journal article·2025-06Open access

Simulation of steel/epoxy laminates for electric engines or generators: part 2—experimentally and numerically established temperature-dependent cohesive zone model

Martin Tiefenthaler, Gernot M. Wallner, Cornelia Marchfelder, Bernhard Strauß, Martin Rosner

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 24

Abstract

Abstract Two waterborne varnishes with an epoxy equivalent weight (EEW) of ~ 500 and ~ 900 g/mol were used for preparation of full-surface-bonded electrical steel laminates. By digital image correlation (DIC)-assisted testing, a nonlinear temperature dependency of the thermal expansion coefficient was ascertained for the laminates. Using double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens and DIC-assisted crack opening measurement, temperature-dependent critical energy release rate (GIc) and J-integral (JIc) values were determined. The laminates with the higher EEW epoxy revealed higher GIc values. Up to 60 °C, high monotonic crack growth resistance was confirmed for both laminates. The GIc and JIc values were a factor of 10 lower above Tg of the epoxy. The data were used to implement and validate a temperature-dependent cohesive zone model (CZM) based on a bilinear traction–separation law. Such models are essential for the simulation of full-surface-bonded electric engine laminates. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. IEA Global EV Outlook (2024) Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024
2. Lamprecht E (2014) Der Einfluss der Fertigungsverfahren auf die Wirbelstromverluste von Stator-Einzelzahnblechpaketen für den Einsatz von Hybrid- und Elektrofahrzeugen: Bericht aus dem Lehrstuhl für Fertigungstechnologie Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Marion Merklein. Fertigungstechnik - Erlangen 247. Meisenbach, Bamberg
3. Hamzehbahmani H, Anderson P, Jenkins K, Lindenmo M (2016) Experimental study on inter-laminar short-circuit faults at random positions in laminated magnetic cores. IET Electr Power Appl 10(7):604–613. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2015.058510.1049/iet-epa.2015.0585 ↗
4. Lamprecht E, Homme M, Albrecht T (2012) Investigations of eddy current losses in laminated cores due to the impact of various stacking processes. In: 2012 2nd International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC). IEEE, pp 1–810.1109/EDPC.2012.6425097 ↗
5. Lamprecht E, Graf R (2011) Fundamental investigations of eddy current losses in laminated stator cores created through the impact of manufacturing processes. In: 2011 1st International Electric Drives Production Conference. IEEE, pp 29–3510.1109/EDPC.2011.6085544 ↗
6. Pugstaller R, Wallner GM, Strauß B, Fluch R (2019) Advanced characterization of laminated electrical steel structures under shear loading. J Adhes 95(9):834–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2018.145074710.1080/00218464.2018.1450747 ↗
7. Pugstaller R, Wallner GM, Strauß B, Fluch R (2022) Temperature dependent fatigue crack growth in electrical steel laminates with μm-thick epoxy layers. Eng Fract Mech 267:108416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10841610.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108416 ↗
8. Riedl G, Pugstaller R, Wallner GM (2022) Development and implementation of a simultaneous fatigue crack growth test setup for polymeric hybrid laminates. Eng Fract Mech 267:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10846810.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108468 ↗
9. Pugstaller R, Wallner GM (2021) Development of a fracture-mechanics based fatigue testing method for epoxy/electrical steel laminates with thin adhesive layer. Eng Fracture Mech 258:108045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10804510.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108045 ↗
10. Codina MN, Wallner GM, Pugstaller R, Riedl G, Strauß B, Rosner M (2024) Improvement of the environmental fatigue resistance of epoxy-based electrical steel laminates by pre-treatment of the substrate. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 134:10378810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103788 ↗
11. Marchfelder C, Pugstaller R, Wallner GM (2024) Effect of adhesion promoters on rheokinetics and roll peel strength of electrical steel stacks. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 134:10378910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103789 ↗
12. Marchfelder C, Pugstaller R, Wallner GM, Brüggemann O, Aufray M (2022) Effect of epoxy structure on properties of waterborne coatings and electrical steel laminates. Polymers 14(8):1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1408155610.3390/polym14081556 ↗
