On the optimisation of phase fractions in harmonic structure materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Materials with heterogeneous microstructures architected across several scales are becoming increasingly popular in structural applications due to unique strength–ductility balance. One of the most popular 3D-architected structure designs is harmonic structure (HS) where soft coarse-grain (CG) islands are embedded in a hard continuous 3D skeleton of ultrafine grains (UFGs). In this work, a series of HS with varying phase fractions and rheologies are studied based on several models. Model A focuses on a good fit with experimental data in the elastic–plastic transition region, model B focuses on a good fit at large-scale yielding, while in five intermediate models, phase rheology parameters are varied on a linear scale between the values for A and B. For each of the seven selected HS material models, structures with 19 different volumetric fractions of UFG were examined. It is found that the increase of UFG fraction leads to the monotonic increase of strength characteristics in HS material, while higher strain hardening rates in the phases lead to the enhancement of this effect. By contrast, the dependence of ductility characteristics on UFG fraction is non-monotonic having a local minimum at 30% UFG and a maximum at 60% UFG, while also significantly dependent on strain hardening in the phases. Namely, HS material with phases having significant strain hardening reveals the highest uniform elongation exceeding that in 100% CG material already at 40% UFG fraction. The fractions of UFG in a range of 58–62% form HS material with the highest possible uniform elongation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Wave Propagation · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Structural mechanics and materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Edalati K et al (2022) Nanomaterials by severe plastic deformation: review of historical developments and recent advances. Mater Res Lett 10:163–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2022.202977910.1080/21663831.2022.2029779 ↗
2. Estrin Y, Vinogradov A (2013) Extreme grain refinement by severe plastic deformation: a wealth of challenging science. Acta Mater 61:782–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.03810.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.038 ↗
3. Gleiter H (1989) Nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 33:223–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-710.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-7 ↗
4. Meyers MA, Mishra A, Benson DJ (2006) Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 51:427–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
5. Ovid’ko IA, Valiev RZ, Zhu YT (2018) Review on superior strength and enhanced ductility of metallic nanomaterials. Prog Mater Sci 94:462–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.002 ↗
6. Zhu Y et al (2021) Heterostructured materials: superior properties from hetero-zone interaction. Mater Res Lett 9:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2020.179683610.1080/21663831.2020.1796836 ↗
7. Wang Y, Chen M, Zhou F, Ma E (2002) High tensile ductility in a nanostructured metal. Nature 419:912–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0113310.1038/nature01133 ↗
8. Ameyama K et al (2022) Harmonic structure, a promising microstructure design. Mater Res Lett 10:440–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2022.205720310.1080/21663831.2022.2057203 ↗
9. Orlov D, Ameyama K (2020) Critical assessment 37: harmonic-structure materials - idea, status and perspectives. Mater Sci Technol 36:517–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2020.171930610.1080/02670836.2020.1719306 ↗
10. Orlov D, Fujiwara H, Ameyama K (2013) Obtaining copper with harmonic structure for the optimal balance of structure-performance relationship. Mater Trans 54:1549–1553. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MH20132010.2320/matertrans.MH201320 ↗
11. Ameyama K, Fujiwara H (2012) Creation of harmonic structure materials with outstanding mechanical properties. Mater Sci Forum 706–709:9–16. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.706-709.910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.706-709.9 ↗
12. Vajpai SK, Ota M, Zhang Z, Ameyama K (2016) Three-dimensionally gradient harmonic structure design: an integrated approach for high performance structural materials. Mater Res Lett 4:191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2016.121896510.1080/21663831.2016.1218965 ↗
13. Zhang Z, Orlov D, Vajpai SK, Tong B, Ameyama K (2015) Importance of bimodal structure topology in the control of mechanical properties of a stainless steel. Adv Eng Mater 17:791–795. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20140035810.1002/adem.201400358 ↗
14. Zhang Z, Vajpai SK, Orlov D, Ameyama K (2014) Improvement of mechanical properties in SUS304L steel through the control of bimodal microstructure characteristics. Mater Sci Eng, A 598:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.02310.1016/j.msea.2014.01.023 ↗
