journal article·2020-04-27

Comparison of 1-Propyl-5H-tetrazole and 1-Azidopropyl-5H-tetrazole as Ligands for Laser Ignitable Energetic Materials

Maximilian H. H. Wurzenberger, Simon M. J. Endraß, Marcus Lommel, Thomas M. Klapötke, Jörg Stierstorfer

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 3· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Laser ignitable explosives are potential candidates in future applications for replacing toxic and very sensitive primary explosives, which are used in current devices. In this study, the literature unknown ligand 1-azidopropyl-5H-tetrazole (APT, 1) was synthesized for the first time and applied in energetic coordination compounds (ECC). The complexes are based on different 3d transition metals (Mn2+, Fe2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+) as well as various oxidizing anions (NO3–, ClO4–, and ClO3–) and were tested toward their capability as laser ignitable explosives. Furthermore, analogous complexes based on the literature known ligand 1-propyl-5H-tetrazole (PT, 2) were investigated for comparing the influence of the additional azide group toward the performance of the ECC. Toxicity measurements using Vibrio fischeri and the decreased sensitivities prove their usability as safer laser ignitable explosive with lower toxicities compared to currently used explosives.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Ocular and Laser Science Research · Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, 81377 München, Germany

Funding

Office of Naval Research Global · U.S. Department of Defense · Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit?t M?nchen

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/187493a010.1038/187493a0 ↗
2. 10.2514/1.B3511510.2514/1.B35115 ↗
3. Weinrotter M. · Laser Phys. · 2005 · 15 · 947
4. 10.1023/A:101275620284110.1023/A:1012756202841 ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.6b0215510.1021/jacs.6b02155 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.10570910.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105709 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.9b1435310.1021/acsami.9b14353 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0160810.1021/acsaem.9b01608 ↗
9. 10.1039/C9DT01254K10.1039/C9DT01254K ↗
10. 10.1021/jacs.8b1020010.1021/jacs.8b10200 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0004910.1021/acsaem.9b00049 ↗
12. Kunz S. C. · Proceedings of the 13th International Pyrotechnics Seminar · 1988 · 505
13. Merson J. A. · Proceedings of the 19th International Pyrotechnics Seminar · 1994 · 191
14. 10.1002/ejic.20160034410.1002/ejic.201600344 ↗
15. 10.1023/B:RJAC.0000038815.59138.f310.1023/B:RJAC.0000038815.59138.f3 ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.7b1323010.1021/jacs.7b13230 ↗
17. 10.1002/asia.20190026910.1002/asia.201900269 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ica.2005.06.02910.1016/j.ica.2005.06.029 ↗
19. 10.1107/S010876819200904210.1107/S0108768192009042 ↗
20. Mills, A. M.; Spek, A. L.; Stassen, A. F.; Haasnoot, J. G.; Reedijk, J. Private Communication CCDC 637921, 2007.
21. Klapötke T. M. · 201810.1515/9783110442922 ↗
22. 10.1039/C9NJ03937F10.1039/C9NJ03937F ↗
23. 10.1039/C8TA01412D10.1039/C8TA01412D ↗
24. 10.1006/eesa.1997.162410.1006/eesa.1997.1624 ↗
25. 10.1002/chem.20140036210.1002/chem.201400362 ↗