journal article·2019-11-25Open access

Impact of Microporous Layer Roughness on Gas-Diffusion-Electrode-Based Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Performance

Min Wang, Samantha Medina, Jason R. Pfeilsticker, Svitlana Pylypenko, Michael Ulsh, Scott A. Mauger

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 2· Issue 11

Abstract

This study explores the role of the gas diffusion media microporous layer (MPL) surface structure on the electrochemical properties of gas-diffusion-electrode (GDE)-based membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs). It has been shown that a thin ionomer layer on top of the GDE and hot pressing is needed to create good contact between the catalyst layer and the membrane. In this study, gas diffusion media with different MPL surface roughness were applied to fabricate GDE-based MEAs to understand how MPL roughness impacts the amount of ionomer overlayer required for maximum performance. Electron microscopy was employed to investigate MPL/catalyst layer and catalyst layer/membrane interfaces. In-situ performance testing was used to assess the impact of MPL roughness and ionomer overlayer on catalyst utilization and air polarization performance. We find that a smoother MPL surface required a thinner ionomer overlayer than gas diffusion media (GDM) with a rougher MPL surface to achieve a performance comparable to direct-coated catalyst-coated-membrane MEAs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemistry and Nanoscience Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

Department of Chemistry, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

Funding

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy · Fuel Cell Technologies Office

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10800-008-9758-110.1007/s10800-008-9758-1 ↗
2. 10.1115/IMECE2009-1159710.1115/IMECE2009-11597 ↗
3. 10.1149/2.0091813jes10.1149/2.0091813jes ↗
4. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00542-610.1016/S0378-7753(02)00542-6 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.400363210.1115/1.4003632 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.16510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.165 ↗
7. 10.1149/1.300639810.1149/1.3006398 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.363557710.1149/1.3635577 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10800-008-9758-110.1007/s10800-008-9758-1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.08610.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.086 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.11010.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.110 ↗
12. Mauger S. · J. Power Sources · 2019
13. 10.1149/1.226629410.1149/1.2266294 ↗
14. 10.1149/2.0361506jes10.1149/2.0361506jes ↗
15. Pfeilsticker, J. Open-Source Impedance Fitter. https://github.com/NREL/OSIF.