Simulation of steel/epoxy laminates for electric engines or generators: part 2—experimentally and numerically established temperature-dependent cohesive zone model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Two waterborne varnishes with an epoxy equivalent weight (EEW) of ~ 500 and ~ 900 g/mol were used for preparation of full-surface-bonded electrical steel laminates. By digital image correlation (DIC)-assisted testing, a nonlinear temperature dependency of the thermal expansion coefficient was ascertained for the laminates. Using double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens and DIC-assisted crack opening measurement, temperature-dependent critical energy release rate (GIc) and J-integral (JIc) values were determined. The laminates with the higher EEW epoxy revealed higher GIc values. Up to 60 °C, high monotonic crack growth resistance was confirmed for both laminates. The GIc and JIc values were a factor of 10 lower above Tg of the epoxy. The data were used to implement and validate a temperature-dependent cohesive zone model (CZM) based on a bilinear traction–separation law. Such models are essential for the simulation of full-surface-bonded electric engine laminates. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. IEA Global EV Outlook (2024) Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024
2. Lamprecht E (2014) Der Einfluss der Fertigungsverfahren auf die Wirbelstromverluste von Stator-Einzelzahnblechpaketen für den Einsatz von Hybrid- und Elektrofahrzeugen: Bericht aus dem Lehrstuhl für Fertigungstechnologie Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Marion Merklein. Fertigungstechnik - Erlangen 247. Meisenbach, Bamberg
3. Hamzehbahmani H, Anderson P, Jenkins K, Lindenmo M (2016) Experimental study on inter-laminar short-circuit faults at random positions in laminated magnetic cores. IET Electr Power Appl 10(7):604–613. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2015.058510.1049/iet-epa.2015.0585 ↗
4. Lamprecht E, Homme M, Albrecht T (2012) Investigations of eddy current losses in laminated cores due to the impact of various stacking processes. In: 2012 2nd International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC). IEEE, pp 1–810.1109/EDPC.2012.6425097 ↗
5. Lamprecht E, Graf R (2011) Fundamental investigations of eddy current losses in laminated stator cores created through the impact of manufacturing processes. In: 2011 1st International Electric Drives Production Conference. IEEE, pp 29–3510.1109/EDPC.2011.6085544 ↗
6. Pugstaller R, Wallner GM, Strauß B, Fluch R (2019) Advanced characterization of laminated electrical steel structures under shear loading. J Adhes 95(9):834–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2018.145074710.1080/00218464.2018.1450747 ↗
7. Pugstaller R, Wallner GM, Strauß B, Fluch R (2022) Temperature dependent fatigue crack growth in electrical steel laminates with μm-thick epoxy layers. Eng Fract Mech 267:108416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10841610.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108416 ↗
8. Riedl G, Pugstaller R, Wallner GM (2022) Development and implementation of a simultaneous fatigue crack growth test setup for polymeric hybrid laminates. Eng Fract Mech 267:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10846810.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108468 ↗
9. Pugstaller R, Wallner GM (2021) Development of a fracture-mechanics based fatigue testing method for epoxy/electrical steel laminates with thin adhesive layer. Eng Fracture Mech 258:108045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10804510.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108045 ↗
10. Codina MN, Wallner GM, Pugstaller R, Riedl G, Strauß B, Rosner M (2024) Improvement of the environmental fatigue resistance of epoxy-based electrical steel laminates by pre-treatment of the substrate. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 134:10378810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103788 ↗
11. Marchfelder C, Pugstaller R, Wallner GM (2024) Effect of adhesion promoters on rheokinetics and roll peel strength of electrical steel stacks. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 134:10378910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103789 ↗
12. Marchfelder C, Pugstaller R, Wallner GM, Brüggemann O, Aufray M (2022) Effect of epoxy structure on properties of waterborne coatings and electrical steel laminates. Polymers 14(8):1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1408155610.3390/polym14081556 ↗
