Establishment and validation of an organic coating aging evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process principle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Xu CC, Liu W (2020) Organic–inorganic hybrid corrosion protection coating materials for offshore wind power devices: a mini-review and perspective. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 710(1):74–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2020.183035110.1080/15421406.2020.1830351 ↗
2. Olajire AA (2018) Recent advances on organic coating system technologies for corrosion protection of offshore metallic structures. J Mol Liq 269:572–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.08.05310.1016/j.molliq.2018.08.053 ↗
3. Zhang CL, He Y, Xu ZH, Shi H, Di HH, Pan Y, Xu W (2016) Fabrication of Fe3O4@SiO2 nanocomposites to enhance anticorrosion performance of epoxy coatings. Polym Advan Technol 27(6):740–747. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.370710.1002/pat.3707 ↗
4. Jafarzadeh S, Claesson PM, Pan J, Thormann E (2014) Direct measurement of colloidal interactions between polyaniline surfaces in a UV-curable coating formulation: the effect of surface hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity and resin composition. Langmuir 30(4):1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1021/la403506210.1021/la4035062 ↗
5. Liu M, Mao XH, Zhu H, Lin A, Wang DH (2013) Water and corrosion resistance of epoxy-acrylic-amine waterborne coatings: Effects of resin molecular weight, polar group and hydrophobic segment. Corros Sci 75:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.05.02010.1016/j.corsci.2013.05.020 ↗
6. Ochs H, Vogelsang J, Meyer G (2003) Enhanced surface roughness of organic coatings due to UV-degradation: an unknown source of EIS-artifacts. Prog Org Coat 46:182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9440(03)00004-310.1016/s0300-9440(03)00004-3 ↗
7. Rabek JF (1987) Mechanisms of photophysical progresses and photo-chemical reactions in polymers. Springer, New York
8. Mckellar JF, Allen NS (1979) Photochemistry of Man Made Polymers. Springer, New York
9. Oosterbroek M, Larmmers RJ, Van der Ven LGJ, Perera DY (1991) Crack formation and stress development in an organic coating. J Coat Techol 63(799):55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4332(91)90091-W10.1016/0169-4332(91)90091-W ↗
10. Croll S, Hinderliter B (2008) A framework for predicting the service lifetime of composite polymeric coatings. J Mater Sci 43:6630–6641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2645-710.1007/s10853-008-2645-7 ↗
11. Mills D, Jamali S, Tobiszewski MT (2012) Developing electrochemical measurements in order to assess anti-corrosive coatings more effectively. Prog Org Coat 74(2):385–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.11.00210.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.11.002 ↗
12. Vencl A, Arostegui S, Favaro G, Zivic F, Mrdak M, Mitrovic S, Popovic V (2011) Evaluation of adhesion/cohesion bond strength of the thick plasma spray coatings by scratch testing on coatings cross-sections. Tribol Int 44(11):1281–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2011.04.00210.1016/j.triboint.2011.04.002 ↗
13. Dong CF, Sheng H, An YH, Li XG, Xiao K, Cheng YF (2010) Corrosion of 7A04 aluminum alloy under defected epoxy coating studied by localized electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Prog Org Coat 67(3):269–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.11.00410.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.11.004 ↗
14. Szocinski M, Darowicki K (2020) Performance of organic coatings upon cyclic mechanical load. Prog Org Coat 146:105718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10571810.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105718 ↗
15. Darowicki K, Slepski P, Szocinski M (2005) Application of the dynamic EIS to investigation of transport within organic coatings. Prog Org Coat 52(4):306–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.06.00710.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.06.007 ↗
16. Narozny M, Zakowski K, Darowicki K (2018) Application of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy to evaluate cathodically protected coated steel in seawater. Constr Build Mater 181:721–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.03310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.033 ↗
17. Eckhard K, Schuhmann W (2008) Alternating current techniques in scanning electrochemical microscopy (AC-SECM). Analyst 133(11):1486–1497. https://doi.org/10.1039/b806721j10.1039/b806721j ↗
18. Marques AG, Simoes AM (2014) EIS and SVET assessment of corrosion resistance of thin Zn-55% Al-rich primers: effect of immersion and of controlled deformation. Electrochim Acta 148:153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.10.01510.1016/j.electacta.2014.10.015 ↗
19. Upadhyay V, Battocchi D (2016) Localized electrochemical characterization of organic coatings: a brief review. Prog Org Coat 99:365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.06.01210.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.06.012 ↗
20. da Silva TC, Mallarino S, Touzain S, Margarit-Mattos ICP (2019) DMA, EIS and thermal fatigue of organic coatings. Electrochim Acta 318:989–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.06610.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.066 ↗
21. Saaty RW (1987) The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Math Model 9(3–5):161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-810.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8 ↗
22. Yong XY, Hu XY, Jiang L, Ma QF, Chen RH (2018) Damage assessment of the corrosion-resistant performances for organic coating systems after accelerated tests using analytic hierarchy process. Eng Fail Anal 93:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.01510.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.015 ↗
23. ISO 4628–4:2003 Paints and varnishes—Evaluation of degradation of coatings; designation of quantity and size of defects, and of intensity of uniform changes in appearance—Part 4: Assessment of degree of cracking.
24. Chan HK, Sun XT, Chung SH (2019) when should fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process? Decis Support Syst 125:113114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.11311410.1016/j.dss.2019.113114 ↗
25. Zhang ZH, Wu J, Zhao X, Zhang YS, Wu YM, Su T, Deng HC (2020) Life evaluation of organic coatings on hydraulic metal structures. Prog Org Coat 148:105848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10584810.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105848 ↗
26. Soljic I, Soic I, Kostelac L, Martinez S (2022) AC interference impact on EIS assessment of organic coatings using dummy cells, calibration foils and field exposed coated samples. Prog Org Coat 165:106767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.10676710.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.106767 ↗
27. Rondinella A, Offoiach R, Andreatta F, Capurso G, Calabrese L, Proverbio E, Fedrizzi L (2023) Development of a warning system for defects onset in organic coatings on large surfaces. Prog Org Coat 179:107528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.10752810.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.107528 ↗
28. Bakalli M, Keil P, Strunz W, Broeker T, Herrmann R, Vogelsang J (2023) Critical view of the results of the 2nd international round-robin test on EIS measurements of organic coatings. Prog Org Coat 180:107565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.10756510.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.107565 ↗