journal article·2021-03-22Open access

Crystalline Disorder, Surface Chemistry, and Their Effects on the Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER) Activity of Mass-Produced Nanostructured Iridium Oxides

Raghunandan Sharma, Martin Aaskov Karlsen, Per Morgen, Jessica Chamier, Dorthe Bomholdt Ravnsbæk, Shuang Ma Andersen

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 4· Issue 3

Abstract

In the present study, three mass-produced commercial IrOx samples from different suppliers were studied to establish correlations between various properties and their OER activities. The structures of the electrocatalysts at different scales were explored through laboratory instrumentation, powder X-ray diffraction, and synchrotron-based X-ray total scattering experiments combined with pair distribution function analysis. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy using a transmission electron microscope were used to determine respectively the surface and the bulk elemental compositions of the samples. The coherent domain size (CDS) values of IrOx phases within the catalyst particles were estimated to be ∼10, ∼ 19, and ∼ 54 Å for the three IrOx samples. Surprisingly, the sample with a CDS of ∼19 Å turned out as the best OER electrocatalyst among the three in terms of mass-specific activity, IOER(m), followed by the 10 and 54 Å species. The amount of surface native compound oxygen was found to be a key parameter for the interface electrochemical accessibility. The intrinsic OER activity, evaluated using area-specific activity, IOER(a), suggests that the oxide with lattice disorder presenting a mixture of tetragonal and orthorhombic phases (70:20 w/w) is of superior intrinsic OER activity; however, the oxide with the presence of a monoclinic-like phase is of inferior intrinsic OER activity, which may also be due to the surface presence of Ir3+ along with Ir4+. The classic belief that the pure tetragonal phase is the best crystalline structure as the OER catalyst is challenged. Iridium oxides with disordered crystallinities may offer a class of highly active oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. The knowledge thus obtained should have a significant impact on the understanding, selection, and processing of IrOx-based OER electrocatalysts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Green Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark

Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark

HySA Catalysis, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Corner of Madiba Circle and South Lane Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa

Funding

Energistyrelsen · Carlsbergfondet · Innovationsfonden · EnergiFyn

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C2EE22554A10.1039/C2EE22554A ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.01310.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.013 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.06.03910.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.06.039 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20200047810.1002/aenm.202000478 ↗
5. 10.1002/cctc.20100039710.1002/cctc.201000397 ↗
6. 10.1039/D0QI01465F10.1039/D0QI01465F ↗
7. 10.1038/srep3842910.1038/srep38429 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.05.01510.1016/j.jelechem.2016.05.015 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.09.02410.1016/j.electacta.2011.09.024 ↗
10. 10.1149/2.0411409jes10.1149/2.0411409jes ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.06410.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.064 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0036810.1021/acsenergylett.8b00368 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-017-01734-710.1038/s41467-017-01734-7 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0262510.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02625 ↗
15. 10.1039/C7CC09580E10.1039/C7CC09580E ↗
16. 10.1039/C9EE01872G10.1039/C9EE01872G ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0771915jes10.1149/2.0771915jes ↗
18. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0434710.1021/acscatal.9b04347 ↗
19. 10.1039/C6SC04622C10.1039/C6SC04622C ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20140231110.1002/anie.201402311 ↗
21. 10.1039/C5CP06997A10.1039/C5CP06997A ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.7b0807110.1021/jacs.7b08071 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.04.03310.1016/j.jelechem.2016.04.033 ↗
24. Hammersley, A. FIT2D: an introduction and overview, http://www.esrf.eu/computing/scientific/FIT2D/FIT2D_INTRO/fit2d.html.
25. 10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I ↗
26. 10.1107/S002188981300519010.1107/S0021889813005190 ↗
27. 10.1088/0953-8984/19/33/33521910.1088/0953-8984/19/33/335219 ↗
28. Fairley, N. CasaXPS Version 2.3.19PR1.0: Software Package For Data Processing., http://www.casaxps.com/.
29. 10.1149/2.0731904jes10.1149/2.0731904jes ↗
30. 10.1002/sia.589510.1002/sia.5895 ↗
31. 10.1002/cssc.20160014310.1002/cssc.201600143 ↗
32. 10.1002/sia.622510.1002/sia.6225 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.020 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0086110.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00861 ↗
35. 10.1002/cctc.20140219410.1002/cctc.201402194 ↗
36. 10.1021/jz501061n10.1021/jz501061n ↗
37. 10.1002/anie.20170965210.1002/anie.201709652 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.08.02710.1016/j.elecom.2014.08.027 ↗
39. 10.1002/anie.20140645510.1002/anie.201406455 ↗