Impact of Ti4O7 conductive additive in NCM111 cathode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Extraction and Separation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Blecua De Pedro M, Ponce CH, De Meatza I et al (2023) Environmental and economic assessment of a higher energy density and safer operation lithium-ion cell for stationary applications. Sustain Mater Technol 37:e00704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e0070410.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00704 ↗
2. Lu Y (2024) Study on the performance of lithium iron phosphate battery based on its application in transportation field. J Phys: Conf Ser 2798:012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2798/1/01201910.1088/1742-6596/2798/1/012019 ↗
3. Chen Y, Kang Y, Zhao Y et al (2021) A review of lithium-ion battery safety concerns: the issues, strategies, and testing standards. J Energy Chem 59:83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.01710.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.017 ↗
4. Guan P, Zhou L, Yu Z et al (2020) Recent progress of surface coating on cathode materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. J Energy Chem 43:220–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.08.02210.1016/j.jechem.2019.08.022 ↗
5. Jung C-H, Shim H, Eum D, Hong S-H (2021) Challenges and recent progress in LiNixCoyMn1−x−yO2 (NCM) cathodes for lithium ion batteries. J Korean Ceram Soc 58:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43207-020-00098-x10.1007/s43207-020-00098-x ↗
6. Wang Y, Zhao D, Zhang K et al (2020) Enhancing the rate performance of high-capacity LiNi0.8Co01.5Al0.05O2 cathode materials by using Ti4O7 as a conductive additive. J Energy Storage 28:101182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.10118210.1016/j.est.2019.101182 ↗
7. Liu J, Zou Z, Zhang S, Zhang H (2021) Structure, modification, and commercialization of high nickel ternary material (LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 and LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2) for lithium ion batteries. J Solid State Electrochem 25:387–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-020-04818-510.1007/s10008-020-04818-5 ↗
8. Zhang X, Li S, Wang S et al (2021) An amorphous hierarchical MnO2/acetylene black composite with boosted rate performance as an anode for lithium-ion batteries. Dalton Trans 50:10749–10757. https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-02910.15223/policy-029 ↗
9. Yang X, Wu L, Hou J et al (2022) Symmetrical growth of carbon nanotube arrays on FeSiAl micro-flake for enhancement of lithium-ion battery capacity. Carbon 189:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00449-010.1007/s42823-022-00449-0 ↗
10. Zhang H, Zhang J (2021) An overview of modification strategies to improve LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) cathode performance for automotive lithium-ion batteries. ETransportation 7:100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etran.2021.10010510.1016/j.etran.2021.100105 ↗
11. Wang F, Lin S, Lu X et al (2022) Poly-dopamine carbon-coated stable silicon/graphene/CNT com-posite as anode for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 404:139708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13970810.1016/j.electacta.2021.139708 ↗
12. Li L, Zhang D, Deng J et al (2021) Carbon-based materials for fast charging lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 183:721–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.05310.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.053 ↗
13. Guo J, Ma G, Hu K et al (2022) Effect of acetylene black and carbon nanotube interlayer on polyethylene glycol–coated sulfur composite cathode. Ionics 28:619–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-021-04357-710.1007/s11581-021-04357-7 ↗
14. Jiang X, Chen Y, Meng X et al (2022) The impact of electrode with carbon materials on safety performance of lithium-ion batteries: a review. Carbon 191:448–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.01110.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.011 ↗
15. Kang MS, Park SK, Nakhanivej P et al (2021) Mesoporous VO2(B) nanorods deposited onto graphene architectures for enhanced rate capability and cycle life of Li ion battery cathodes. J Alloy Compd 855:157361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15736110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157361 ↗
16. Tu S, Su H, Sui D et al (2021) Mesoporous carbon nanomaterials with tunable geometries and porous structures fabricated by a surface-induced assembly strategy. Energy Storage Mater 35:602–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.11.04210.1016/j.ensm.2020.11.042 ↗
17. Tu S, Chen Z, Zhang B et al (2022) Realizing high utilization of high-mass-loading sulfur cathode via electrode nanopore regulation. Nano Lett 22:5982–5989. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0225810.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02258 ↗
