journal article·2021-12-27Open access

Limited Accessibility to Surface Area Generated by Thermal Pretreatment of Electrodes Reduces Its Impact on Redox Flow Battery Performance

Katharine V. Greco, Jude K. Bonesteel, Nicolas Chanut, Charles Tai-Chieh Wan, Yet-Ming Chiang, Fikile R. Brushett

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 4· Issue 12

Abstract

Thermal oxidation of carbon electrodes is a common approach to improving flow battery performance. Here, we investigate how thermal pretreatment increases electrode surface area and the effect this added surface area has on the electrode performance. Specifically, we rigorously analyze the surface area of Freudenberg H23 carbon paper electrodes, a binder-free model material, by systematically varying the pretreatment temperature (400, 450, and 500 °C) and time (0–24 h) and evaluating the changes in the physical, chemical, and electrochemical properties of the electrodes. We compare the physical surface area, measured by a combination of gas adsorption techniques, to the surface area measured via electrochemical double-layer capacitance. We find good agreement between the two at shorter treatment times (0–3 h); however, at longer treatment times (6–24 h), the surface area measured electrochemically is an underestimate of the physical surface area. Further, we use gas adsorption to measure the pore size distribution and find that the majority of pores are in the micropore range (<2 nm), and ca. 60% of the added surface area is in the subnanometer (<1 nm) pore size range. We postulate that the solvated radii and imperfect wetting of electrochemical species may hinder active species transport into these recessed regions, explaining the discrepancy between the electrochemical and physical surface areas. These results are supported by in situ flow cell testing, where single-electrolyte polarization measurements show little improvement with increasing surface area. Further, using a simple convection-reaction model to simulate the electrode overpotential as a function of surface area, we find that increasing surface area improves the performance to a point, but the mass transport to and the catalytic activity of the reaction sites offer greater comparative impact. Ultimately, this work aims to inform the design of electrodes that offer maximal accessible surface area to redox species.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

MultiScale Materials Science for Energy and Environment, CNRS/MIT/Aix-Marseille University Joint, Laboratory at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Joint Center for Energy Storage Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Department of Material Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States

Funding

ExxonMobil Foundation · Basic Energy Sciences · National Science Foundation

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr100290v10.1021/cr100290v ↗
2. 10.1149/1.359956510.1149/1.3599565 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20120069410.1002/adfm.201200694 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11837-010-0129-010.1007/s11837-010-0129-0 ↗
5. 10.1002/er.186310.1002/er.1863 ↗
6. 10.1039/C4EE02158D10.1039/C4EE02158D ↗
7. 10.1149/2.0101601jes10.1149/2.0101601jes ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.03810.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.038 ↗
9. 10.1016/0013-4686(92)85064-R10.1016/0013-4686(92)85064-R ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.03810.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.038 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.11810.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.118 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.12810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.128 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.00410.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.004 ↗
14. 10.1149/2.0311713jes10.1149/2.0311713jes ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.6b1447810.1021/acsami.6b14478 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.070 ↗
17. 10.1002/adsu.20170014810.1002/adsu.201700148 ↗
18. 10.1039/C9TA00807A10.1039/C9TA00807A ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.10.02210.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.10.022 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.04810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.048 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.00110.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.11.00210.1016/j.coelec.2019.11.002 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12317810.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123178 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.06610.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.066 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13621010.1016/j.electacta.2020.136210 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.06410.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.064 ↗
27. 10.1115/1.404666110.1115/1.4046661 ↗
28. 10.1246/bcsj.77.220310.1246/bcsj.77.2203 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13817710.1016/j.electacta.2021.138177 ↗
30. 10.1149/2.0941409jes10.1149/2.0941409jes ↗
31. 10.1149/05307.0031ecst10.1149/05307.0031ecst ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.12510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.125 ↗
33. 10.1149/2.0611910jes10.1149/2.0611910jes ↗
34. 10.1016/0013-4686(95)00416-510.1016/0013-4686(95)00416-5 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.05610.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.056 ↗
36. 10.1021/ja01269a02310.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.12.01110.1016/j.carbon.2012.12.011 ↗
38. 10.1021/la00034a03210.1021/la00034a032 ↗
39. 10.1021/la991011c10.1021/la991011c ↗
40. Jagiello J. · 1998 · 6
41. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.00410.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.004 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.02610.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.026 ↗
43. 10.1149/2.051208jes10.1149/2.051208jes ↗
44. 10.1149/2.0201711jes10.1149/2.0201711jes ↗
45. Freudenberg Gas Diffusion Layers Technical Data. Freudenberg Performance Materials ; Fuel Cell Store, 1999.
46. 10.1039/C6EE02027E10.1039/C6EE02027E ↗
47. Deen W. M. · 2012
48. 10.1016/0009-2509(57)85028-310.1016/0009-2509(57)85028-3 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsami.8b1579310.1021/acsami.8b15793 ↗
50. 10.1002/cssc.20190254710.1002/cssc.201902547 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.02010.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.020 ↗
52. Sing K. S. W. · 2014 · 23710.1016/B978-0-08-097035-6.00007-3 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.08310.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.083 ↗
54. 10.1515/pac-2014-111710.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.01210.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.012 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.475807110.1063/1.4758071 ↗
57. 10.1007/s10765-007-0154-610.1007/s10765-007-0154-6 ↗
58. 10.1149/1.171509510.1149/1.1715095 ↗
59. Rodriguez-Reinoso F. · 1988 · 21
60. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.01.02210.1016/j.carbon.2004.01.022 ↗
61. 10.1021/la00020a04510.1021/la00020a045 ↗
62. 10.1021/la00073a01310.1021/la00073a013 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.01310.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.013 ↗
64. Magnin, Y.; Chanut, N.; Pantano, D. A.; Chaput, E.; Ulm, F. J.; Pellenq, R. J.M.; Villermaux, E. Granular-like Behavior of Molecular Flow in Constricted Nanopores. 2020, arXiv:2011.08594 [cond-mat, physics:physics].
65. 10.1002/anie.20070489410.1002/anie.200704894 ↗
66. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0217810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02178 ↗
67. Marcus Y. · 201510.1002/9781118892336 ↗
68. 10.1007/s10800-011-0348-210.1007/s10800-011-0348-2 ↗
69. 10.1149/2.052311jes10.1149/2.052311jes ↗