journal article·2020-03-23Open access

Interface Fracture Energy of Contact Layers in a Solid Oxide Cell Stack

Li Han, Belma Talic, Kawai Kwok, Peter Vang Hendriksen, Henrik Lund Frandsen

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 3· Issue 3

Abstract

A critical factor for improving the long-term stability/reliability of solid oxide cell stacks is ensuring good adhesion between the stack components. Specifically, ensuring strong adherence between the oxygen electrode and the interconnect is challenging. This work compares the suitability of several materials as contact layers between a La0.6Sr0.4CoO3−δ-Ce0.8Gd0.2O2 composite oxygen electrode and Mn1.5Co1.5O4- or Co-coated metallic interconnects. The contact materials were screened on the basis of measurements of the interface fracture energy using four-point bending of sandwiched samples. The highest fracture energies were measured using a CuMn metallic, spinel-forming foam as the contact layer. The fracture energy of the interface between a Mn1.5Co1.5O4-coated interconnect and the contact layer is ∼8 times higher using the CuMn foam compared with using conventional (La0.8Sr0.2)0.98MnO3-σ, La0.6Sr0.4CoO3−δ, (La0.8Sr0.2)0.98MnO3-σ + La0.6Sr0.4CoO3−δ or LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3 as the contact material. The interface bonding and fracture mechanisms are discussed on the basis of scanning electron microscopy investigations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Fysikvej Building 310, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32816, United States

Funding

Energinet.dk · Institut for Energikonvertering og -lagring, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.01410.1016/j.rser.2010.07.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.13010.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.130 ↗
3. 10.1149/05701.3217ecst10.1149/05701.3217ecst ↗
4. Ridjan, I.; Mathiesen, B.V.; Connolly, D. SOEC pathways for the production of synthetic fuels: The transport case; Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University: Aalborg, Denmark, 2013. https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/soec-pathways-for-the-production-of-synthetic-fuels-the-transport (accessed October 4, 2019).
5. 10.1002/1615-6854(200105)1:1<78::AID-FUCE78>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/1615-6854(200105)1:1<78::AID-FUCE78>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
6. 10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02756-010.1016/S0378-7753(97)02756-0 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.08.04910.1016/j.egypro.2012.08.049 ↗
8. 10.1149/05701.0763ecst10.1149/05701.0763ecst ↗
9. 10.1149/09101.0091ecst10.1149/09101.0091ecst ↗
10. 10.1149/09101.0123ecst10.1149/09101.0123ecst ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.01610.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.016 ↗
12. 10.1002/fuce.20180008110.1002/fuce.201800081 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.05010.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.050 ↗
14. 10.1002/fuce.20120017510.1002/fuce.201200175 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.00210.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.01710.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.017 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.328883510.1149/1.3288835 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssi.2006.01.04610.1016/j.ssi.2006.01.046 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10008-002-0330-310.1007/s10008-002-0330-3 ↗
20. Hjalmarsson, P. Strontium and nickel substituted lanthanum cobaltite as cathode in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, 2008; p 173.
21. 10.1007/BF0237591610.1007/BF02375916 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10008-009-0932-010.1007/s10008-009-0932-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00222-210.1016/S0167-2738(99)00222-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.083 ↗
25. 10.1002/fuce.20170000510.1002/fuce.201700005 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.7b1311610.1021/acsami.7b13116 ↗
27. Szabo, P.; Costa, R.; Han, F.; Kim, B.; Lee, I. Investigation of Advanced Cathode Contacting Solutions in SOFC. Proceedings 12th European SOFC & SOE ForumBrandon, N., Ed.; Lucerne, Switzerland, July 5–8, 2016.
28. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01522.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01522.x ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.04410.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.044 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.03110.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.031 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.03.03410.1016/j.elecom.2011.03.034 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.13710.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.137 ↗
33. 10.1115/1.317606910.1115/1.3176069 ↗
34. 10.1023/A:100753093272610.1023/A:1007530932726 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.13010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.130 ↗
36. 10.1557/jmr.2018.45910.1557/jmr.2018.459 ↗
37. 10.1557/JMR.2003.012710.1557/JMR.2003.0127 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.01110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.011 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.10010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.100 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.03610.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.036 ↗
41. 10.1557/JMR.1988.104310.1557/JMR.1988.1043 ↗
42. Thyssen Krupp. Crofer 22 APU Material Data Sheet No. 4046; VDM Metals GmbH: Werdohl, Germany, 2010.
43. 10.1002/fuce.20050010910.1002/fuce.200500109 ↗
44. 10.1111/jace.1225410.1111/jace.12254 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ssi.2018.09.01810.1016/j.ssi.2018.09.018 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.06710.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.067 ↗
47. 10.1149/07801.1713ecst10.1149/07801.1713ecst ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.02.00610.1016/j.ssi.2012.02.006 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.298773110.1063/1.2987731 ↗
50. German R.M. · 1996
51. 10.1149/09101.2225ecst10.1149/09101.2225ecst ↗