DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2025-02

A comprehensive research on SNPR structures with energy absorption and bearing capacities: topology optimization, numerical simulation and experimental verification

Kaixing Wang, Chengling Yang, Yishan Pan, Lianpeng Dai

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 8
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Love A (1892) A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1038/047529a010.1038/047529a0 ↗
2. Baughman RH, Shacklette JM, Zakhidov AA et al (1998) Negative Poisson’s ratios as a common feature of cubic metals. Nature 392(6674):362–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/3284210.1038/32842 ↗
3. Bianchi M, Scarpa F (2013) Vibration transmissibility and damping behaviour for auxetic and conventional foams under linear and nonlinear regimes. Smart Mater Struct 22(8):084010. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/08401010.1088/0964-1726/22/8/084010 ↗
4. Caddock BD, Evans KE (1989) Microporous materials with negative Poisson’s ratios. I. Microstructure and mechanical properties. J Phys D Appl Phys 22(12):1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.10393310.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103933 ↗
5. Evans KE, Caddock BD (1989) Microporous materials with negative Poisson’s ratios. II. Mechanisms and interpretation. J Phys D Appl Phys 22(12):1883. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160136310.1002/adma.201601363 ↗
6. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Schajer GS et al (1982) The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 382(1782):25–42. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1982.008710.1098/rspa.1982.0087 ↗
7. Masselter T, Bold G, Thielen M et al (2018) Bioinspired materials and structures: a case study based on selected examples. Bioinspired Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119390350.ch1310.1002/9781119390350.ch13 ↗
8. Schwerdtfeger J, Wein F, Leugering G et al (2011) Design of auxetic structures via mathematical optimization. Adv Mater 23(22):2650. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20100409010.1002/adma.201004090 ↗
9. Sigmund O (1994) Materials with prescribed constitutive parameters: an inverse homogenization problem. Int J Solids Struct 31(17):2313–2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(94)90154-610.1016/0020-7683(94)90154-6 ↗
10. Deng H (2023) An efficient MATLAB code for stress-constrained level set topology optimization method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 66(12):252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03702-w10.1007/s00158-023-03702-w ↗
11. Kendibilir A, Bilgin MH, Kefal A (2024) Coupling of bond-based peridynamics and continuous density-based topology optimization methods for effective design of three-dimensional structures with discontinuities. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01920-w10.1007/s00366-023-01920-w ↗
12. Zhang G, Khandelwal K (2019) Computational design of finite strain auxetic metamaterials via topology optimization and nonlinear homogenization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 356:490–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.07.02710.1016/j.cma.2019.07.027 ↗
13. Zheng Y, Chen Z, Liu B et al (2024) Robust topology optimization for multi-material structures considering material uncertainties. Thin-Walled Struct 201:111990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2024.11199010.1016/j.tws.2024.111990 ↗
14. Schmidt T, Kriegesmann B, Seifried R (2024) Robust contact-constrained topology optimization considering uncertainty at the contact support. Struct Multidiscip Optim 67(4):46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-024-03750-w10.1007/s00158-024-03750-w ↗
15. Gao J, Xue H, Gao L et al (2019) Topology optimization for auxetic metamaterials based on isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 352:211–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.02110.1016/j.cma.2019.04.021 ↗
16. Xia L, Breitkopf P (2015) Design of materials using topology optimization and energy-based homogenization approach in Matlab. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52(6):1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1294-010.1007/s00158-015-1294-0 ↗
17. Czarnecki S, Łukasiak T (2020) Recovery of the auxetic microstructures appearing in the least compliant continuum two-dimensional bodies. Physica Status Solidi(b) 257(10):1900676. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20190067610.1002/pssb.201900676 ↗
18. Li P, Yang F, Bian Y et al (2023) Design of lattice materials with isotropic stiffness through combination of two complementary cubic lattice configurations. Acta Mech 234(5):1843–1856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-023-03480-y10.1007/s00707-023-03480-y ↗
19. Chatterjee T, Chakraborty S, Goswami S et al (2021) Robust topological designs for extreme metamaterial micro-structures. Sci Rep 11(1):15221. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94520-x10.1038/s41598-021-94520-x ↗
20. Wilt JK, Yang C, Gu GX (2020) Accelerating auxetic metamaterial design with deep learning. Adv Eng Mater 22(5):1901266. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20207001810.1002/adem.202070018 ↗
21. Yao J, Sun R, Scarpa F et al (2021) Two-dimensional graded metamaterials with auxetic rectangular perforations. Compos Struct 261:113313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11331310.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113313 ↗
