journal article·2021-09-27Open access

Fe-Modified Pd as an Effective Multifunctional Electrocatalyst for Catalytic Oxygen Reduction and Glycerol Oxidation Reactions in Alkaline Media

Andrea Cassani, Nazym Tuleushova, Qing Wang, Hazar Guesmi, Valerie Bonniol, Julien Cambedouzou, Sophie Tingry, Mikhael Bechelany, David Cornu, Yaovi Holade

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 4· Issue 9

Abstract

The development of high-performance catalytic nanomaterials is important to implement sustainable and electrochemical energy devices of alkaline fuel cells, metal–air batteries, and electrolyzers in the envisaged energy-transition scenarios. Synthesizing effective nanocatalysts as both anode materials for oxidation of glycerol (byproduct of the biodiesel industry) and cathode materials for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is still a bottleneck. Herein, we report palladium-based nanomaterials whose physicochemical and electrochemical properties are tuned by the judicious choice of the support (rGO, Vulcan XC72R), the addition of a coelement (Fe), and the structure (alloy/core–shell). The bimetallic-based electrode shows a drastically enhanced electrocatalytic performance with a beneficial shifting of the onset potential, production of high currents, and good durability for both the ORR (kinetic current density jk = 2 mA cmPd–2 or 1 A mgPd–1) and glycerol oxidation (jp = 2.3 mA cmPd–2 or 1.11 A mgPd–1 at the peak), higher than those of commercial catalysts and existing literature values. The present results also provide new fundamental insights about the accurate measurement of the kinetic metrics of the ORR by employing a rotating-disk (-ring) electrode setup in alkaline electrolytes with metallic catalysts. Indeed, the anodic scanning of the electrode from a low potential to a higher one results in an ultrafast electrochemical kinetics with a positive shift of the half-wave potential of ΔE1/2,anodic/cathodic = 60 mV from the cathodic direction to the anodic one. The kinetic current density dramatically increases, jk,anodic = 19.0×, 6.9×, 3.4×, and 2.4× jk,cathodic at 950, 900, 870, and 850 mVRHE, respectively. The advantage of the synthesis methodology relies on the nonuse of organic molecules as capping agents and surfactants in order to produce bare (ligand-free) bimetallic PdFe electrocatalysts with a clean catalytic surface in a facile and straightforward way.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut Européen des Membranes de Montpellier, IEM, UMR 5635, Univ Montpellier, ENSCM, CNRS, 34090 Montpellier, France

Institut Charles Gerhardt de Montpellier, ICGM, UMR 5253, Univ Montpellier, ENSCM, CNRS, 34090 Montpellier, France

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Cabot Corporation · European Institute of Membranes of Montpellier

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41560-019-0374-610.1038/s41560-019-0374-6 ↗
2. 10.1002/celc.20150002210.1002/celc.201500022 ↗
3. 10.1021/jacs.5b0386510.1021/jacs.5b03865 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat473810.1038/nmat4738 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.7b0832710.1021/acsami.7b08327 ↗
6. 10.1039/c6ee02229d10.1039/c6ee02229d ↗
7. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0480510.1021/acscatal.9b04805 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11936910.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119369 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.00910.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11795110.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117951 ↗
11. 10.1039/d0ta01063d10.1039/d0ta01063d ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20180476310.1002/adma.201804763 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12424010.1016/j.cej.2020.124240 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0549910.1021/acscatal.9b05499 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41586-019-1603-710.1038/s41586-019-1603-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.12.01810.1016/j.jcat.2019.12.018 ↗
17. 10.1002/cctc.20200044310.1002/cctc.202000443 ↗
18. 10.1149/2.1071509jes10.1149/2.1071509jes ↗
19. 10.1039/c6ta02096h10.1039/c6ta02096h ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0196110.1021/acsnano.9b01961 ↗
21. 10.1039/c8ee00019k10.1039/c8ee00019k ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11914910.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119149 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12274-020-2856-z10.1007/s12274-020-2856-z ↗
24. 10.1039/d0nr00046a10.1039/d0nr00046a ↗
25. 10.1021/nn100636810.1021/nn1006368 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0031310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00313 ↗
27. 10.1039/c4cp03851g10.1039/c4cp03851g ↗
28. Napporn, T. W.; Holade, Y.; Kokoh, B.; Mitsushima, S.; Mayer, K.; Eichberger, B.; Hacker, V. In Fuel Cells and Hydrogen: From Fundamentals to Applied Research; Hacker, V., Mitsushima, S., Eds. Elsevier, 2018; pp 175–214.10.1016/B978-0-12-811459-9.00009-8 ↗
29. 10.1016/0013-4686(90)85050-w10.1016/0013-4686(90)85050-w ↗
30. Gileadi, E. Electrodes Kinetics for Chemists, Chemical Engineers, and Materials Scientists; Wiley-VCH: New York, N Y, USA, 1993; p 616.
31. 10.1149/1.242357510.1149/1.2423575 ↗
32. Xing, W.; Yin, G.; Zhang, J. Rotating Electrode Methods and Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts, 1ed. Elsevier Science and Technology: Poland, 2014; p 322.10.1016/B978-0-444-63278-4.00001-X ↗
33. 10.1103/physrevb.45.1324410.1103/physrevb.45.13244 ↗
34. 10.1103/physrevb.47.55810.1103/physrevb.47.558 ↗
35. 10.1103/physrevb.49.1622310.1103/physrevb.49.16223 ↗
36. 10.1103/physrevb.59.175810.1103/physrevb.59.1758 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
38. 10.1021/cm00052a02210.1021/cm00052a022 ↗
39. 10.1149/2.0031904jes10.1149/2.0031904jes ↗
40. 10.1038/ncomms106710.1038/ncomms1067 ↗
41. 10.1038/ncomms255510.1038/ncomms2555 ↗
42. 10.1039/c4ra09822f10.1039/c4ra09822f ↗
43. 10.1039/c9na00317g10.1039/c9na00317g ↗
44. 10.1021/cm103413410.1021/cm1034134 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.10110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.101 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jcat.2013.05.00610.1016/j.jcat.2013.05.006 ↗
47. 10.1126/science.113594110.1126/science.1135941 ↗
48. 10.1021/ja060047610.1021/ja0600476 ↗
49. 10.1021/jp305166k10.1021/jp305166k ↗
50. 10.1021/ac60338a03710.1021/ac60338a037 ↗
51. 10.1021/jp068997110.1021/jp0689971 ↗
52. 10.1021/ja044972910.1021/ja0449729 ↗
53. 10.1002/sia.74018120610.1002/sia.740181206 ↗
54. 10.1002/celc.20140235310.1002/celc.201402353 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.10.00310.1016/j.jelechem.2005.10.003 ↗
56. Orazem, M. E.; Tribollet, B. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, 2ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2017; p 367.10.1002/9781119363682 ↗
57. 10.1016/0013-4686(93)85058-710.1016/0013-4686(93)85058-7 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.susc.2014.06.01510.1016/j.susc.2014.06.015 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1015810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10158 ↗
60. 10.1179/174328006x10251010.1179/174328006x102510 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.susc.2015.04.01710.1016/j.susc.2015.04.017 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.495510410.1063/1.4955104 ↗
63. 10.1039/c9cp00752k10.1039/c9cp00752k ↗
64. 10.1039/c3cp44088e10.1039/c3cp44088e ↗
65. 10.1021/jp502969s10.1021/jp502969s ↗
66. 10.1021/ja808908710.1021/ja8089087 ↗
67. 10.1038/376238a010.1038/376238a0 ↗
68. 10.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-010.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0 ↗