15. Vajpai SK et al (2015) The development of high performance Ti-6Al-4V alloy via a unique microstructural design with bimodal grain size distribution. Metall Mater Trans A 46:903–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2649-710.1007/s11661-014-2649-7 ↗
16. Kikuchi S, Takemura K, Hayami Y, Ueno A, Ameyama K (2015) Evaluation of the fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with harmonic structure in 4-points bending. J Soc Mater Sci, Japan 64:880–886. https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.64.88010.2472/jsms.64.880 ↗
17. Dirras G, Ota M, Tingaud D, Ameyama K, Sekiguchi T (2015) Microstructure evolution during direct impact loading of commercial purity of titanium with harmonic structure design. Matériaux Tech 103:311. https://doi.org/10.1051/ma]ech/201503110.1051/ma]ech/2015031 ↗
18. Nagata M, Horikawa N, Kawabata M, Ameyama K (2019) Effects of microstructure on mechanical properties of harmonic structure designed pure Ni. Mater Trans 60:1914–1920. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MT-M201914510.2320/matertrans.MT-M2019145 ↗
19. Orlov D, Zhou J, Hall S, Ota-Kawabata M, Ameyama K (2019) Advantages of architectured harmonic structure in structural performance. IOP Conf Series: Mater Sci Eng 580:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/580/1/01201910.1088/1757-899x/580/1/012019 ↗
20. Latypov MI, Alexandrov IV, Beygelzimer YE, Lee S, Kim HS (2012) Finite element analysis of plastic deformation in twist extrusion. Comput Mater Sci 60:194–20010.1016/j.commatsci.2012.03.035 ↗
21. Kim JH, Lee MG, Kang JH, Oh CS, Barlat F (2017) Crystal plasticity finite element analysis of ferritic stainless steel for sheet formability prediction. Int J Plast 93:26–4510.1016/j.ijplas.2017.04.007 ↗
22. Lim H, Bong HJ, Chen SR, Rodgers TM, Babaile CC, Lane JMD (2018) Developing anisotropic yield models of polycrystalline tantalum using crystal plasticity finite element simulations. Mater Sci Eng, A 730:50–5610.1016/j.msea.2018.05.096 ↗
23. Kim JG, Latypov M, Pardis N, Beygelzimer YE, Kim HS (2015) Finite element analysis of the plastic deformation in tandem process of simple shear extrusion and twist extrusion. Mater Design 83:858–86510.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.034 ↗
24. Vinogradov A, Estrin Y (2018) Analytical and numerical approaches to modelling severe plastic deformation. Prog Mater Sci 95:172–24210.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.001 ↗
25. Moradpour M, Khodabakhshi F, Mohebpour SR, Eskandari H, Haghshenas M (2019) Finite element modeling and experimental validation of CGP classical and new cross routes for severe plastic deformation of an Al-Mg alloy. J Manuf Process 37:348–36110.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.009 ↗
26. Shimokawa T, Hasegawa T, Kiyota K, Niiyama T, Ameyama K (2022) Heterogeneous evolution of lattice defects leading to high strength and high ductility in harmonic structure materials through atomic and dislocation simulations. Acta Mater 226(117679):1–15
27. Wang X, Cazes FB, Li J, Hocini A, Ameyama K, Dirras G (2019) A 3D crystal plasticity model of monotonic and cyclic simple shear deformation for commercial-purity polycrystalline Ti with a harmonic structure. Mech Mater 128:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.10.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2018.10.006 ↗
28. Shokry A, Ahadi A, Ståhle P, Orlov D (2021) Improvement of structural efficiency in metals by the control of topological arrangements in ultrafine and coarse grains. Sci Rep 11(1):1–1410.1038/s41598-021-96930-3 ↗
29. Nickel – Element information, properties and uses, http://www.rsc.org, Royal Society of Chemistry. Read July 29 (2022)
30. Orlov D, Kulagin R, Beygelzimer Y (2020) Strain partitioning and back-stress evaluation in harmonic-structure materials. Mater Lett 275:128126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12812610.1016/j.matlet.2020.128126 ↗
31. Sjögren-Levin E et al (2023) Stress partitioning in harmonic structure materials at the early stages of tensile loading studied in situ by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Scripta Materialia 226:115–18610.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115186 ↗
32. Beigelzimer JAE, Efros BM, Varyukhin VN, Khokhlov AV (1994) A continuum model of a structurally inhomogeneous porous body and its application for the study of stability and viscous fracture of materials deformed under pressure. Eng Fract Mech 48(5):629–64010.1016/0013-7944(94)90170-8 ↗
33. Beygelzimer Y (2005) Grain refinement versus voids accumulation during severe plastic deformations of polycrystals: mathematical simulation. Mech Mater 37:753–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2004.07.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2004.07.006 ↗
34. Smith M (2009) ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manual vers. 6.13, Dassault Systèmes
35. Kolmogorov AN, Delaunay BN (1969) Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning, chapter Analytic Geometry. MIT Press, Boston, USA
36. Sawangrat C, Kato S, Orlov D, Ameyama K (2014) Harmonic-structured copper: performance and proof of fabrication concept based on severe plastic deformation of powders. J Mater Sci 49:6579–658510.1007/s10853-014-8258-4 ↗