journal article·2022-07-25Open access

Importance of Chemical Activation and the Effect of Low Operation Voltage on the Performance of Pt-Alloy Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts

Matija Gatalo, Alejandro Martinez Bonastre, Léonard Jean Moriau, Harriet Burdett, Francisco Ruiz-Zepeda, Edwin Hughes, Adam Hodgkinson, Martin Šala, Luka Pavko, Marjan Bele, Nejc Hodnik, Jonathan Sharman, Miran Gaberšček

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 5· Issue 7

Abstract

Pt-alloy (Pt-M) nanoparticles (NPs) with less-expensive 3d transition metals (M = Ni, Cu, Co) supported on high-surface-area carbon supports are currently the state-of-the-art (SoA) solution to reach the production phase in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). However, while Pt-M electrocatalysts show promise in terms of increased activity for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and, thus, cost reductions from the significantly lower use of expensive and rare Pt, key challenges in terms of synthesis, activation, and stability remain to unlock their true potential. This work systematically tackles them with a combination of electrocatalyst synthesis and characterization methodologies including thin-film rotating disc electrodes (TF-RDEs), an electrochemical flow cell linked to an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (EFC-ICP-MS), and testing in 50 cm2 membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs). In the first part of the present work, we highlight the crucial importance of the chemical activation (dealloying) step on the performance of Pt-M electrocatalysts in the MEA at high current densities (HCDs). In addition, we provide the scientific community with a preliminary and facile method of distinguishing between a "poorly" and "adequately" dealloyed (activated) Pt-alloy electrocatalyst using a much simpler and affordable TF-RDE methodology using the well-known CO-stripping process. Since the transition-metal cations can also be introduced in a PEMFC due to the degradation of the Pt-M NPs, the second part of the work focuses on presenting clear evidence on the direct impact of the lower voltage limit (LVL) on the stability of Pt-M electrocatalysts. The data suggests that in addition to intrinsic improvements in stability, significant improvements in the PEMFC lifetime can also be obtained via the correct MEA design and applied limits of operation, namely, restricting not just the upper but equally important also the lower operation voltage.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Chemistry, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

ReCatalyst d.o.o., Hajdrihova 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Johnson Matthey Technology Centre, Blount’s Court, Sonning Common, Reading RG4 9NH, U.K.

Johnson Matthey Fuel Cells, Lydiard Fields, Great Western Way, Swindon SN5 8AT, U.K.

Department of Analytical Chemistry, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

University of Nova Gorica, 5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia

Funding

North Atlantic Treaty Organization · Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS · Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking · H2020 European Research Council

