High-Performance Solid-State Lithium-Ion Battery with Mixed 2D and 3D Electrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
It is well established that the miniaturization of batteries has not kept pace with the miniaturization of electronics. Three-dimensional (3D) batteries, which were developed with the intent of improving microbattery performance, have had limited success because of fabrication challenges and material constraints. Solid-state, 3D batteries have been particularly susceptible to these shortcomings. In this paper, we demonstrate that the incorporation of a high-conductivity, solid electrolyte is the key to achieving a nonplanar solid-state battery with high areal capacity and high power density. The model 2.5D platform used in this study is a modification of the more typical 3D configuration in that it is comprised of a cathode array of pillars (3D) and a planar (two-dimensional, 2D) anode. This 2.5D geometry exploits the use of a high-conductivity, ionogel electrolyte (10–3 S cm–1), which interpenetrates the 3D electrode array. The 2.5D battery offers high areal energy densities from the post array, while the high-conductivity, solid electrolyte enables high power densities (3.7 mWh cm–2 at 2.8 mW cm–2). The reported solid-state 2.5D device exceeds the energy and power densities of any 3D solid-state system and the derived multiphysics model provides guidance for achieving significantly higher energy and power densities.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94550, United States
Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences · Sandia National Laboratories
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1134/S106378421108021410.1134/S1063784211080214 ↗
2. 10.1149/2.0181808jes10.1149/2.0181808jes ↗
3. 10.1039/c3ee43526a10.1039/c3ee43526a ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.16410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.164 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mseb.2004.05.04510.1016/j.mseb.2004.05.045 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1388-2481(02)00556-810.1016/S1388-2481(02)00556-8 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20180093310.1002/aenm.201800933 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.6b1224410.1021/acsami.6b12244 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.10810.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.108 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ssi.2006.02.04810.1016/j.ssi.2006.02.048 ↗
11. 10.1149/2.0771712jes10.1149/2.0771712jes ↗
12. 10.1002/ente.20140201810.1002/ente.201402018 ↗
13. 10.1149/2.0661414jes10.1149/2.0661414jes ↗
14. 10.1149/2.0211711jes10.1149/2.0211711jes ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.9b0009310.1021/acsami.9b00093 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.01210.1016/j.joule.2017.08.012 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0073910.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00739 ↗
18. 10.1039/C9TA05804D10.1039/C9TA05804D ↗
19. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0088510.1021/acsaem.8b00885 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.04510.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.045 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.01910.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.019 ↗
22. 10.3389/fenrg.2016.0003210.3389/fenrg.2016.00032 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.11.00810.1016/j.electacta.2010.11.008 ↗
24. 10.1149/1.330845910.1149/1.3308459 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20150539110.1002/adma.201505391 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.19710.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.197 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.00210.1016/j.joule.2018.04.002 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0875110.1021/acsnano.7b08751 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41560-020-0565-110.1038/s41560-020-0565-1 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20130103610.1002/adma.201301036 ↗
31. 10.1109/JMEMS.2005.85186010.1109/JMEMS.2005.851860 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.08410.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.084 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.7b1378810.1021/acsami.7b13788 ↗