Investigating the influence of fabrication parameters, flax fibre reinforcement, and ageing on interlaminar shear strength in thermoplastic-bonded wood veneers
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the suitability of two thermoplastic polymers that are non-toxic and environmentally friendly, namely polylactic acid (PLA) and recycled maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (rMAPP), as potential alternatives to formaldehyde-based adhesives in plywood production. Two types of rotary cut wood veneers, beech and Douglas fir, are tested. The performance of interfaces is evaluated using interlaminar shear strength tests and compared to those obtained with a benchmark polyvinyl glue. This study examines the manufacturing process settings on interlaminar shear strength, as well as the influence of incorporating plant fibre reinforcement into the adhesive. It also evaluates the effects of accelerated ageing on the shear strength. The results indicate that manufacturing parameters tested within the specified range have a limited impact on shear strength. Both rMAPP and polyvinyl glue exhibit similar performance. This strong adhesion obtained with rMAPP is attributed to the formation of covalent bonds between the maleic anhydride (MA) and the hydroxyl groups within the amorphous constituents of the wood cell wall and to mechanical interlocking resulting from the polymer’s efficient penetration into the various wood pore structures, including cell lumens and lathe checks. The incorporation of flax fibres enhances interface performance under ambient conditions but has a negative effect in the case of hygro- and hydrothermal accelerated ageing. The results with PLA adhesive show more varied outcomes, with lower shear strength when manufactured via vacuum bagging technique. Furthermore, the performance of PLA adhesive does not meet plywood ageing standards due to its moisture sensitivity and susceptibility to hydrolysis degradation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Wood Treatment and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. ANSES; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (2019) Substance evaluation conclusion as required by REACH Article 48 and evaluation report for FORMALDEHYDE (EC No 200-001-8 CAS No 50-00-0)
2. Ferdosian F, Pan Z, Gao G, Zhao B (2017) Bio-based adhesives and evaluation for wood composites application. Polymers 9(12):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym902007010.3390/polym9020070 ↗
3. Mansouri N-EE, Pizzi A, Salvado J (2007) Lignin-based polycondensation resins for wood adhesives. J Appl Polym Sci 103(3):1690–1699. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2509810.1002/app.25098 ↗
4. Gonçalves D, Bordado JM, Marques AC, Galhano dos Santos R (2021) Non-formaldehyde, bio-based adhesives for use in wood-based panel manufacturing industry—a review. Polymers 13(23):4086. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1323408610.3390/polym13234086 ↗
5. Ang AF, Ashaari Z, Lee SH et al (2019) Lignin-based copolymer adhesives for composite wood panels – A review. Int J Adhes Adhes 95:102408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10240810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102408 ↗
6. Antov P, Savov V, Neykov N (2020) Sustainable bio-based adhesives for eco-friendly wood composites: a review. Wood Res 65:51–6210.37763/wr.1336-4561/65.1.051062 ↗
7. Geng X, Li K (2006) Investigation of wood adhesives from kraft lignin and polyethylenimine. J Adhes Sci Technol 20(8):847–858. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685610677763869910.1163/156856106777638699 ↗
8. Li K, Geng X, Simonsen J, Karchesy J (2004) Novel wood adhesives from condensed tannins and polyethylenimine. Int J Adhes Adhes 24(4):327–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.11.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.11.004 ↗
9. Bekhta P, Müller M, Hunko I (2020) Properties of thermoplastic-bonded plywood: effects of the wood species and types of the thermoplastic films. Polymers 12(11):2582. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1211258210.3390/polym12112582 ↗
10. Kajaks J, Kalnins K, Reihmane S, Bernava A (2014) Recycled thermoplastic polymer hot melts utilization for birch wood veneer bonding. Prog Rubber Plast Recycl Technol 30:87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/14777606140300020210.1177/147776061403000202 ↗
11. Song W, Wei W, Li X, Zhang S (2016) Utilization of polypropylene film as an adhesive to prepare formaldehyde-free, weather-resistant plywood-like composites: process optimization, performance evaluation, and interface modification. BioResources 12(1):228–254. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.1.228-25410.15376/biores.12.1.228-254 ↗
12. Gaugler M, Luedtke J, Grigsby WJ, Krause A (2019) A new methodology for rapidly assessing interfacial bonding within fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Int J Adhes Adhes 89:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.010 ↗
