Electrochemical Characterization of High Energy Density Graphite Electrodes Made by Freeze-Casting
Source abstract
Abstract
Despite extensive and continuous research to find alternatives, the Li-ion battery community still relies on graphite to manufacture most negative electrodes. Although graphite has many advantages, its relatively low volumetric energy density remains a limiting factor for many heavy-duty applications, such as electric vehicles (EVs) and grid storage. With the aim of increasing cells level energy density and decreasing cost by building thicker electrodes, freeze-casting, a shaping technique able to produce low-tortuosity structures by using ice crystals as a pore-forming agent, is used here to produce porous graphite anodes. The electrochemical performance is assessed using galvanostatic constant current (GCC) charge–discharge as well as hybrid pulse power characterization (HPPC) techniques. The obtained GCC discharge capacities of ∼18, ∼14, and ∼7 mAh/cm2 at C/10, C/5, and 1C, respectively, show a 5-fold enhancement compared with conventional composite electrodes. Finally, our freeze-cast electrodes also meet the pulse power requierements (1C rate pulses) embodied in the HPPC test protocol.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute, Qatar Foundation, Doha 34110, Qatar
Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Funding
Vehicle Technologies Program · Wallonie-Bruxelles International
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.08110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.081 ↗
2. 10.1021/nl800957b10.1021/nl800957b ↗
3. 10.1039/b904116h10.1039/b904116h ↗
4. 10.1021/nn102339t10.1021/nn102339t ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20120046910.1002/adma.201200469 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.02710.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.027 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl502848z10.1021/nl502848z ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20110463410.1002/adma.201104634 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature0785310.1038/nature07853 ↗
10. 10.1021/jz101542210.1021/jz1015422 ↗
11. Linden, D.; Reddy, T. B. Handbook of Batteries, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2004; p 1200.
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.16110.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.161 ↗
13. 10.1149/2.0151508jes10.1149/2.0151508jes ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20120405510.1002/adma.201204055 ↗
15. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.9710.1038/nenergy.2016.97 ↗
16. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.9910.1038/nenergy.2016.99 ↗
17. 10.1002/adem.20070027010.1002/adem.200700270 ↗
18. 10.1557/jmr.2013.10510.1557/jmr.2013.105 ↗
19. Behr S. · Process Eng. · 2015 · 92 · 39
20. 10.1149/2.1321802jes10.1149/2.1321802jes ↗
21. 10.1021/am400122r10.1021/am400122r ↗
22. 10.1002/jbm.b.3099710.1002/jbm.b.30997 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.028 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.00710.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.007 ↗
25. 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/01500310.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015003 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01720.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01720.x ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.10910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.109 ↗
28. 10.1126/science.116486510.1126/science.1164865 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20150615710.1002/adma.201506157 ↗
30. 10.1038/srep1862610.1038/srep18626 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20150431310.1002/adma.201504313 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma604131010.3390/ma6041310 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0388810.1021/acsnano.5b03888 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.07710.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.077 ↗