References (83)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/2.0211514jes10.1149/2.0211514jes ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.02110.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 ↗
3. https://www.pegasus-pemfc.eu/technical-presentation-of-the-project/ (accessed March 26, 2020).
4. DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record ; Department of Energy, 2019. https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/17007_fuel_cell_system_cost_2017.pdf (accessed July 01, 2019).
5. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0021610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 ↗
6. 10.1016/J.COELEC.2019.10.00910.1016/J.COELEC.2019.10.009 ↗
7. 10.1039/C0EE00011F10.1039/C0EE00011F ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20191245110.1002/anie.201912451 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41565-020-00824-w10.1038/s41565-020-00824-w ↗
10. Pourbaix M. · 1974
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0064410.1021/acsenergylett.6b00644 ↗
12. 10.1016/J.COELEC.2018.04.01310.1016/J.COELEC.2018.04.013 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.aaa876510.1126/science.aaa8765 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.124906110.1126/science.1249061 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl401881z10.1021/nl401881z ↗
16. 10.1126/science.113594110.1126/science.1135941 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.139254410.1149/1.1392544 ↗
18. 10.1002/bbpc.1990094090710.1002/bbpc.19900940907 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20050438610.1002/anie.200504386 ↗
20. 10.1038/nchem.62310.1038/nchem.623 ↗
21. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0099710.1021/acscatal.6b00997 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.aab350110.1126/science.aab3501 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41563-018-0133-210.1038/s41563-018-0133-2 ↗
24. Kongkanand, A.; Wagner, F. High-Activity Dealloyed Catalysts . https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review14/fc087_kongkanand_2014_o.pdf (accessed June 24, 2022).10.2172/1262711 ↗
25. Myers, D.; Kariuki, N.; Ahluwalia, R.; Wang, X.; Peng, J.K. Rationally Designed Catalyst Layers for PEMFC Performance Optimization . https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review15/fc106_myers_2015_o.pdf (accessed June 24, 2022).
26. Myers, D.; Kariuki, N.; Ahluwalia, R.; Wang, X.; Cetinbas, C. F.; Peng, J.K. Rationally Designed Catalyst Layers for PEMFC Performance Optimization . https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review16/fc106_myers_2016_o.pdf (accessed June 24, 2022).
27. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan: 3.4 Fuel Cells ; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), 2017. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/05/f34/fcto_myrdd_fuel_cells.pdf (accessed June 24, 2022).
28. 10.1039/C4EE02144D10.1039/C4EE02144D ↗
29. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10389210.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103892 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.15310.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.153 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0214210.1021/acsaem.8b02142 ↗
32. 10.1149/08008.0283ecst10.1149/08008.0283ecst ↗
33. 10.1149/2.0671916jes10.1149/2.0671916jes ↗
34. 10.1149/2.0341806jes10.1149/2.0341806jes ↗
35. 10.1149/2.0171806jes10.1149/2.0171806jes ↗
36. Strlič M. · Acta Chim. Slov. · 2003 · 50 · 619
37. 10.1021/jp311353u10.1021/jp311353u ↗
38. 10.1021/jp306107t10.1021/jp306107t ↗
39. 10.1002/fuce.20190018910.1002/fuce.201900189 ↗
40. 10.1021/jp077641210.1021/jp0776412 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.10210210.1016/j.isci.2021.102102 ↗
42. 10.1149/1.298185810.1149/1.2981858 ↗
43. 10.1039/C3SC52411F10.1039/C3SC52411F ↗
44. 10.1002/cctc.20130093610.1002/cctc.201300936 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.00510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.005 ↗
46. 10.1002/anie.20201471110.1002/anie.202014711 ↗
47. 10.1149/2.F03152if10.1149/2.F03152if ↗
48. Lohse-Busch, H.; Duoba, M.; Stutenberg, K.; Iliev, S.; Kern, M. Technology Assessment of a Fuel Cell Vehicle: 2017 Toyota Mirai , Technical Report; Argonne National Laboratory, 2018.10.2172/1463251 ↗
49. 10.1149/2.0161806jes10.1149/2.0161806jes ↗
50. 10.1002/anie.20190356810.1002/anie.201903568 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0257010.1021/acsaem.1c02570 ↗
52. 10.1002/anie.20100428710.1002/anie.201004287 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.05.01610.1016/j.jelechem.2010.05.016 ↗
54. Bard A. J. · 1980
55. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.11.05710.1016/j.electacta.2007.11.057 ↗
56. 10.1039/C7CP03192K10.1039/C7CP03192K ↗
57. 10.1149/2.0191806jes10.1149/2.0191806jes ↗
58. 10.1039/c4cc00086b10.1039/c4cc00086b ↗
59. 10.1021/jacs.7b0807110.1021/jacs.7b08071 ↗
60. Kocha S. S. · 2010
61. 10.1149/2.106204jes10.1149/2.106204jes ↗
62. 10.1007/s11669-010-9701-010.1007/s11669-010-9701-0 ↗
63. 10.1021/cm101090p10.1021/cm101090p ↗
64. 10.3762/bjnano.5.510.3762/bjnano.5.5 ↗
65. 10.1149/2.0031806jes10.1149/2.0031806jes ↗
66. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.05910.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.059 ↗
67. 10.1149/2.0731614jes10.1149/2.0731614jes ↗
68. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0292010.1021/acscatal.5b02920 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.09.04710.1016/j.jelechem.2017.09.047 ↗
70. 10.1002/anie.20120725610.1002/anie.201207256 ↗
71. 10.1007/s12678-014-0187-010.1007/s12678-014-0187-0 ↗
72. 10.1002/celc.20150009810.1002/celc.201500098 ↗
73. 10.1021/jp110436e10.1021/jp110436e ↗
74. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0420510.1021/acscatal.1c04205 ↗
75. 10.1039/c2cp42191g10.1039/c2cp42191g ↗
76. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0211610.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02116 ↗
77. Balbuena, P. B.; Calvo, S. R.; Callejas-Tovar, R.; Gu, Z.; Ramirez-Caballero, G. E.; Hirunsit, P.; Ma, Y. In Challenges in the Design of Active and Durable Alloy Nanocatalysts for Fuel Cells BT─Theory and Experiment in Electrocatalysis Balbuena, P. B.; Subramanian, V. R., Eds. Springer: New York, NY, 2010; pp 351–396.10.1007/978-1-4419-5594-4_9 ↗
78. 10.1149/1.204094910.1149/1.2040949 ↗
79. 10.1149/1945-7111/abe5ea10.1149/1945-7111/abe5ea ↗
80. 10.1038/s41563-020-0735-310.1038/s41563-020-0735-3 ↗
81. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0150710.1021/acsenergylett.0c01507 ↗
82. 10.1021/jacs.6b0035910.1021/jacs.6b00359 ↗
83. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0288310.1021/acscatal.5b02883 ↗