journal article·2024-01

New method for position and energy controlled surface mechanical attrition treatment and its effects in 304 stainless steel

Samuel Scott, Mark Atwater

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Gradient nanograin metals (GNMs) are of great interest due to their strength and retention of ductility. These microstructures are often created using surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT), which coldworks a surface through numerous impacts from ball bearings. Recently, the use of short-duration SMAT to form planar heterogeneous GNMs has been proposed as a method to control mechanical properties by applying nonoverlapping impacts on a coarse grained metal, where the degree of surface coverage may be used to dictate the strength-ductility balance. While clear trends between the surface coverage and mechanical properties have been reported, there has been no means to precisely dictate the impact characteristics. To remove randomness from the surface impact process, a position and energy controlled SMAT (PECSMAT) impactor was developed to create planar heterogeneous GNMs with patterned arrays of indents. Computer numerical control and energy measurement allow the indenter to record the deformation energy of each impacted site. This industrially relevant approach enables direct translation into current industrial processing and enables unique research on nanograin formation as a function of plastic deformation energy, impact number, overlap, angle, diameter, and more. The impactor was found to have positional variation of less than 17 μm, while the plastic deformation energy of each impact varies less than 8.9% of the desired set-point value. The utility of this approach is demonstrated in 304 stainless steel, with the strength of the material controlled by varying indent surface coverage, allowing 70% increase in yield strength with only 17% decrease in ductility under the conditions tested.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Erosion and Abrasive Machining

