journal article·2024-02-12Open access

Ethylene Production from Carbonate Using a Bipolar Membrane Electrolysis System

Hakhyeon Song, Carlos A. Fernández, Anush Venkataraman, Victor D. Brandão, Sandeep S. Dhingra, Sukaran S. Arora, Saket S. Bhargava, Carlos M. Villa, Carsten Sievers, Sankar Nair, Marta C. Hatzell

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 7· Issue 3

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Electrochemical CO 2 reduction has attracted significant interest as a pathway for achieving a carbon-neutral society. However, conventional gas-phase CO 2 electrolysis cell configurations often face challenges like low CO 2 utilization efficiency due to carbonate crossover, and costly integration with carbon capture systems. The membrane electrode assembly (MEA) electrolysis cell configuration involving a bipolar membrane (BPM) has been recently spotlighted as this system can directly release CO 2 stored in carbonate solutions using a pH swing process driven by water dissociation within the BPM. Here, we assess the reactor’s capacity to liberate CO 2 and facilitate its conversion into ethylene (C 2 H 4 ), using Cu–Ag catalysts and carbon capture solutions such as potassium carbonate (K 2 CO 3 ). Bench-top flow cell system testing using an optimized Cu–Ag electrocatalyst demonstrates that the conversion of CO 2 to C 2 H 4 reaches 10% Faradaic efficiency, corresponding to a partial current density of 10 mA/cm 2 . During all tests, the BPM-MEA electrolysis cell also maintained approximately 0% CO 2 concentration in the outlet over 24 h. Operating at elevated temperatures, such as 50 °C, has shown promising results in our exploration, demonstrating improved C 2 H 4 Faradaic efficiency and current densities. Lastly, we examine the feasibility of this combined CO 2 generation and conversion reactor architecture and estimate the potential energy and process efficiencies achievable using the BPM-MEA system. While the BPM-MEA system offers innovative solutions for carbon capture and conversion, continued research and optimization are imperative to fully harness its potential for a sustainable future.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Advanced battery technologies research · Ionic liquids properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

Dow Incorporated, 2211 H.H. Dow Way, Midland, Michigan 48674, United States

Dow Chemical Company, 332 TX-332, Lake Jackson, Texas 77566, United States

Funding

Dow Chemical Company

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0258710.1021/acsenergylett.2c02587 ↗
2. 10.1088/2515-7655/ac782310.1088/2515-7655/ac7823 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0351410.1021/acs.iecr.7b03514 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.aay421710.1126/science.aay4217 ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.2c0682010.1021/jacs.2c06820 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20180311110.1002/adma.201803111 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10005110.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100051 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.00910.1016/j.joule.2020.07.009 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41565-019-0551-610.1038/s41565-019-0551-6 ↗
10. 10.1039/D1TA10345H10.1039/D1TA10345H ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20211113610.1002/anie.202111136 ↗
12. 10.3390/molecules2608217510.3390/molecules26082175 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20230728310.1002/anie.202307283 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.09.00910.1016/j.jiec.2022.09.009 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.abg658210.1126/science.abg6582 ↗
16. 10.1002/ente.20160074710.1002/ente.201600747 ↗
17. 10.1002/celc.20210154010.1002/celc.202101540 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0073810.1021/acsenergylett.3c00738 ↗
19. 10.1021/acscentsci.3c0069210.1021/acscentsci.3c00692 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0097510.1021/acsenergylett.9b00975 ↗
21. 10.1021/acscentsci.2c0032910.1021/acscentsci.2c00329 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0160610.1021/acsenergylett.0c01606 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0028310.1021/acsenergylett.2c00283 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0116010.1021/acsenergylett.2c01160 ↗
25. 10.1002/celc.20210040810.1002/celc.202100408 ↗
26. 10.1039/D1EE02608A10.1039/D1EE02608A ↗
27. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.02110.1016/j.joule.2019.05.021 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2022.11178210.1016/j.jinorgbio.2022.111782 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-023-38963-y10.1038/s41467-023-38963-y ↗
30. 10.1038/s41557-020-00602-010.1038/s41557-020-00602-0 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.1c1651310.1021/acsami.1c16513 ↗
32. 10.1039/D2EY00046F10.1039/D2EY00046F ↗
33. 10.1002/cssc.20220132910.1002/cssc.202201329 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.05.00310.1016/j.joule.2023.05.003 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0226310.1021/acsenergylett.1c02263 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.00610.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41467-020-20397-510.1038/s41467-020-20397-5 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0070510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0035210.1021/acs.iecr.2c00352 ↗
40. 10.1002/anie.20200061710.1002/anie.202000617 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0013310.1021/acsenergylett.3c00133 ↗
42. 10.1039/D2MA00185C10.1039/D2MA00185C ↗
43. 10.1021/acscatal.3c0070610.1021/acscatal.3c00706 ↗
44. 10.1126/science.aaz148710.1126/science.aaz1487 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.02110.1016/j.joule.2019.07.021 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.eng.2018.08.00110.1016/j.eng.2018.08.001 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.energy.2005.04.00110.1016/j.energy.2005.04.001 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.2c0768010.1021/acsami.2c07680 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41467-022-31429-710.1038/s41467-022-31429-7 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13212710.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132127 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11948410.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119484 ↗
52. Gibon T. · 2022