13. Luedtke J, Gaugler M, Grigsby WJ, Krause A (2019) Understanding the development of interfacial bonding within PLA/wood-based thermoplastic sandwich composites. Ind Crops Prod 127:129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.06910.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.069 ↗
14. Grigsby WJ, Puri A, Gaugler M, Lüedtke J, Krause A (2020) Bonding wood veneer with biobased poly(lactic acid) thermoplastic polyesters: potential applications for consolidated wood veneer and overlay products. Fibers 8:50. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib808005010.3390/fib8080050 ↗
15. Bal BC, Bektaş İ, Mengeloğlu F, Karakuş K, Ökkeş Demir H (2015) Some technological properties of poplar plywood panels reinforced with glass fiber fabric. Constr Build Mater 101:952–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.15210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.152 ↗
16. Jorda J, Kain G, Barbu M-C, Petutschnigg A, Král P (2021) Influence of adhesive systems on the mechanical and physical properties of flax fiber reinforced beech plywood. Polymers 13(18):3086. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1318308610.3390/polym13183086 ↗
17. Xu H, Nakao T, Tanaka C, Yoshinobu M, Katayama H (1998) Effects of fiber length and orientation on elasticity of fiber-reinforced plywood. J Wood Sci 44(5):343–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0113044510.1007/BF01130445 ↗
18. Kramár S, Trcala M, Chitbanyong K, et al (2020) Basalt-fiber-reinforced polyvinyl acetate resin: a coating for ductile plywood panels. Materials 13(1):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1301004910.3390/ma13010049 ↗
19. Choi SW, Li M, Lee WI, Kim HS (2014) Analysis of buckling load of glass fiber/epoxy-reinforced plywood and its temperature dependence. J Compos Mater 48(18):2191–2206. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831349507110.1177/0021998313495071 ↗
20. Arya S, Kumar R, Chauhan S, Kelkar BU (2023) Development of natural fiber reinforced thermoplastic bonded hybrid wood veneer composite. Constr Build Mater 368:130459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13045910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130459 ↗
21. Jorda J, Kain G, Barbu M-C, Köll B, Petutschnigg A, Král P (2022) Mechanical properties of cellulose and flax fiber unidirectional reinforced plywood. Polymers 14(4):843. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1404084310.3390/polym14040843 ↗
22. Hardwood Plywood & Veneer Association, DBA Decorative Hardwoods Association (2020) ANSI/HPVA HP-1-2020
23. Banjo AD, Agrawal V, Auad ML, Celestine A-DN (2022) Moisture-induced changes in the mechanical behavior of 3D printed polymers. Composites Part C: Open Access 7:100243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2022.10024310.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100243 ↗
24. Yang H-S, Wolcott MP, Kim H-S, Kim S, Kim H-J (2007) Effect of different compatibilizing agents on the mechanical properties of lignocellulosic material filled polyethylene bio-composites. Compos Struct 79(3):369–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.016 ↗
25. Felix JM, Gatenholm P (1991) The nature of adhesion in composites of modified cellulose fibers and polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci 42(3):609–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1991.07042030710.1002/app.1991.070420307 ↗
26. Demirkir C, Colakoglu G, Colak S, Aydin I, Candan Z (2016) Influence of aging procedure on bonding strength and thermal conductivity of plywood panels. Acta Phys Pol A 129(6):1230–1234. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.129.123010.12693/APhysPolA.129.1230 ↗
27. Senalik CA, Ross R, Zelinka S, Lebow S, Cai Z (2017) Accelerated aging of preservative-treated structural plywood. Unpublished manuscript. https://doi.org/10.2737/FPL-RP-69110.2737/FPL-RP-691 ↗
28. Assarar M, Scida D, El Mahi A, Poilâne C, Ayad R (2011) Influence of water ageing on mechanical properties and damage events of two reinforced composite materials: flax–fibres and glass–fibres. Mater Des 32(2):788–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.02410.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.024 ↗
29. Ghasemzadeh-Barvarz M, Duchesne C, Rodrigue D (2015) Mechanical, water absorption, and aging properties of polypropylene/flax/glass fiber hybrid composites. J Compos Mater 49(30):3781–3798. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831456857610.1177/0021998314568576 ↗
30. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances 3(7):e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.170078210.1126/sciadv.1700782 ↗
31. Plastics Europe (2022) PE-plastics-the-facts_final_digital-1
