Co, Ni-Free Ultrathick Free-Standing Dry Electrodes for Sustainable Lithium-Ion Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The conventional method of manufacturing lithium-ion battery electrodes employs a complex slurry casting process with solvents that are not environmentally friendly and process parameters that are often difficult to control. This study explores a solvent-free dry electrode fabrication process of Co- and Ni-free LiMn 2 O 4 (LMO) cathodes using a fibrillated polymer, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). A thick, dry electrode (265–368 μm, 30–64 mg cm –2 ) of LMO cathode was prepared successfully for the first time. Altering the conductive additives in the LMO dry electrode revealed multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as the best conducting agent for dry electrode formulation in terms of conductivity and rate performance. Additionally, an all-dry electrode full cell consisting of both a dry electrode cathode (LMO) and an anode (LTO) delivered a stable cycling performance with a capacity retention of 82.8% after 200 cycles, demonstrating the scope for all-dry electrode full cells for future applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, U.K.
Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Campus, Didcot OX11 0RA, U.K.
Funding
Faraday Institution
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.02.00510.1016/j.iatssr.2023.02.005 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.06910.1016/j.procir.2023.02.069 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.prime.2023.10012710.1016/j.prime.2023.100127 ↗
4. 10.1002/admt.20170010610.1002/admt.201700106 ↗
5. 10.3390/batteries701001410.3390/batteries7010014 ↗
6. 10.1088/2515-7620/ab5e1e10.1088/2515-7620/ab5e1e ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.13110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.131 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.02710.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.027 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-023-37009-710.1038/s41467-023-37009-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.09710.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.097 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.05110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.051 ↗
13. 10.1002/ente.20210098510.1002/ente.202100985 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.01510.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.01.01110.1016/j.matt.2022.01.011 ↗
16. 10.1002/ente.20190030910.1002/ente.201900309 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.9b0302010.1021/acsami.9b03020 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0036110.1021/acsomega.3c00361 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0006610.1021/acsaem.9b00066 ↗
20. 10.1002/adsu.20220043910.1002/adsu.202200439 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.04810.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.048 ↗
22. 10.1002/cssc.20220132010.1002/cssc.202201320 ↗
23. 10.1039/D2EE03840D10.1039/D2EE03840D ↗
24. 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.14246910.1016/j.electacta.2023.142469 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.est.2019.10086210.1016/j.est.2019.100862 ↗
26. 10.1038/srep2315010.1038/srep23150 ↗
27. 10.1149/2.0401507jes10.1149/2.0401507jes ↗
28. 10.1002/eem2.1209910.1002/eem2.12099 ↗
29. 10.1149/2.0721414jes10.1149/2.0721414jes ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.05.02810.1016/j.jechem.2022.05.028 ↗
31. 10.3390/nano1219332010.3390/nano12193320 ↗
32. Dimitrios A. V. · 2017
33. 10.1002/adfm.20230134110.1002/adfm.202301341 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.11662310.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116623 ↗
35. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0471610.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04716 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10723810.1016/j.est.2023.107238 ↗