Tie-Dyeing Pattern Fast-Generation Method Based on Deep-Learning and Digital-Image-Processing Technology
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Contingency and uniqueness are regarded as typical artistic characteristics. To accomplish the realistic effect of each tie-dyeing pattern artwork, we propose a digital tie-dyeing pattern fast-generation algorithm based on auxiliary-classifier deep-convolution generative adversarial network (AC-DCGAN) and image-processing technology. To apply this algorithm, the designer first draws the planar layout diagram of the tie-dyeing patterns. The diagram consists of a white background and polychrome circles, and the regional-connectivity algorithm is used to extract information on all the circle positions as well as the pattern categories in the diagram. Then the AC-DCGAN-generated background image is color-corrected to stitch and complete its construction. The AC-DCGAN-generated tie-dyeing pattern image is also color-corrected and is then segmented and copied to the circle area. Mean filtering creates the final digital tie-dyeing patterns. Results show no obvious color difference in generated patterns, splicing edges show uniform transition, and unique patterns exhibit tie-dye characteristics, achieving realistic artistic effects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques · Image Enhancement Techniques · Color Science and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Clothing, School for the Art , Jinling Institute of Technology , Nanjing , Jiangsu , China
Department of Mathematics , University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Gu, M. (2004). The general talk about technique of modern tie-dye. Journal of Donghua University, 3, 41–45.
2. Liu, S. Q., Gao, W. D., Xue, W., Gu, M., Liang, H. E. (2016). Tie-dye technique and pattern features. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research, 41, 180–187.
3. Carter, N. C., Eagles, R. L., Grimes S. M., Hahn A. C., Reiter C. A. (1998). Chaotic attractors with discrete planar symmetries. Chaos Solitions and Fractals, 9, 2031–2054.10.1016/S0960-0779(97)00157-4 ↗
4. Lu, J., Ye, Z. X., Zou, Y. R. (2005). Orbit trap tendering methods for generating artistic images with crystallographic symmetries. Computers & Graphics, 29, 787–794.10.1016/j.cag.2005.08.008 ↗
5. Lv, J., Pan, W., Liu, Z. (2014). Method of batik simulation based on interpolation subdivisions. Journal of Multimedia, 9, 286–293.10.4304/jmm.9.2.286-293 ↗
6. Lu, S., Mok, P. Y., Jin, X. (2017). A new design concept: 3D to 2D textile pattern design for garments. Computer-Aided Design, 89, 35–49.10.1016/j.cad.2017.03.002 ↗
7. Tian, G. D., Yuan, Q. N., Hu, T., Shi, Y. (2019). Auto-generation system based on fractal geometry for batik pattern design. Applied Sciences, 9, 2383.10.3390/app9112383 ↗
8. Wang, W. J., Zhang, G. P., Yang, L. M. (2019). Research on garment pattern design based on fractal graphics. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2019, 29.10.1186/s13640-019-0431-x ↗
9. Zhou, J. (2004). Digital jacquard fabric design in colorful mode. Journal of Donghua University, 21, 98–101.
10. Zhou, J. (2007). Innovative principle and method for digital jacquard fabric designing. Journal of Donghua University, 24, 341–346.
11. Barnsley, M., Hurd, A. J. (2000). Fractals everywhere. American Journal of Physics, 97, 1053.
12. Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Bing, X., David, W.-F., Sherjil, O., et al. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3, 2672–2680.
13. Creswell, A., White, T., Dumoulin, V, Arulkumaran K., Sengupta B., Bharath A. A. (2017). Generative adversarial networks: An overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35, 53–65.10.1109/MSP.2017.2765202 ↗
14. Azadi, S., Fisher, M., Kim, V. G., Wang, Z., Shechtman, E., Darrell, T. (2018). Multi-content gan for few-shot font style transfer. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 7564–7573.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00789 ↗
15. Li, P., Hu, Y., Li, Q., He, R., Sun, Z. (2018). Global and local consistent age generative adversarial networks. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Beijing, China. pp. 1073–1078.10.1109/ICPR.2018.8545119 ↗
16. Yang, H., Zhu, K., Huang, D., Li, H., Wang, Y., Chen, L., et al. (2021). Intensity enhancement via GAN for multi-modal face expression recognition. Neurocomputing, 454(1),124–134.10.1016/j.neucom.2021.05.022 ↗
17. Huang, R., Zhang, S., Li, T., He, R. (2017). Beyond face rotation: Global and local perception gan for photorealistic and identity pre-serving frontal view synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy. pp. 2458–2467.10.1109/ICCV.2017.267 ↗
18. Santana, E., Hotz, G. (2016). Learning a driving simulator. arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1608.01230.
19. Chen, W., Hays, J. (2018). Sketchygan: Towards diverse and realistic sketch to image synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 9416–9425.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00981 ↗
20. Mirza, M., Osindero, S. (2014). Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784.
21. Radford, A., Metz, L., Chintala, S. (2015). Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1511.06434.
22. Odena, A., Olah, C., Shlens, J. (2017). Conditional image synthesis with auxiliary classifier GANs. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, Sydney, Australia. PMLR 70.
23. Tian, J., Li, X., Duan, F., Wang, J., Ou, Y. (2016). An efficient seam elimination method for UAV images based on Wallis dodging and Gaussian distance weight enhancement. Sensors, 16, 662.10.3390/s16050662 ↗
24. Li, W. Z., Sun, K. M., Li, D. R., Bai, T. (2016). Algorithm for automatic image dodging of unmanned aerial vehicle images using two-dimensional radiometric spatial attributes. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 10, 036023.10.1117/1.JRS.10.036023 ↗
25. Ostu, N. (1979). A threshold selection method from gray-histogram. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9, 62–66.10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
26. Satapathy, S. C., Sri Madhava Raja, N., Rajinikanth, V., Ashour, A. S., Dey, N. (2018). Multi-level image thresholding using Otsu and chaotic bat algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, 29, 1285–1307.10.1007/s00521-016-2645-5 ↗
27. Zhou, J., Gu, J. (2004). Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13, 600–612.10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