32. Ellis WD, O’Dell JL (1999) Wood-polymer composites made with acrylic monomers, isocyanate, and maleic anhydride. J Appl Polym Sci 73(12):2493–2505. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990919)73:12%3c2493::AID-APP18%3e3.0.CO;2-C10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990919)73:12<2493::AID-APP18>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
33. Vink ETH, Rábago KR, Glassner DA, Gruber PR (2003) Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorks™ polylactide (PLA) production. Polym Degrad Stab 80(3):403–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00372-510.1016/S0141-3910(02)00372-5 ↗
34. Skoczinski P, Carus M, Tweddle G, Ruiz P, Hark N, Zhang A, De Guzman D, Ravenstijn J, Käb H, Raschka A (2024) Bio-based building blocks and polymers—global capacities, production and trends 2023–2028 nova-Institut GmbH. https://doi.org/10.52548/VXTH241610.52548/VXTH2416 ↗
35. Van de Velde K, Baetens E (2001) Thermal and mechanical properties of flax fibres as potential composite reinforcement. Macromol Mater Eng 286(6):342–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/1439-2054(20010601)286:6%3c342::AID-MAME342%3e3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/1439-2054(20010601)286:6<342::AID-MAME342>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
36. Avat F (1993) Contribution à l’étude des traitements thermiques du bois jusqu’à 300 °C: transformations chimiques et caractérisations physico-chimiques, p 363
37. Scida D, Assarar M, Poilâne C, Ayad R (2013) Influence of hygrothermal ageing on the damage mechanisms of flax-fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Compos B Eng 48:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.12.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.12.010 ↗
38. Kajaks J, Reihmane S, Grinbergs U, Kalnins K (2012) Use of innovative environmentally friendly adhesives for wood veneer bonding. Proc Estonian Acad Sci 61(3):207. https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2012.3.1010.3176/proc.2012.3.10 ↗
39. Viguier J, Bourreau D, Bocquet J-F, Pot G, Bléron L, Lanvin J-D (2017) Modelling mechanical properties of spruce and Douglas fir timber by means of X-ray and grain angle measurements for strength grading purpose. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 75(4):527–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-016-1149-410.1007/s00107-016-1149-4 ↗
40. Burdurlu E, Kilic M, Ilce AC, Uzunkavak O (2007) The effects of ply organization and loading direction on bending strength and modulus of elasticity in laminated veneer lumber (LVL) obtained from beech (Fagus orientalis L.) and lombardy poplar (Populus nigra L.). Constr Build Mater 21(8):1720–1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.05.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.05.002 ↗
41. Han L, Han C, Dong L (2013) Effect of crystallization on microstructure and mechanical properties of poly[(ethylene oxide)-block-(amide-12)]-toughened poly(lactic acid) blend. Polym Int 62(2):295–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.430010.1002/pi.4300 ↗
42. Castanié B, Peignon A, Marc C, Eyma F, Cantarel A, Serra J, Curti R, Hadiji H, Denaud L, Girardon S, Marcon B (2024) Wood and plywood as eco-materials for sustainable mobility: a review. Compos Struct 329:117790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11779010.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117790 ↗
43. Kamke FA, Lee JN (2007) Adhesive penetration in wood—a review. Wood Fiber Sci 39:205–220
44. Frihart CR (2012) Wood adhesion and adhesives. In: Rowell RM (ed) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. CRC Press, pp 234–271. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12487-1310.1201/b12487-13 ↗
45. Ebewele RO, River BH, Koutsky JA (1986) Relationship between phenolic adhesive chemistry and adhesive joint performance: effect of filler type on fraction energy. J Appl Polym Sci 31(7):2275–2302. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1986.07031072610.1002/app.1986.070310726 ↗
46. Siau JF (1984) Transport processes in wood. Springer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-642-69213-0 ↗
47. Marra AA (1992) Technology of wood bonding: principles in practice. Springer US
48. Pizzi A, Leban J-M, Kanazawa F, Properzi M, Pichelin F (2004) Wood dowel bonding by high-speed rotation welding. J Adhes Sci Technol 18(11):1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856104158819210.1163/1568561041588192 ↗
49. NISKA KO, SANADI AR (2008) 3 - Interactions between wood and synthetic polymers. In: Niska KO, Sain M (eds) Wood–polymer composites. Woodhead Publishing, pp 41–7110.1533/9781845694579.41 ↗
50. Konnerth J, Gindl W (2006) Mechanical characterisation of wood-adhesive interphase cell walls by nanoindentation. Holzforschung 60(4):429–433. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2006.06710.1515/HF.2006.067 ↗
51. Kajita H, Imamura Y (1991) Improvement of physical and biological properties of particleboards by impregnation with phenolic resin. Wood Sci Technol 26:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0022569210.1007/BF00225692 ↗