journal article·2024-02-12

Direct Z-Scheme Heterostructure of In Situ Planted ZnO Nanorods on g-C3N4 Thin Sheets Sprayed on TiO2 Layer: A Strategy for Ternary-Photoanode Engineering toward Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

Ahmed Esmail A. Aboubakr, Mahmoud Kamal Hussien, Amr Sabbah, Ahmed E. Hassan, Mohamed Hammad Elsayed, Zhenhai Wen, Kuei-Hsien Chen, Chen-Hsiung Hung

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 7· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we developed an approach to enhance the separation and transfer of charge carriers for photoelectrochemical water splitting in solar-driven hydrogen production. We achieved this by designing a highly efficient Z-scheme TiO 2 /g-C 3 N 4 /ZnO photoanode. The process involved electrodepositing a thin TiO 2 layer on FTO and optimizing the in situ ZnO implantation onto g-C 3 N 4 . These composites were confirmed by XRD, SEM, EDX, and TEM measurements. The growth of ZnO on g-C 3 N 4 resulted in strong chemical adhesion between the interface of ZnO and g-C 3 N 4, as supported by XPS data, and increased active surface area, as demonstrated by BET. The composition of ZnO and g-C 3 N 4 facilitated rapid charge separation and retarded change recombination through directional charge migration and decreased charge resistance, as evidenced by PEIS and TRPL measurements. Our airbrushing procedure for fabricating the g-C 3 N 4 /ZnO composite on TiO 2 also enhanced the charge collection efficiency, enabling us to construct a high-performance photoanode. The Z-scheme-type charge migration route was verified by EPR spectroscopy by trapping the radicals generated by charges and holes. PEC-WS measurements showed that TiO 2 /g-C 3 N 4 /ZnO heterostructure improved the produced photocurrent by about 160-, 40-, 20-, 8-, 2-, and 2-fold, relative to pristine g-C 3 N 4, pristine ZnO nanorods, ZnO/g-C 3 N 4 composite, pristine TiO 2, TiO 2 /ZnO, and TiO 2 /g-C 3 N 4, respectively, versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) at 1.23 V. The charge carriers’ separation and injection measurements showed that the fabrication of this ternary photoanode remarkably improved the PEC-WS performance. DFT results contributed to a deeper understanding of the mechanism of the photocatalytic process and confirmed that the as-fabricated ternary heterojunction promoted the separation/transfer efficiency of the photogenerated charge carriers, thereby promoting the activity of the photocatalytic process. This work could pave the way for better fabrication of ternary-based photoanodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Sustainable Chemical Science and Technology, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan

Department of Applied Chemistry, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan

Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, 128 Sec 2 Academia Rd., Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt

Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan

Tabbin Institute for Metallurgical Studies, Tabbin, Helwan 109, Cairo 11421, Egypt

CAS Key Laboratory of Design and Assembly of Functional Nanostructures, Fujian Key Laboratory of Nanomaterials, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, China

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo 11884, Egypt

Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 10617, Taiwan

Funding

Academia Sinica · National Science and Technology Council

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20160394510.1002/adma.201603945 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0254810.1021/acsaem.1c02548 ↗
3. 10.1002/cctc.20180202410.1002/cctc.201802024 ↗
4. 10.1039/C8CS00761F10.1039/C8CS00761F ↗
5. 10.1039/C5CS00729A10.1039/C5CS00729A ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat231710.1038/nmat2317 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20110118210.1002/anie.201101182 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4NR03008G10.1039/C4NR03008G ↗
9. 10.1039/B914110C10.1039/B914110C ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2014.04.00210.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2014.04.002 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0183910.1021/acsaem.2c01839 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.03810.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.038 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.05910.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.059 ↗
14. 10.1039/C8CY02283F10.1039/C8CY02283F ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0825110.1021/acsnano.6b08251 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.09.05210.1016/j.solener.2019.09.052 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0169410.1021/acsaem.9b01694 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.24010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.240 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11132610.1016/j.solmat.2021.111326 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11983310.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119833 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20220062910.1002/aenm.202200629 ↗
22. 10.1038/srep1609810.1038/srep16098 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.07810.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.078 ↗
24. 10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.6507510.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.240466310.1063/1.2404663 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20180066810.1002/adfm.201800668 ↗
28. 10.1021/jp306874z10.1021/jp306874z ↗
29. 10.1016/j.scib.2018.12.01510.1016/j.scib.2018.12.015 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20200192210.1002/adfm.202001922 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10854-020-04343-110.1007/s10854-020-04343-1 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10854-022-09153-110.1007/s10854-022-09153-1 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.10926610.1016/j.optmat.2019.109266 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13265210.1016/j.cej.2021.132652 ↗
35. 10.1039/C5TA05503B10.1039/C5TA05503B ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.03810.1016/j.cej.2018.07.038 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11947410.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119474 ↗
38. 10.1039/C4CC08996K10.1039/C4CC08996K ↗
39. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14510010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145100 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.01010.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.010 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11818010.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118180 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.02.02810.1016/j.cattod.2019.02.028 ↗
43. 10.1002/adfm.20201076310.1002/adfm.202010763 ↗
44. 10.1038/ncomms1422410.1038/ncomms14224 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10680910.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106809 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0197210.1021/acsanm.9b01972 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13779210.1016/j.cej.2022.137792 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.13110.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.131 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12554810.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125548 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10853-017-1506-710.1007/s10853-017-1506-7 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14008110.1016/j.cej.2022.140081 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12144710.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121447 ↗
53. 10.1002/aenm.20220062910.1002/aenm.202200629 ↗
54. 10.1039/D2MH00718E10.1039/D2MH00718E ↗
55. 10.1038/s41467-020-18484-810.1038/s41467-020-18484-8 ↗
56. 10.1002/anie.20210692910.1002/anie.202106929 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11953810.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119538 ↗
58. 10.1002/adfm.20180201510.1002/adfm.201802015 ↗