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-023-37009-710.1038/s41467-023-37009-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.09710.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.097 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.05110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.051 ↗
13. 10.1002/ente.20210098510.1002/ente.202100985 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.01510.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.01.01110.1016/j.matt.2022.01.011 ↗
16. 10.1002/ente.20190030910.1002/ente.201900309 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.9b0302010.1021/acsami.9b03020 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0036110.1021/acsomega.3c00361 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0006610.1021/acsaem.9b00066 ↗
20. 10.1002/adsu.20220043910.1002/adsu.202200439 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.04810.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.048 ↗
22. 10.1002/cssc.20220132010.1002/cssc.202201320 ↗
23. 10.1039/D2EE03840D10.1039/D2EE03840D ↗
24. 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.14246910.1016/j.electacta.2023.142469 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.est.2019.10086210.1016/j.est.2019.100862 ↗
26. 10.1038/srep2315010.1038/srep23150 ↗
27. 10.1149/2.0401507jes10.1149/2.0401507jes ↗
28. 10.1002/eem2.1209910.1002/eem2.12099 ↗
29. 10.1149/2.0721414jes10.1149/2.0721414jes ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.05.02810.1016/j.jechem.2022.05.028 ↗
31. 10.3390/nano1219332010.3390/nano12193320 ↗
32. Dimitrios A. V. · 2017
33. 10.1002/adfm.20230134110.1002/adfm.202301341 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.11662310.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116623 ↗
35. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0471610.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04716 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10723810.1016/j.est.2023.107238 ↗