18. Li J, Liu Z, Wang Y, Wang R (2020) Investigation of facial B2O3 surface modification effect on the cycling stability and high-rate capacity of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode. J Alloy Compd 834:155150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15515010.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155150 ↗
19. Ma L, Yu L-J, Liu J et al (2022) Construction of Ti4O7/TiN/carbon microdisk sulfur host with strong polar N-Ti–O bond for ultralong life lithium–sulfur battery. Energy Storage Mater 44:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.02410.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.024 ↗
20. Kumar A, Barbhuiya NH, Singh SP (2022) Magnéli phase titanium sub-oxides synthesis, fabrication and its application for environmental remediation: Current status and prospect. Chemosphere 307:135878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13587810.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135878 ↗
21. Liu HJ, Luo MQ, Yang LX et al (2022) A high strength and conductivity bulk Magnéli phase Ti4O7 with superior electrochemical performance. Ceram Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.23310.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.233 ↗
22. Lee S, Lee G-H, Kim J-C, Kim D-W (2018) Magnéli-Phase Ti4O7 Nanosphere Electrocatalyst Support for Carbon-Free Oxygen Electrodes in Lithium-Oxygen Batteries. ACS Catal 8:2601–2610. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b0374110.1021/acscatal.7b03741 ↗
23. Wei W, Yuan T, Ye J (2023) Recent progress in electrochemical application of Magnéli phase Ti4O7-based materials: a review. J Mater Sci 58:14911–14944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08929-y10.1007/s10853-023-08929-y ↗
24. Zhang W, Gui S, Li W et al (2022) Functionally gradient silicon/graphite composite electrodes enabling stable cycling and high capacity for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14:51954–51964. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c1535510.1021/acsami.2c15355 ↗
25. Kim M, Choi J, Lee W et al (2023) Performance of Magnéli phase Ti4O7 and Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 as oxygen vacancy-rich titanium oxide anodes: comparison in terms of treatment efficiency, anodic degradative pathways, and long-term stability. Appl Catal B 337:122993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12299310.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122993 ↗
26. Wang G, Liu Y, He W, Ye J (2023) Conduction and sintering mechanism of high electrical conductivity Magnéli phase Ti4O7. Ceram Int 49:27117–27125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.05.25610.1016/j.ceramint.2023.05.256 ↗
27. Aghil S, Lam LYF, Chen G, Hu X (2023) Magneli Ti4O7 nanotube arrays as a free-standing efficient interlayer for fast-delivery and high-energy density lithium-sulfur batteries. J Alloys Comp 960:170874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17087410.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170874 ↗
28. Cao X, Wei C, Zheng X et al (2022) Ru clusters anchored on Magnéli phase Ti4O7 nanofibers enables flexible and highly efficient Li–O2 batteries. Energy Storage Mater 50:355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.05.02810.1016/j.ensm.2022.05.028 ↗
29. Ju X, Hou X, Liu Z et al (2023) Revealing the effect of high Ni content in Li-rich cathode materials: mitigating voltage decay or increasing intrinsic reactivity. Small 19:2207328. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20220732810.1002/smll.202207328 ↗
30. Yamada H, Yoshii K, Asahi M et al (2022) Cyclic voltammetry part 1: fundamentals. Electrochemistry 90:102005–102005. https://doi.org/10.5796/electrochemistry.22-6608210.5796/electrochemistry.22-66082 ↗
31. Zhang B, Zhu H, Ren Y et al (2023) An Innovative insight into performance degradation of NCM111 cathode induced by suspension of operation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:6612–6620. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c1741910.1021/acsami.2c17419 ↗
32. Tanaka Y, Kawase T, Matsuda K et al (2024) Electrode potential effect on the structures, properties, and formation process of SEI Film in lithium-ion batteries: red moon analysis. J Phys Chem C 128:13529–13538. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c0009910.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00099 ↗
33. Jha V, Krishnamurthy B (2022) Modeling the SEI layer formation and its growth in lithium-ion batteries (LiB) during charge–discharge cycling. Ionics 28:3661–3670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-022-04617-010.1007/s11581-022-04617-0 ↗
34. Källquist I, Lindgren F, Lee M-T et al (2021) Probing electrochemical potential differences over the solid/liquid interface in Li-ion battery model systems. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:32989–32996. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c0742410.1021/acsami.1c07424 ↗