journal article·2019-03-25

Garnet–Polymer Composite Electrolytes: New Insights on Local Li-Ion Dynamics and Electrodeposition Stability with Li Metal Anodes

Jakub Zagórski, Juan Miguel López del Amo, Megan J. Cordill, Frédéric Aguesse, Lucienne Buannic, Anna Llordés

ACS Applied Energy Materials· Volume 2· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Ceramic–polymer solid electrolytes, combined with Li metal anodes, hold the promise for safer and more energetically dense battery technologies, as long as key interfacial challenges are fully understood and solved. Here, we investigate a garnet–PEO(LiTFSI) composite electrolyte system, the garnet filler being Li6.55Ga0.15La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) microparticles. A “soft” mechanical milling process ensures good miscibility between the garnet and polymer phases over a wide range of volume fraction (up to 70 vol % garnet). Excellent degree of structural and chemical homogeneity is achieved without degradation nor segregation, even at the local level, as confirmed by solid-state NMR spectroscopy, electron microscopy and gel permeation chromatography. The total Li-ion conductivity of the composites is governed by the polymer matrix, as a consequence of the high interfacial resistance (∼104 Ω cm2) between the garnet particles and the PEO(LiTFSI) matrix. However, by using 7Li NMR 2D exchange spectroscopy (ESXY) in the solid state, it is shown that Li ions can locally exchange between the garnet surfaces to the surrounding polymer chains. This dynamic transfer phenomenon, occurring within the composite, seems to play a key role in kinetically stabilizing the interface with Li metal electrode, as observed from galvanostatic cycling and EIS experiments. Comparison of a garnet-free PEO electrolyte with a PEO–garnet (10 vol %) composite shows key performance improvements in the latter: although the Li-ion conductivity at 70 °C slightly decreases from 7.0 × 10–4S cm–1, for PEO-LiTFSI, to 4.5 × 10–4 S cm–1 for 10 vol % LLZO, the composite shows up to 1 order of magnitude lower interfacial resistance with Li metal electrode (33 vs 300 Ω cm2), stable Li electrodeposition, and no dendrite formation. In contrast to previously believed, it is demonstrated that these improvements are not related to a change of the mechanical behavior but rather to a structural reorganization in the composite followed by local ion dynamics effects at the vicinity of the Li metal interface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CIC Energigune, Parque Tecnológico de Álava, 01510 Miñano, Spain

Erich Schmid Institute of Materials Science, Austrian Academy of Sciences and the Department of Materials Physics, Monanuniversität Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria

IKERBASQUE, The Basque Foundation for Science, 48013 Bilbao, Spain

Funding

Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science · Ministerio de Econom?a y Competitividad · Eusko Jaurlaritza

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00080-210.1016/S0167-2738(02)00080-2 ↗
3. 10.1149/1.151997010.1149/1.1519970 ↗
4. 10.1149/2.1571707jes10.1149/2.1571707jes ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20170265710.1002/aenm.201702657 ↗
6. 10.1039/c4cs00020j10.1039/c4cs00020j ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.01610.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.016 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0322310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03223 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.6b1392510.1021/acsami.6b13925 ↗
10. 10.1021/am508111r10.1021/am508111r ↗
11. 10.1504/IJVD.2015.07108310.1504/IJVD.2015.071083 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.09910.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.099 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.7b0380610.1021/acsami.7b03806 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12274-017-1498-210.1007/s12274-017-1498-2 ↗
15. 10.1073/pnas.170848911410.1073/pnas.1708489114 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.16210.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.162 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.160042211310.1073/pnas.1600422113 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ssi.2016.04.01410.1016/j.ssi.2016.04.014 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.7b1730110.1021/acsami.7b17301 ↗
21. 10.1039/C7TA05832B10.1039/C7TA05832B ↗
22. 10.5796/electrochemistry.84.21010.5796/electrochemistry.84.210 ↗
23. 10.1039/C4CP05865H10.1039/C4CP05865H ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.735510.1103/PhysRevA.42.7355 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.296942410.1149/1.2969424 ↗
26. 10.1149/1.185085410.1149/1.1850854 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.176715810.1149/1.1767158 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20170100310.1002/aenm.201701003 ↗
29. 10.1149/2.030203jes10.1149/2.030203jes ↗
30. 10.1149/1.347379010.1149/1.3473790 ↗
31. 10.1149/1.139342310.1149/1.1393423 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0237590410.1007/BF02375904 ↗
33. 10.1021/cm500806910.1021/cm5008069 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0536910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05369 ↗
35. Rodriíguez-Carvajal, J. FullProf Suite http://www.ill.eu/sites/fullprof/index.html.
36. Stratton J. A. · 1941
37. 10.1002/mrc.98410.1002/mrc.984 ↗
38. 10.1023/A:101375851872110.1023/A:1013758518721 ↗
39. 10.1016/0022-0728(87)80001-310.1016/0022-0728(87)80001-3 ↗
40. 10.1016/0167-2738(88)90304-910.1016/0167-2738(88)90304-9 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.11110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.111 ↗
42. 10.1021/cm504512210.1021/cm5045122 ↗
43. 10.1149/2.0331701jes10.1149/2.0331701jes ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.020 ↗
45. 10.1007/s11581-016-1830-y10.1007/s11581-016-1830-y ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0060010.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00600 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.004 ↗
48. 10.1088/1361-6463/aa867510.1088/1361-6463/aa8675 ↗
49. 10.1002/anie.20160753910.1002/anie.201607539 ↗
50. Huynh T.-V. · 2015
51. 10.1016/bs.arnmr.2016.03.00110.1016/bs.arnmr.2016.03.001 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2012.02.00110.1016/j.ssnmr.2012.02.001 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41467-017-01187-y10.1038/s41467-017-01187-y ↗
54. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.00210.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.002 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.coche.2017.04.00610.1016/j.coche.2017.04.006 ↗
56. 10.1039/C6TA02621D10.1039/C6TA02621D ↗
57. 10.1016/j.scib.2017.10.01110.1016/j.scib.2017.10.011 ↗
58. 10.1149/2.085405jes10.1149/2.085405jes ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0042310.1021/acs.macromol.7b00423 ↗
60. 10.1149/2.0381712jes10.1149/2.0381712jes ↗
61. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.00810.1016/j.joule.2018.03.008 ↗
62. 10.1038/nnano.2017.1610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
63. 10.1149/1.185411710.1149/1.1854117 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.041 ↗
65. 10.1021/ja502133j10.1021/ja502133j ↗
66. 10.1021/jacs.7b0953110.1021/jacs.7b09531 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.05310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.053 ↗
68. 10.1038/ncomms736210.1038/ncomms7362 ↗
69. 10.1016/S0378-7753(98)00242-010.1016/S0378-7753(98)00242-0 ↗
70. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0068410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00684 ↗