22. Lvov VA, Senatov FS, Korsunsky AM et al (2020) Design and mechanical properties of 3D-printed auxetic honeycomb structure. Mater Today Commun 24:101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10117310.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101173 ↗
23. Song Y, Yang Y, Chi C et al (2024) Mechanical characteristics of a corset type structure with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Vibro-eng 26(1):209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2298-010.1007/s10853-018-2298-0 ↗
24. Shepherd T, Winwood K, Venkatraman P et al (2020) Validation of a finite element modeling process for auxetic structures under impact. Phys Status Solidi B 257(10):1900197. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20190019710.1002/pssb.201900197 ↗
25. Davim JP (2024) Sustainable and intelligent manufacturing: perceptions in line with 2030 agenda of sustainable development. BioResources. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.1.4-510.15376/biores.19.1.4-5 ↗
26. Guedes JM, Kikuchi N (1990) Preprocessing and postprocessing for materials based on the homogenization method with adaptive finite element methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 83(2):143–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(90)90148-f10.1016/0045-7825(90)90148-f ↗
27. Wang Q, Han H, Wang C et al (2022) Topological control for 2D minimum compliance topology optimization using SIMP method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 65(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03124-610.1007/s00158-021-03124-6 ↗
28. Michel JC, Moulinec H, Suquet P (1999) Effective properties of composite materials with periodic microstructure: a computational approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 172(1–4):109–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7825(98)00227-810.1016/s0045-7825(98)00227-8 ↗
29. Xia Z, Zhang Y, Ellyin F (2003) A unified periodical boundary conditions for representative volume elements of composites and applications. Int J Solids Struct 40(8):1907–1921. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7683(03)00024-610.1016/s0020-7683(03)00024-6 ↗
30. Xia Z, Zhou C, Yong Q et al (2006) On selection of repeated unit cell model and application of unified periodic boundary conditions in micro-mechanical analysis of composites. Int J Solids Struct 43(2):266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.05510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.055 ↗
31. Sigmund O (2007) Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33:401–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0087-x10.1007/s00158-006-0087-x ↗
32. Jin X, Wang Z, Ning J et al (2016) Dynamic response of sandwich structures with graded auxetic honeycomb cores under blast loading. Compos B Eng 106:206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.03710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.037 ↗
33. Qin D, Li M, Wang T et al (2023) Design and mechanical properties of negative Poisson’s ratio structure-based topology optimization. Appl Sci 13(13):7728. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1313772810.3390/app13137728 ↗
34. Xiao D, Kang X, Li Y et al (2019) Insight into the negative Poisson’s ratio effect of metallic auxetic reentrant honeycomb under dynamic compression. Mater Sci Eng A 763:138151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13815110.1016/j.msea.2019.138151 ↗
35. Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Meth Eng 24(2):359–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162024020710.1002/nme.1620240207 ↗
36. Andreassen E, Clausen A, Schevenels M et al (2011) Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0594-710.1007/s00158-010-0594-7 ↗
37. Höing A, Stronge W (2020) In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycomb. Part I: Crush band initiation and wave trapping. Int J Mech Sci 44(8):1665–1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7403(02)00060-710.1016/s0020-7403(02)00060-7 ↗
38. Zou Z, Reid SR, Tan PJ et al (2007) Dynamic crushing of honeycombs and features of shock fronts. Int J Impact Eng 36(1):165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.008 ↗
39. Hang XC, An LQ, Ding HM (2014) Dynamic crushing behavior and energy absorption of honeycombs with density gradient. J Sandwich Struct Mater 16(2):125–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/109963621350909910.1177/1099636213509099 ↗
40. Spadoni A, Ruzzene M (2012) Elasto-static micropolar behavior of a chiral auxetic lattice. J Mech Phys Solids 60(1):156–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.01210.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.012 ↗
41. Chen Z, Wang Z, Zhou S et al (2018) Novel negative Poisson’s ratio lattice structures with enhanced stiffness and energy absorption capacity. Materials 11(7):1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1107109510.3390/ma11071095 ↗
42. Gibson IJ, Ashby MF (1982) The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 382(1782):43–59. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.160153610.1126/sciadv.1601536 ↗
43. Mauko A, Fíla T, Falta J et al (2020) Dynamic deformation behaviour of chiral auxetic lattices at low and high strain-rates. Metals 11(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1101005210.3390/met11010052 ↗
44. Li QM, Magkiriadis I, Harrigan JJ (2006) Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids. J Cell Plast 42(5):371–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955x0606351910.1177/0021955x06063519 ↗