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Ma E, Zhu T (2017) Towards strength–ductility synergy through the design of heterogeneous nanostructures in metals. Mater Today 20(6):323–33110.1016/j.mattod.2017.02.003 ↗
2. Wu X, Jiang P, Chen L, Yuan F, Zhu YT (2014) Extraordinary strain hardening by gradient structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(20):7197–720110.1073/pnas.1324069111 ↗
3. Zhu, Y, Wu, X (2022) Heterostructured materials. Prog Mater Sci 10101910.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101019 ↗
4. Liu X, Wu K, Wu G, Gao Y, Zhu L, Lu Y, Lu J (2016) High strength and high ductility copper obtained by topologically controlled planar heterogeneous structures. Scripta Mater 124:103–10710.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.07.003 ↗
5. Yang Y, Gong Y, Li X, Liu H, Li C, Yang J, Pan H, Shu B, Deng C, Fang J, Zhu X (2022) Effect of bimodal grain size and gradient structure on heterogeneous deformation induced (HDI) stress and mechanical properties of Cu. Mater Res Express. 9(3):03500410.1088/2053-1591/ac5a37 ↗
6. Chen A, Liu J, Wang H, Lu J, Wang YM (2016) Gradient twinned 304 stainless steels for high strength and high ductility. Mater Sci Eng, A 667:179–18810.1016/j.msea.2016.04.070 ↗
7. Ashby M (1970) The deformation of plastically non-homogeneous materials. Philos Mag: J Theor Exp Appl Phys 21(170):399–42410.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
8. Zhu Y, Wu X (2019) Perspective on hetero-deformation induced (HDI) hardening and back stress. Mater Res Lett 7(10):393–39810.1080/21663831.2019.1616331 ↗
9. Yuan F, Yan D, Sun J, Zhou L, Zhu Y, Wu X (2019) Ductility by shear band delocalization in the nano-layer of gradient structure. Mater Res Lett 7(1):12–1710.1080/21663831.2018.1546238 ↗
10. Li J, Weng GJ, Chen S, Wu X (2017) On strain hardening mechanism in gradient nanostructures. Int J Plast 88:89–10710.1016/j.ijplas.2016.10.003 ↗
11. Suresh S (2001) Graded materials for resistance to contact deformation and damage. Science 292(5526):2447–245110.1126/science.1059716 ↗
12. Olugbade TO, Lu J (2020) Literature review on the mechanical properties of materials after surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT). Nano Mater Sci 2(1):3–3110.1016/j.nanoms.2020.04.002 ↗
13. Wu XL, Yang MX, Yuan FP, Chen L, Zhu YT (2016) Combining gradient structure and TRIP effect to produce austenite stainless steel with high strength and ductility. Acta Mater 112:337–34610.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.045 ↗
14. Lu K, Lu J (2004) Nanostructured surface layer on metallic materials induced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Mater Sci Eng, A 375–377:38–4510.1016/j.msea.2003.10.261 ↗
15. Chen AY, Ruan HH, Wang J, Chan HL, Wang Q, Li Q, Lu J (2011) The influence of strain rate on the microstructure transition of 304 stainless steel. Acta Mater 59(9):3697–370910.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.005 ↗
16. Liu X, Nakatani M, Gao H, Sharma B, Pan H, Fu Z, Zhu X (2021) Effect of stacking fault energy on deformation mechanisms in Cu and Cu-30% Zn alloy with gradient structure obtained by SMAT. J Alloys Compd 865:15886310.1016/j.jallcom.2021.158863 ↗
17. Umemoto M, Huang B, Tsuchiya K, Suzuki N (2002) Formation of nanocrystalline structure in steels by ball drop test. Scripta Mater 46(5):383–38810.1016/S1359-6462(01)01258-1 ↗
18. Umemoto M, Todaka Y, Tsuchiya K (2003) Formation of nanocrystalline structure in steels by air blast shot peening. Mater T JIM 44(7):1488–149310.2320/matertrans.44.1488 ↗
19. Umemoto M, Todaka Y, Tsuchiya K (2004) Formation of nanocrystalline structure in carbon steels by ball drop and particle impact techniques. Mater Sci Eng, A 375–377:899–90410.1016/j.msea.2003.10.198 ↗
20. Kodeeswaran M, Gnanamoorthy R (2012) A novel controlled impact process for the formation of nanostructured surface in AISI304 stainless steel. Surf Coat Technol 207:227–23210.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.06.076 ↗
21. Bleicher F, Lechner C, Habersohn C, Kozeschnik E, Adjassoho B, Kaminski H (2012) Mechanism of surface modification using machine hammer peening technology. CIRP Ann 61(1):375–37810.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.139 ↗
22. Chan WL, Cheng HKF (2022) Hammer peening technology: the past, present, and future. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 118(3):683–70110.1007/s00170-021-07993-5 ↗
23. Mannens R, Uhlmann L, Feuerhack A, Bergs T (2021) Energy-dependent surface integrity of stainless steel AISI 304 after robot-based machine hammer peening. Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-75381-8_156 ↗
24. Naghizadeh M, Mirzadeh H (2019) Effects of grain size on mechanical properties and work-hardening behavior of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Steel Res Int 90(10):190015310.1002/srin.201900153 ↗
25. International A (2021) ASTM E8/E8M-21 Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials
26. Almen JO, Black PH (1963) Residual stresses and fatigue in metals, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, p 226
27. International A (2014) ASTM E1558-09 Standard guide for electrolytic polishing of metallographic specimens
28. Yin F, Liu Y, Xu R, Zhao K, Partin A, Han Q (2018) Nanograined surface fabricated on the pure copper by ultrasonic shot peening and an energy-density based criterion for peening intensity quantification. J Manuf Process 32:656–66310.1016/j.jmapro.2018.04.003 ↗
29. Wu C-Y, Li L-Y, Thornton C (2005) Energy dissipation during normal impact of elastic and elastic–plastic spheres. Int J Impact Eng 32(1):593–60410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.007 ↗
30. Maranzano BJ, Hancock BC (2016) Quantitative analysis of impact measurements using dynamic load cells. Sens Bio-Sens Res 7:31–3710.1016/j.sbsr.2015.11.005 ↗
31. Li H, Chen W, Hao H (2020) Factors influencing impact force profile and measurement accuracy in drop weight impact tests. Int J Impact Eng 145:10368810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103688 ↗
32. Narasimhappa M, Mahindrakar AD, Guizilini VC, Terra MH, Sabat SL (2020) MEMS-based IMU drift minimization: sage husa adaptive robust kalman filtering. IEEE Sens J 20(1):250–26010.1109/JSEN.2019.2941273 ↗
33. Yanushkevich Z, Mogucheva A, Tikhonova M, Belyakov A, Kaibyshev R (2011) Structural strengthening of an austenitic stainless steel subjected to warm-to-hot working. Mater Charact 62(4):432–43710.1016/j.matchar.2011.02.005 ↗
34. Li H, Fu M, (2019) Deformation-based processing of materials. 1(ed) Elsevier, p 35010.1016/B978-0-12-814381-0.00001-7 ↗
35. Zhang X, Lu J, Shi S (2011) A computational study of plastic deformation in AISI 304 Induced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Mech Adv Mater Struct 18(8):572–57710.1080/15376494.2011.621828 ↗
36. Cao SC, Zhang X, Lu J, Wang Y, Shi S-Q, Ritchie RO (2019) Predicting surface deformation during mechanical attrition of metallic alloys. NPJ Comput Mater 5(1):1–1510.1038/s41524-019-0171-6 ↗
37. Dai K, Shaw L (2007) Comparison between shot peening and surface nanocrystallization and hardening processes. Mater Sci Eng, A 463(1):46–5310.1016/j.msea.2006.07.159 ↗
38. Zhu L, Guo X, Ruan H (2016) Simulating size and volume fraction-dependent strength and ductility of nanotwinned composite copper. J Appl Mech 83(7):07100910.1115/1.4033519 ↗
39. Sharp P, Clayton J, Clark G (1994) THE fatigue resistance of peened 7050–T7451 aluminium alloy: repair and re-treatment of a component surface. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 17(3):243–25210.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00226.x ↗
40. Budynas RG (1999) Advanced strength and applied stress analysis. McGraw-Hill Education.
41. Lee S, Pegues JW, Shamsaei N (2020) Fatigue behavior and modeling for additive manufactured 304L stainless steel: the effect of surface roughness. Int J Fatigue 141:10585610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105856 ↗
42. McAdam DJ, Clyne W (1934) Influence of chemically and mechanically formed notches on fatigue of metals. J Res Natl Bur Stand 13:527–57210.6028/jres.013.037 ↗
43. Yang S, Zeng W, Yang J (2020) Characterization of shot peening properties and modelling on the fatigue performance of 304 austenitic stainless steel. Int J Fatigue 137:10562110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105621 ↗
44. Arifvianto B, Mahardika M (2012) Effects of surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) on a rough surface of AISI 316L stainless steel. Appl Surf Sci 258(10):4538–454310.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.021 ↗
45. Gao P, Sun Z, Retraint D (2022) Literature review on the fatigue properties of materials processed by surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT). Metals 12(5):77510.3390/met12050775 ↗