Washing Characterization of Compression Socks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Background Compression socks are highly recommended textile garments for the exertion of compression pressure (kPa) at the ankle. They work on the principle of the highest pressure at the ankle gradually decreasing from the ankle to the calf. Aim The aim of the current research is to analyze all of the compression sock samples (Class I, Class II, and Class III) simultaneously at various number of times of washing them. Method All of the sock samples were washed in a standard washing machine with standard methods (ISO 6330). For the measurement of the compression pressure, a Salzmann MST MKIV pressure measuring device was used according to the RAL-GZ 387/1 method. Results Results included the effect of multiple wearing and washing cycles (up to 20) on compression pressure, the effect of temperature (up to 100°C) on compression pressure (kPa); multiple wearing and washing cycles on the percentage of shrinkage and the effect of marking methodology on compression pressure (Kpa) were observed and are discussed in this article. The results suggest that washing is the most important factor to consider while compression socks are used for compression therapy because they directly influence the efficacy of streamline blood flow across the legs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases · Foot and Ankle Surgery · Tendon Structure and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Textile Engineering , Technical University of Liberec , Czech Republic
Vocational School, Clothing Production Technology Program , Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University , Istanbul
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. H.C, Meghan, C. Kwon, W. Oxenham, E. Grant and L. Reid Jr. J. Text. Inst., 106, 7, 757–767 (2015).10.1080/00405000.2014.941535 ↗
2. NJM. London and R. Br. Med. J. 320(7246), 1391–1394 (2000).10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1391 ↗
3. R. Harpa, C. Piroi, and C. Doru Radu, Text. Res. J., 80, 683 (2010).10.1177/0040517509343781 ↗
4. M. W. L Smith and J. C. Dalbey, US Patent, 7,895,863 B2 (2011).
5. https://www.theveincentre.co.nz/vein-treatment/compression-stockings-varicose-veins-dvt/.
6. https://www.sfveincenter.com/venous-insufficiency/.
7. BS 6612:1985, “British Standard Specification for Graduated Compression Hosiery”, British Standards Institution, London, 1985.
8. Certificat de qualite-produits. Referentiel technique prescrit pour les ortheses elastiques de contention des membres. Paris: ASQUAL, 1999.
9. RAL Deutsches Institut fur Gutesicherung und Kennzeichnung e.V.: Medical compression hosiery—Quality assurance RAL-GZ 387/1, 2008.
10. Y. Wang, P. Zhangn, and Y. Zhang, Text. Res. J., 84, 572 (2014).10.1177/0040517513503726 ↗
11. N. Sau-fun, H. Chi-leung, and W. Lai-fan, Textile Progress, 43, 37 (2011).10.1080/00405167.2011.573240 ↗
12. L. Macintyre, M. Baird, and P. Weedall, Int. J. Clothing Sci. Technol., 16, 173 (2004).10.1108/09556220410520450 ↗
13. C. L. Hui and S. F. Ng, Text. Res. J., 71, 683 (2001).10.1177/004051750107100806 ↗
14. M. Clark and G. Krimmel. MEP Ltd, 2–4, (2006).
15. https://www.ameswalker.com/blogs/news/wear-with-care-three-ways-to-keep-your-compression-socks-as-good-as-new/.
16. https://www.discountsurgical.com/content.asp?contentid=77/.
17. http://www.jobst-usa.com/our-products/wear-care/.
18. https://www.thespruce.com/how-to-care-for-compression-garments-2145792/.
19. https://occfitsolutions.com/faqs/how-do-i-properly-care-for-my-compression-socks-stockings/.
20. http://www.orthohealth.ca/compression-therapy/use-and-care-of-medical-compression-stockings/.
21. http://www.derbyshiremedicinesmanagement.nhs.uk/assets/japc/JAPC/JAPC_ToR.pdf/.
22. https://eastkentformulary.nhs.uk/media/1216/compression-hosiery-guidance-v3-ekpg-march-2016.pdf/.
23. R. Liu, T.T. Lao, T.J. Little, X. Wu and X. Ke. Tex. Res. Journal, 88(17), 1915–1930 (2018).10.1177/0040517518779254 ↗
24. H. Maleki, M. Aghajani, A.H. Sadeghi, A. Asghar and A. Jeddi. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr., 6(2), 30–39 (2011).10.1177/155892501100600204 ↗
25. R. Harpa, C. Piroi and C. D. Radu. Tex. Res. J. 80(8), 683–695, (2010).10.1177/0040517509343781 ↗
26. H.F. Siddique, A.A. Mazari, A. Havelka, and Z. Kus. Fibers Polym. 20(5), 1092–1107, (2019).10.1007/s12221-019-8965-1 ↗
27. L. Macintyre, H. Stewart and M. Rae. Int. J. Nurs. Stud, 64, 19–24 (2016).10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.004 ↗
28. L. Macintyre, H. Stewart and M. Rae. Phlebology, 6(1), 9–14 (2016).
29. S. Ghosh, A. Mukhopadhyay, M. Sikka, and K. S. Nagla. J. Tissue Viability. 17(3), 82–94 (2008).10.1016/j.jtv.2007.09.013 ↗