13. Tiefenthaler M, Marchfelder C, Lovas A, Wallner GM, Strauß B, Rosner M Characterization and modelling of coating films based on waterborne epoxy varnish systems. Submitted. Polymer Testing:1–8
14. Säckl G, Riedl G, Duchoslav J, Marchfelder C, Aufray M, Stifter D, Wallner GM (2025) Metal laminates based on waterborne epoxy varnishes - chemical interactions and effect on fatigue crack growth kinetics. Prog Org Coat 200:109104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2025.10910410.1016/j.porgcoat.2025.109104 ↗
15. Marchfelder C, Wallner GM, Reischauer M, Leidlmair D, Strauß B (2025) Effect of corrosion inhibitor modified silane pretreatment on the performance of electrical steel sheets and laminates. Int J Adhes Adhes 140:104010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.10401010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.104010 ↗
16. de Strycker M, Schueremans L, van Paepegem W, Debruyne D (2010) Measuring the thermal expansion coefficient of tubular steel specimens with digital image correlation techniques. Opt Lasers Eng 48(10):978–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.05.00810.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.05.008 ↗
17. Gupta VB, Drzal LT, Lee CC, Rich MJ (1985) The temperature-dependence of some mechanical properties of a cured epoxy resin system. Polym Eng Sci 25(13):812–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76025130510.1002/pen.760251305 ↗
18. Sadeghinia M, Jansen K, Ernst LJ (2012) Characterization and modeling the thermo-mechanical cure-dependent properties of epoxy molding compound. Int J Adhes Adhes 32:82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.10.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.10.007 ↗
19. Bing P, Hui-min X, Tao H, Asundi A (2009) Measurement of coefficient of thermal expansion of films using digital image correlation method. Polym Testing 28(1):75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.11.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.11.004 ↗
20. Sun F, Blackman B (2020) A DIC method to determine the Mode I energy release rate G, the J-integral and the traction-separation law simultaneously for adhesive joints. Eng Fract Mech 234:107097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10709710.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107097 ↗
21. Dias GF, de Moura M, Chousal J, Xavier J (2013) Cohesive laws of composite bonded joints under mode I loading. Compos Struct 106:646–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.027 ↗
22. Rajan S, Sutton MA, Fuerte R, Kidane A (2018) Traction-separation relationship for polymer-modified bitumen under Mode I loading: Double cantilever beam experiment with stereo digital image correlation. Eng Fract Mech 187:404–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.12.03110.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.12.031 ↗
23. Tiefenthaler M, Stelzer PS, Chung CN, Reisecker V, Major Z (2018) Characterization of the fracture mechanical behavior of C-SMC materials. APP 18:1–5. https://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2018.18.000110.14311/APP.2018.18.0001 ↗
24. Blaysat B, Hoefnagels J, Lubineau G, Alfano M, Geers M (2015) Interface debonding characterization by image correlation integrated with Double Cantilever Beam kinematics. Int J Solids Struct 55:79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.06.01210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.06.012 ↗
25. Gorman JM, Thouless MD (2019) The use of digital-image correlation to investigate the cohesive zone in a double-cantilever beam, with comparisons to numerical and analytical models. J Mech Phys Solids 123:315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.01310.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.013 ↗
26. Jackson CM, McGuire JA, Losada ME, Maskery I, Ashcroft I, de Vita R, Dillard DA (2024) Using cohesive zone models with digital image correlation to obtain a mixed mode I/II fracture envelope of a tough epoxy. Eng Fract Mech 295:109732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10973210.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109732 ↗
27. Richter J, Kuhtz M, Hornig A, Harhash M, Palkowski H, Gude M (2021) A mixed numerical-experimental method to characterize metal-polymer interfaces for crash applications. Metals 11(5):818. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1105081810.3390/met11050818 ↗