13. Tiefenthaler M, Marchfelder C, Lovas A, Wallner GM, Strauß B, Rosner M Characterization and modelling of coating films based on waterborne epoxy varnish systems. Submitted. Polymer Testing:1–8
14. Säckl G, Riedl G, Duchoslav J, Marchfelder C, Aufray M, Stifter D, Wallner GM (2025) Metal laminates based on waterborne epoxy varnishes - chemical interactions and effect on fatigue crack growth kinetics. Prog Org Coat 200:109104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2025.10910410.1016/j.porgcoat.2025.109104 ↗
15. Marchfelder C, Wallner GM, Reischauer M, Leidlmair D, Strauß B (2025) Effect of corrosion inhibitor modified silane pretreatment on the performance of electrical steel sheets and laminates. Int J Adhes Adhes 140:104010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.10401010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.104010 ↗
16. de Strycker M, Schueremans L, van Paepegem W, Debruyne D (2010) Measuring the thermal expansion coefficient of tubular steel specimens with digital image correlation techniques. Opt Lasers Eng 48(10):978–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.05.00810.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.05.008 ↗
17. Gupta VB, Drzal LT, Lee CC, Rich MJ (1985) The temperature-dependence of some mechanical properties of a cured epoxy resin system. Polym Eng Sci 25(13):812–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76025130510.1002/pen.760251305 ↗
18. Sadeghinia M, Jansen K, Ernst LJ (2012) Characterization and modeling the thermo-mechanical cure-dependent properties of epoxy molding compound. Int J Adhes Adhes 32:82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.10.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.10.007 ↗
19. Bing P, Hui-min X, Tao H, Asundi A (2009) Measurement of coefficient of thermal expansion of films using digital image correlation method. Polym Testing 28(1):75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.11.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.11.004 ↗
20. Sun F, Blackman B (2020) A DIC method to determine the Mode I energy release rate G, the J-integral and the traction-separation law simultaneously for adhesive joints. Eng Fract Mech 234:107097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10709710.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107097 ↗
21. Dias GF, de Moura M, Chousal J, Xavier J (2013) Cohesive laws of composite bonded joints under mode I loading. Compos Struct 106:646–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.027 ↗
22. Rajan S, Sutton MA, Fuerte R, Kidane A (2018) Traction-separation relationship for polymer-modified bitumen under Mode I loading: Double cantilever beam experiment with stereo digital image correlation. Eng Fract Mech 187:404–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.12.03110.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.12.031 ↗
23. Tiefenthaler M, Stelzer PS, Chung CN, Reisecker V, Major Z (2018) Characterization of the fracture mechanical behavior of C-SMC materials. APP 18:1–5. https://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2018.18.000110.14311/APP.2018.18.0001 ↗
24. Blaysat B, Hoefnagels J, Lubineau G, Alfano M, Geers M (2015) Interface debonding characterization by image correlation integrated with Double Cantilever Beam kinematics. Int J Solids Struct 55:79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.06.01210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.06.012 ↗
25. Gorman JM, Thouless MD (2019) The use of digital-image correlation to investigate the cohesive zone in a double-cantilever beam, with comparisons to numerical and analytical models. J Mech Phys Solids 123:315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.01310.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.013 ↗
26. Jackson CM, McGuire JA, Losada ME, Maskery I, Ashcroft I, de Vita R, Dillard DA (2024) Using cohesive zone models with digital image correlation to obtain a mixed mode I/II fracture envelope of a tough epoxy. Eng Fract Mech 295:109732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10973210.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109732 ↗
27. Richter J, Kuhtz M, Hornig A, Harhash M, Palkowski H, Gude M (2021) A mixed numerical-experimental method to characterize metal-polymer interfaces for crash applications. Metals 11(5):818. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1105081810.3390/met11050818 ↗
28. Sun F, Blackman BR (2021) Using digital image correlation to automate the measurement of crack length and fracture energy in the mode I testing of structural adhesive joints. Eng Fract Mech 255:107957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10795710.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107957 ↗
