journal article·2023-08-28

Mechanistic Features of the CeO2-Modified Ni/Al2O3 Catalysts for the CO2 Methanation Reaction: Experimental and Ab Initio Studies

Ayesha A. Alkhoori, Omer Elmutasim, Aasif A. Dabbawala, Michalis A. Vasiliades, Klito C. Petallidou, Abdul-Hamid Emwas, Dalaver H. Anjum, Nirpendra Singh, Mark A. Baker, Nikolaos D. Charisiou, Maria A. Goula, Angelos M. Efstathiou, Kyriaki Polychronopoulou

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 6· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the Ni/CeO 2 /Al 2 O 3 catalyst system to explore the influence of different synthesis parameters on interfacial phenomena and their impact on CO 2 methanation. The focus was on the textural properties of alumina, ceria loading, and the synthesis method of supported Ni, in relation to the catalyst’s activity and CH 4 selectivity. Among the catalysts studied, Ni–20Ce/ mpAl demonstrated promising results, with an X CO2 value of 70% and S CH4 value exceeding 94% at 350 °C. We observed that medium- and high-porosity alumina facilitated better ceria dispersion, while Ni-CeO 2 cogrowth led to small Ni crystallites (∼4 nm) that increased in size after 8 h of reaction. This catalyst exhibited several advantageous features for CO 2 methanation, including a high concentration of oxygen vacancies (confirmed through Raman studies) and a significant presence of surface Ce 3+ species (validated by XPS and EPR studies). It also displayed excellent carbonyl activation capacity, high H-spillover capability, and strong SMSI phenomena. CO 2 -TPD and charge transfer Bader analysis confirmed the basic (Lewis) character of the catalyst’s surface. Specifically, Ce 3+ species, along with Ni atoms, provided suitable dual sites for CO 2 adsorption at the Ni-ceria interface, forming Ni···O–C–O···Ce 3+ entities. Furthermore, our analysis using operando SSITKA-DRIFTS revealed the active participation of both Ni and the support in the CO 2 methanation reaction, validating the ab initio studies. Notably, linear and bridged adsorbed CO species (CO L and CO B ) on the Ni surface, as well as bicarbonates (HCOOOs), were identified as active reaction intermediates involving Ce 3+ –OH and Al 3+ –OH entities. Comparing the thermal stability of carbonate-type intermediates to that of carbonyls, a CO-mediated mechanism emerged as the predominant pathway over the Ni–20Ce/ mpAl catalyst.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysts for Methane Reforming · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering Department, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi 127788, United Arab Emirates

Center for Catalysis and Separation (CeCaS), Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi 127788, United Arab Emirates

Department of Chemistry, Heterogeneous Catalysis Laboratory, University of Cyprus, 1 University Avenue, University Campus, Nicosia 2109, Cyprus

Core Laboratories, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

Physics Department, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi 127788, United Arab Emirates

The Surface Analysis Laboratory, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 4DL, United Kingdom

Laboratory of Alternative Fuels and Environmental Catalysis (LAFEC), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, Kozani 50100, Greece

Funding

Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research · European Regional Development Fund · Department of Education and Knowledge · Greece Government

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C3EE41272E10.1039/C3EE41272E ↗
2. 10.3390/nano1101002810.3390/nano11010028 ↗
3. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0231010.1021/acscatal.7b02310 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.catcom.2011.08.03710.1016/j.catcom.2011.08.037 ↗
5. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0182710.1021/acscatal.7b01827 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.catcom.2014.05.02210.1016/j.catcom.2014.05.022 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.catcom.2017.06.04410.1016/j.catcom.2017.06.044 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1003-9953(11)60422-210.1016/S1003-9953(11)60422-2 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.07.02010.1016/j.cattod.2016.07.020 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0013410.1021/acs.iecr.6b00134 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.00310.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.003 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.12771710.1016/j.fuel.2023.127717 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.15710.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.157 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12761210.1016/j.cej.2020.127612 ↗
15. 10.1039/C3RA46569A10.1039/C3RA46569A ↗
16. Efstathiou A. M. · 2012 · 101310.1002/9783527645329.ch22 ↗
17. 10.1039/9781782626855-0017510.1039/9781782626855-00175 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-017-00558-910.1038/s41467-017-00558-9 ↗
19. 10.1039/C6CY00478D10.1039/C6CY00478D ↗
20. 10.1021/jp108106t10.1021/jp108106t ↗
21. 10.1088/0370-1298/62/11/11010.1088/0370-1298/62/11/110 ↗
22. 10.3390/catal907062110.3390/catal9070621 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.catcom.2020.10623710.1016/j.catcom.2020.106237 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.150510.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.03510510.1103/PhysRevB.71.035105 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20160248910.1002/anie.201602489 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.17610.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.176 ↗
31. 10.1002/slct.20200032410.1002/slct.202000324 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14630510.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146305 ↗
33. 10.1080/2055074X.2016.125254810.1080/2055074X.2016.1252548 ↗
34. 10.3390/coatings1005043210.3390/coatings10050432 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41598-019-39105-510.1038/s41598-019-39105-5 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.06710.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.067 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.26.225710.1103/PhysRevB.26.2257 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.13610.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.136 ↗
39. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0446910.1021/acscatal.7b04469 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.03.00810.1016/j.ssi.2014.03.008 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12040110.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120401 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.05410.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.054 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11875510.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118755 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0926-860X(03)00085-110.1016/S0926-860X(03)00085-1 ↗
45. 10.1002/sia.302610.1002/sia.3026 ↗
46. 10.1002/sia.554910.1002/sia.5549 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.11.03910.1016/j.molcata.2016.11.039 ↗
48. 10.1002/anie.20160859710.1002/anie.201608597 ↗
49. 10.1039/D0GC04377J10.1039/D0GC04377J ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ssi.2006.01.03110.1016/j.ssi.2006.01.031 ↗
51. 10.1039/C7CY02301D10.1039/C7CY02301D ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11849410.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118494 ↗
53. 10.3390/catal809038010.3390/catal8090380 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11956210.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119562 ↗
55. 10.3390/catal803011010.3390/catal8030110 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.00210.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.002 ↗
57. 10.3389/fctls.2021.65896510.3389/fctls.2021.658965 ↗
58. 10.1038/s41578-019-0152-x10.1038/s41578-019-0152-x ↗
59. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0421910.1021/acscatal.8b04219 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.28110.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.281 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jcat.2016.07.01810.1016/j.jcat.2016.07.018 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.06.01010.1016/j.cattod.2015.06.010 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0038910.1021/acs.iecr.1c00389 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.06.01010.1016/j.cattod.2008.06.010 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.catcom.2013.10.03410.1016/j.catcom.2013.10.034 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11853810.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118538 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.02.00510.1016/j.apcata.2015.02.005 ↗
68. 10.1021/jp960976r10.1021/jp960976r ↗
69. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0146410.1021/acscatal.5b01464 ↗
70. 10.3390/catal702005910.3390/catal7020059 ↗