28. Sun F, Blackman BR (2021) Using digital image correlation to automate the measurement of crack length and fracture energy in the mode I testing of structural adhesive joints. Eng Fract Mech 255:107957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10795710.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107957 ↗
29. Günther N, Griese M, Stammen E, Dilger K (2019) Modeling of adhesive layers with temperature-dependent cohesive zone elements for predicting adhesive failure during the drying process of cathodic dip painting. Proceed Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Design Appl 233(3):485–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/146442071880600510.1177/1464420718806005 ↗
30. Baloglu MV, Ziegler M, Franke J, Willner K (2020) Determination of equivalent transversely isotropic material parameters for sheet-layered lamination stacks. Mech Syst Signal Process 145:106915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10691510.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106915 ↗
31. He L, Yuan Z, Shi W, Qu X (2022) Damage evolution of vehicle motor rotor under single working condition based on GTN model. J Theor Appl Mech 60(4):561–57710.15632/jtam-pl/152742 ↗
32. Martyushev NV, Malozyomov BV, Sorokova SN, Efremenkov EA, Qi M (2023) Mathematical modeling the performance of an electric vehicle considering various driving cycles. Mathematics 11(11):2586. https://doi.org/10.3390/math1111258610.3390/math11112586 ↗
33. Liu X, Fu Z, Qiu S, Li S, Zhang T, Liu X, Jiang Y (2023) Building-centric investigation into electric vehicle behavior: a survey-based simulation method for charging system design. Energy 271:127010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.12701010.1016/j.energy.2023.127010 ↗
34. Shin J, Kim W, Yoo K, Kim H, Han M (2023) Vehicular level battery modeling and its application to battery electric vehicle simulation. J Power Sources 556:232531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23253110.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232531 ↗
35. Selema A, Beretta M, van Coppenolle M, Tiismus H, Kallaste A, Ibrahim MN, Rombouts M, Vleugels J, Kestens LA, Sergeant P (2023) Evaluation of 3D-printed magnetic materials for additively-manufactured electrical machines. J Magn Magn Mater 569:170426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.17042610.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170426 ↗
36. Nguyen MD, Hoang DT, Kim SM, Jung WS, Shin KH, Kim YJ, Choi JY (2024) Nonlinear modeling and analysis considering coupling stator flux of wound-rotor synchronous motors. In: 2024 International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM). IEEE, pp 1–710.1109/ICEM60801.2024.10700445 ↗
37. Sanchez Porras AF, Alban D, Zigan L (2023) Lumped parameter thermal network model investigations for an electric machine stator with flux barriers. In: 2023 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference (IEMDC). IEEE, pp 1–610.1109/IEMDC55163.2023.10238979 ↗
38. Ziegler M, Schäfer P, Wieprecht N, Franke J, Kühl A (2023) Investigation of insulation layers on additive manufactured electrical steel laminations in electric motors. IEEE Trans Dielect Electr Insul 30(5):2344–2352. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2023.326182110.1109/TDEI.2023.3261821 ↗
39. Jerabek M, Major Z, Lang RW (2010) Strain determination of polymeric materials using digital image correlation. Polym Testing 29(3):407–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.01.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.01.005 ↗
40. Dengg A, Kralovec C, Schagerl M (2024) Damage monitoring of pinned hybrid composite–titanium joints using direct current electrical resistance measurement. Compos Struct 334:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11797210.1016/j.compstruct.2024.117972 ↗
41. Heinzlmeier L, Sieberer S, Kralovec C, Schagerl M (2023) Fatigue and progressive damage of thin woven CFRP plates weakened by circular holes. Exp Mech 63(5):871–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-023-00956-910.1007/s11340-023-00956-9 ↗
42. Heinzlmeier L, Sieberer S, Wolfsgruber T, Kralovec C, Schagerl M (2023) Damage propagation and residual strength of simple block-loaded CFRP plates with circular holes under tension-tension fatigue conditions. J Compos Sci 7(9):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs709037910.3390/jcs7090379 ↗
43. Kahlen S, Jerabek M, Wallner GM, Lang RW (2010) Characterization of physical and chemical aging of polymeric solar materials by mechanical testing. Polym Testing 29(1):72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.09.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.09.007 ↗
44. ASTM International (2004), files indexed by mero 2006 D 5528–01
