Development of the CO2 Adsorption Model on Porous Adsorbent Materials Using Machine Learning Algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
Porous adsorbents have common characteristics, such as high porosity and a large specific surface area. These characteristics, attributed to the internal structure of the material, significantly affect their adsorption performance. In this research study, we created a data set and collected data points from porous adsorbents (2789) from 21 published papers, including carbon-based, porous polymers, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and zeolites, to understand their characteristics for CO 2 adsorption. Different machine learning (ML) algorithms, such as NN, MLP-GWO, XGBoost, RF, DT, and SVM, have been applied to display the CO 2 adsorption performance as a function of characteristics and adsorption isotherm parameters. XGBoost was selected as the best ML algorithm due to its highest accuracy ( R 2 = 0.9980; MSE = 0.0001). The predicted results revealed that the adsorption pressure parameter is the most effective in all of the mentioned porous adsorbents. With regard to materials type, while carbon-based materials require higher pressures for a more effective CO 2 adsorption, MOFs exhibit a higher potential for adsorbing CO 2 under lower pressure conditions. The study also revealed that carbon-based adsorbents, zeolites, and porous polymers with smaller pore diameters demonstrate a high level of CO 2 uptake. In contrast, the adsorption performance of MOFs does not show a consistent trend with respect to pore sizes. Also, in all adsorbents, the effect of a pore size smaller than 1 nm on more CO 2 adsorption was evident.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chemical Engineering Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), Canmet ENERGY-Ottawa (CE-O), 1 Haanel Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M1, Canada
Center for Catalysis and Separation, Khalifa University, P.O. Box 127788, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Department of Chemical Engineering, Khalifa University, P.O. Box 127788, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Funding
Natural Resources Canada
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41558-018-0198-610.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 ↗
2. Lee, H.; Calvin, K.; Dasgupta, D.; Krinner, G.; Mukherji, A.; Thorne, P.; Trisos, C.; Romero, J.; Aldunce, P.; Barrett, K. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC, 2023.
3. 10.1038/s41579-019-0222-510.1038/s41579-019-0222-5 ↗
4. 10.3390/su1220836910.3390/su12208369 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.04.03110.1016/j.jtice.2018.04.031 ↗
6. Zoelle A. · 2015
7. 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.00110.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.04610.1016/j.energy.2016.11.046 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jtice.2016.12.01410.1016/j.jtice.2016.12.014 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.11644810.1016/j.seppur.2019.116448 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12173410.1016/j.seppur.2022.121734 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.9b0848710.1021/acsami.9b08487 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.rser.2020.11049010.1016/j.rser.2020.110490 ↗
14. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0706610.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07066 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12220110.1016/j.cej.2019.122201 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41563-021-01054-810.1038/s41563-021-01054-8 ↗
17. 10.1002/advs.20230428910.1002/advs.202304289 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.10125110.1016/j.jcou.2020.101251 ↗
19. 10.1002/cctc.20180104610.1002/cctc.201801046 ↗
20. 10.1002/sstr.20227001910.1002/sstr.202270019 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-019-10173-510.1038/s41467-019-10173-5 ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.9b1108410.1021/jacs.9b11084 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja305563910.1021/ja3055639 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.05010.1016/j.cej.2018.02.050 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20110175910.1002/adma.201101759 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20170022910.1002/adma.201700229 ↗
27. 10.1002/cssc.20090003610.1002/cssc.200900036 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.03310.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.033 ↗
29. 10.1021/ja307086410.1021/ja3070864 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.6b0833110.1021/acsami.6b08331 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c0378210.1021/acs.langmuir.3c03782 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12238310.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122383 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.15133410.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151334 ↗
34. 10.1039/C9TA00287A10.1039/C9TA00287A ↗
35. 10.1038/nature1454110.1038/nature14541 ↗
36. 10.1126/science.aaa841510.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0483010.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04830 ↗
38. 10.1038/nature1743910.1038/nature17439 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10039610.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100396 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.energy.2023.12854610.1016/j.energy.2023.128546 ↗
41. 10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c0004610.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00046 ↗
42. Cunningham P. · 2008 · 2110.1007/978-3-540-75171-7_2 ↗
43. Hady M. F. A. · 2013
44. Celebi M. E. · 201610.1007/978-3-319-24211-8 ↗
45. Wiering M. · 2012 · 1210.1007/978-3-642-27645-3_19 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0225710.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02257 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0120010.1021/acs.iecr.4c01200 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41598-023-30856-w10.1038/s41598-023-30856-w ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0275410.1021/acs.iecr.1c02754 ↗
50. 10.1002/ange.20181236310.1002/ange.201812363 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0169510.1021/acs.iecr.2c01695 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12291510.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122915 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12252110.1016/j.seppur.2022.122521 ↗
54. 10.1039/D4TA00251B10.1039/D4TA00251B ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b0094010.1021/acs.jctc.9b00940 ↗
56. 10.1007/s11356-022-22508-910.1007/s11356-022-22508-9 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.01310.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013 ↗
58. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0067310.1021/acsomega.2c00673 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12727910.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127279 ↗
60. 10.1021/ja02268a00210.1021/ja02268a002 ↗
61. 10.1515/zpch-1907-572310.1515/zpch-1907-5723 ↗
62. Ho, T. K. In Random Decision Forests, Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition; IEEE, 1995; pp 278–282.
63. 10.1038/nrn230310.1038/nrn2303 ↗
64. Siddique N. · 201310.1002/9781118534823 ↗
65. Kruse R. · 201110.1007/978-3-8348-8299-8 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.02.01110.1016/j.neunet.2020.02.011 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41467-018-04316-310.1038/s41467-018-04316-3 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.09.05010.1016/j.neucom.2020.09.050 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.00710.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 ↗
70. 10.1002/cjce.2506010.1002/cjce.25060 ↗
71. Vapnik V. · 1999
72. 10.1039/C8CS00829A10.1039/C8CS00829A ↗
73. 10.1038/s42004-019-0184-610.1038/s42004-019-0184-6 ↗
74. Lundberg S. M. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2017 · 30 · 07874
75. 10.1021/acsnano.3c1300110.1021/acsnano.3c13001 ↗