29. Günther N, Griese M, Stammen E, Dilger K (2019) Modeling of adhesive layers with temperature-dependent cohesive zone elements for predicting adhesive failure during the drying process of cathodic dip painting. Proceed Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Design Appl 233(3):485–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/146442071880600510.1177/1464420718806005 ↗
30. Baloglu MV, Ziegler M, Franke J, Willner K (2020) Determination of equivalent transversely isotropic material parameters for sheet-layered lamination stacks. Mech Syst Signal Process 145:106915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10691510.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106915 ↗
31. He L, Yuan Z, Shi W, Qu X (2022) Damage evolution of vehicle motor rotor under single working condition based on GTN model. J Theor Appl Mech 60(4):561–57710.15632/jtam-pl/152742 ↗
32. Martyushev NV, Malozyomov BV, Sorokova SN, Efremenkov EA, Qi M (2023) Mathematical modeling the performance of an electric vehicle considering various driving cycles. Mathematics 11(11):2586. https://doi.org/10.3390/math1111258610.3390/math11112586 ↗
33. Liu X, Fu Z, Qiu S, Li S, Zhang T, Liu X, Jiang Y (2023) Building-centric investigation into electric vehicle behavior: a survey-based simulation method for charging system design. Energy 271:127010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.12701010.1016/j.energy.2023.127010 ↗
34. Shin J, Kim W, Yoo K, Kim H, Han M (2023) Vehicular level battery modeling and its application to battery electric vehicle simulation. J Power Sources 556:232531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23253110.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232531 ↗
35. Selema A, Beretta M, van Coppenolle M, Tiismus H, Kallaste A, Ibrahim MN, Rombouts M, Vleugels J, Kestens LA, Sergeant P (2023) Evaluation of 3D-printed magnetic materials for additively-manufactured electrical machines. J Magn Magn Mater 569:170426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.17042610.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170426 ↗
36. Nguyen MD, Hoang DT, Kim SM, Jung WS, Shin KH, Kim YJ, Choi JY (2024) Nonlinear modeling and analysis considering coupling stator flux of wound-rotor synchronous motors. In: 2024 International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM). IEEE, pp 1–710.1109/ICEM60801.2024.10700445 ↗
37. Sanchez Porras AF, Alban D, Zigan L (2023) Lumped parameter thermal network model investigations for an electric machine stator with flux barriers. In: 2023 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference (IEMDC). IEEE, pp 1–610.1109/IEMDC55163.2023.10238979 ↗
38. Ziegler M, Schäfer P, Wieprecht N, Franke J, Kühl A (2023) Investigation of insulation layers on additive manufactured electrical steel laminations in electric motors. IEEE Trans Dielect Electr Insul 30(5):2344–2352. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2023.326182110.1109/TDEI.2023.3261821 ↗
39. Jerabek M, Major Z, Lang RW (2010) Strain determination of polymeric materials using digital image correlation. Polym Testing 29(3):407–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.01.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.01.005 ↗
40. Dengg A, Kralovec C, Schagerl M (2024) Damage monitoring of pinned hybrid composite–titanium joints using direct current electrical resistance measurement. Compos Struct 334:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11797210.1016/j.compstruct.2024.117972 ↗
41. Heinzlmeier L, Sieberer S, Kralovec C, Schagerl M (2023) Fatigue and progressive damage of thin woven CFRP plates weakened by circular holes. Exp Mech 63(5):871–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-023-00956-910.1007/s11340-023-00956-9 ↗
42. Heinzlmeier L, Sieberer S, Wolfsgruber T, Kralovec C, Schagerl M (2023) Damage propagation and residual strength of simple block-loaded CFRP plates with circular holes under tension-tension fatigue conditions. J Compos Sci 7(9):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs709037910.3390/jcs7090379 ↗
43. Kahlen S, Jerabek M, Wallner GM, Lang RW (2010) Characterization of physical and chemical aging of polymeric solar materials by mechanical testing. Polym Testing 29(1):72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.09.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.09.007 ↗
44. ASTM International (2004), files indexed by mero 2006 D 5528–01