45. Sieberer S, Nonn S, Schagerl M (2020) Experimental study on the stiffness evolution and residual strength of a pre-damaged structural component made from SMC CFRP material. In: Wahab MA (ed) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 827–83610.1007/978-981-13-8331-1_65 ↗
46. Sieberer S, Nonn S, Schagerl M (2020) Fatigue behaviour of discontinuous carbon-fibre reinforced specimens and structural parts. Int J Fatigue 131:105289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10528910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105289 ↗
47. Rogani A, Navarro P, Marguet S, Ferrero J-F (2021) Study of post-impact behaviour of thin carbon/epoxy laminates subject to fatigue tensile loading. Int J Fatigue 148:106134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10613410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106134 ↗
48. Hodgkinson J (2000) Mechanical Testing of Advanced Fibre Composites. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1533/9781855738911 ↗
49. Campilho R, Banea MD, Neto J, Da Silva L (2013) Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. Int J Adhes Adhes 44:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
50. Turon A, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, Costa J (2007) An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Eng Fract Mech 74(10):1665–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
51. Camanho PP, Davila CG, de Moura MF (2003) Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials. J Compos Mater 37(16):1415–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830303450510.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
52. Zou Z, Reid SR, Li S, Soden PD (2002) Modelling interlaminar and intralaminar damage in filament-wound pipes under quasi-static indentation. J Compos Mater 36(4):477–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830203600453910.1177/0021998302036004539 ↗
53. Kyongchan S, Carlos GD, Cheryl AR (2008) Guidelines and parameter selection for the simulation of progressive delamination. 2008 ABAQUS User''s Conference:1–15
54. Gao YF, Bower AF (2004) A simple technique for avoiding convergence problems in finite element simulations of crack nucleation and growth on cohesive interfaces. Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng 12(3):453–463. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/12/3/00710.1088/0965-0393/12/3/007 ↗
55. Chai H (1988) Shear fracture. Int J Fract 37(2):137–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0004171610.1007/BF00041716 ↗
56. Chai H (1992) Micromechanics of shear deformations in cracked bonded joints. Int J Fract 58(3):223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001561710.1007/BF00015617 ↗
57. Yang QD, Thouless MD, Ward SM (2001) Elastic–plastic mode-II fracture of adhesive joints. Int J Solids Struct 38(18):3251–3262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00221-310.1016/S0020-7683(00)00221-3 ↗
58. Kulawik J, Szeglowski Z, Czapla T, Kulawik JP (1989) Determination of glass transition temperature, thermal expansion and shrinkage of epoxy resins. Colloid Polym Sci 267:970–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0141015710.1007/BF01410157 ↗
59. Hidnert P, Dickson G (1944) Thermal expansion of high-silicon cast iron. J Res Natl Bur Stan 32(4):145. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.032.00610.6028/jres.032.006 ↗
60. Jones E, Reu PL (2018) Distortion of digital image correlation (DIC) displacements and strains from heat waves. Exp Mech 58(7):1133–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0354-310.1007/s11340-017-0354-3 ↗
61. Levita G, de Petris S, Marchetti A, Lazzeri A (1991) Crosslink density and fracture toughness of epoxy resins. J Mater Sci 26(9):2348–2352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0113018010.1007/BF01130180 ↗
62. Zhao J, Yu P, Dong S (2016) The influence of crosslink density on the failure behavior in amorphous polymers by molecular dynamics simulations. Materials 9(4):234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma904023410.3390/ma9040234 ↗
63. Lohse F, Schmid R, Batzer H, Fisch W (1969) Influence of chemical structure on the morphology and physical properties of crosslinked macromolecules synthesised by polyaddition reaction. Br Polym J 1(3):110–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.498001030210.1002/pi.4980010302 ↗
64. Banea MD, Da Silva L, Campilho R (2012) Effect of temperature on tensile strength and mode I fracture toughness of a high temperature epoxy adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol 26(7):939–953. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856111X59364910.1163/156856111X593649 ↗