45. Sieberer S, Nonn S, Schagerl M (2020) Experimental study on the stiffness evolution and residual strength of a pre-damaged structural component made from SMC CFRP material. In: Wahab MA (ed) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 827–83610.1007/978-981-13-8331-1_65 ↗
46. Sieberer S, Nonn S, Schagerl M (2020) Fatigue behaviour of discontinuous carbon-fibre reinforced specimens and structural parts. Int J Fatigue 131:105289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10528910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105289 ↗
47. Rogani A, Navarro P, Marguet S, Ferrero J-F (2021) Study of post-impact behaviour of thin carbon/epoxy laminates subject to fatigue tensile loading. Int J Fatigue 148:106134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10613410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106134 ↗
48. Hodgkinson J (2000) Mechanical Testing of Advanced Fibre Composites. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1533/9781855738911 ↗
49. Campilho R, Banea MD, Neto J, Da Silva L (2013) Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. Int J Adhes Adhes 44:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
50. Turon A, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, Costa J (2007) An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Eng Fract Mech 74(10):1665–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
51. Camanho PP, Davila CG, de Moura MF (2003) Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials. J Compos Mater 37(16):1415–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830303450510.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
52. Zou Z, Reid SR, Li S, Soden PD (2002) Modelling interlaminar and intralaminar damage in filament-wound pipes under quasi-static indentation. J Compos Mater 36(4):477–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830203600453910.1177/0021998302036004539 ↗
53. Kyongchan S, Carlos GD, Cheryl AR (2008) Guidelines and parameter selection for the simulation of progressive delamination. 2008 ABAQUS User''s Conference:1–15
54. Gao YF, Bower AF (2004) A simple technique for avoiding convergence problems in finite element simulations of crack nucleation and growth on cohesive interfaces. Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng 12(3):453–463. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/12/3/00710.1088/0965-0393/12/3/007 ↗
55. Chai H (1988) Shear fracture. Int J Fract 37(2):137–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0004171610.1007/BF00041716 ↗
56. Chai H (1992) Micromechanics of shear deformations in cracked bonded joints. Int J Fract 58(3):223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001561710.1007/BF00015617 ↗
57. Yang QD, Thouless MD, Ward SM (2001) Elastic–plastic mode-II fracture of adhesive joints. Int J Solids Struct 38(18):3251–3262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00221-310.1016/S0020-7683(00)00221-3 ↗
58. Kulawik J, Szeglowski Z, Czapla T, Kulawik JP (1989) Determination of glass transition temperature, thermal expansion and shrinkage of epoxy resins. Colloid Polym Sci 267:970–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0141015710.1007/BF01410157 ↗
59. Hidnert P, Dickson G (1944) Thermal expansion of high-silicon cast iron. J Res Natl Bur Stan 32(4):145. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.032.00610.6028/jres.032.006 ↗
60. Jones E, Reu PL (2018) Distortion of digital image correlation (DIC) displacements and strains from heat waves. Exp Mech 58(7):1133–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0354-310.1007/s11340-017-0354-3 ↗
61. Levita G, de Petris S, Marchetti A, Lazzeri A (1991) Crosslink density and fracture toughness of epoxy resins. J Mater Sci 26(9):2348–2352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0113018010.1007/BF01130180 ↗
62. Zhao J, Yu P, Dong S (2016) The influence of crosslink density on the failure behavior in amorphous polymers by molecular dynamics simulations. Materials 9(4):234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma904023410.3390/ma9040234 ↗
63. Lohse F, Schmid R, Batzer H, Fisch W (1969) Influence of chemical structure on the morphology and physical properties of crosslinked macromolecules synthesised by polyaddition reaction. Br Polym J 1(3):110–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.498001030210.1002/pi.4980010302 ↗
64. Banea MD, Da Silva L, Campilho R (2012) Effect of temperature on tensile strength and mode I fracture toughness of a high temperature epoxy adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol 26(7):939–953. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856111X59364910.1163/156856111X593649 ↗