The effect of heat treatment on the interface of 15–5 PH martensitic stainless steel and SAF 2507 duplex steel in functionally graded AM components
Source abstract
Abstract
Multi-material components, also known as functionally graded materials (FGMs), are innovative materials that possess unique properties due to their composition and have many potential applications in engineering and science. The effect of the heat treatment (HT) of functionally graded materials 15–5 precipitation-hardened (PH) martensitic steel and SAF 2507 duplex stainless steel (and the opposite order of deposition, i.e. SAF 2507 first followed by 15–5 PH stainless steel) on the interface microstructures was systematically investigated in the presented research. The choice of HT followed the trend of optimum post-processing for the individual alloys. A significant modification in the interface microstructure, characterized in the microstructural transition zone (MTZ) formed above the fusion line. Mechanical properties by miniaturized testing method including hardness measurement characterized both types of interfaces. The sequence of the materials’ application did not have a significant effect on their final mechanical tensile properties in the heat-treated states. Nevertheless, the microstructural change at the MTZ led to drop in the hardness at the interface. The research presents heat-treated FGMs in a horizontal configuration to form a high-quality metallurgical joint between heterogeneous materials manufactured by powder-based directed energy deposition method.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Saleh B, Jiang J, Fathi R et al (2020) 30 Years of functionally graded materials: an overview of manufacturing methods, applications and future challenges. Compos Part B Eng 201:108376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10837610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108376 ↗
2. Melzer D, Džugan J, Koukolíková M et al (2021) Structural integrity and mechanical properties of the functionally graded material based on 316L/IN718 processed by DED technology. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14103810.1016/j.msea.2021.141038 ↗
3. Melzer D, Džugan J, Koukolíková M et al (2022) Fracture characterisation of vertically build functionally graded 316L stainless steel with inconel 718 deposited by directed energy deposition process. Virtual Phys Prototyp 17:821–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2022.207379310.1080/17452759.2022.2073793 ↗
4. Xiao Y, Wan Z, Liu P et al (2022) Quantitative simulations of grain nucleation and growth at additively manufactured bimetallic interfaces of SS316L and IN625. J Mater Process Technol 302:117506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11750610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117506 ↗
5. Chen N, Khan HA, Wan Z et al (2020) Microstructural characteristics and crack formation in additively manufactured bimetal material of 316L stainless steel and Inconel 625. Addit Manuf 32:101037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10103710.1016/j.addma.2020.101037 ↗
6. Mészáros I, Bögre B (2019) Complex study of eutectoidal phase transformation of 2507-type super-duplex stainless steel. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1213220510.3390/ma12132205 ↗
7. Sam M, Jojith R, Radhika N (2021) Progression in manufacturing of functionally graded materials and impact of thermal treatment—A critical review. J Manuf Process 68:1339–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.06.06210.1016/j.jmapro.2021.06.062 ↗
8. Chen W, Xu L, Zhang Y et al (2022) Additive manufacturing of high-performance 15–5PH stainless steel matrix composites. Virtual Phys Prototyp 17:366–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2021.201979310.1080/17452759.2021.2019793 ↗
9. Chen W, Xu L, Hao K et al (2023) Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and performances of additively manufactured 15–5PH stainless steel. Opt Laser Technol 157:108711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10871110.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108711 ↗
10. Kultz Unti LF, Aota LS, Jardini AL et al (2021) Microstructural characterization of 15–5PH stainless steel processed by laser powder-bed fusion. Mater Charact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2021.11148510.1016/j.matchar.2021.111485 ↗
11. Brázda M, Salvetr P, Rzepa S et al (2021) Effect of heat treatment on mechanical properties of duplex steel SAF 2507 manufactured by DED. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1178:012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1178/1/01200810.1088/1757-899x/1178/1/012008 ↗
12. Salvetr P, Školáková A, Melzer D et al (2022) Characterization of super duplex stainless steel SAF2507 deposited by directed energy deposition. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14408410.1016/j.msea.2022.144084 ↗
13. Haghdadi N, Laleh M, Moyle M, Primig S (2021) Additive manufacturing of steels: a review of achievements and challenges. J Mater Sci 56:64–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05109-010.1007/s10853-020-05109-0 ↗
14. Kumar VA, Karthikeyan MK, Gupta RK et al (2012) Aging behavior in 15–5 ph precipitation hardening martensitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Forum 710:483–488. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.710.48310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.710.483 ↗
15. Biezma MV, Martin U, Linhardt P et al (2021) Non-destructive techniques for the detection of sigma phase in duplex stainless steel: a comprehensive review. Eng Fail Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10522710.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105227 ↗
16. Taban E, Kaluc E (2011) Welding behaviour of duplex and superduplex stainless steels using laser and plasma arc welding processes. Weld World 55:48–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0332130710.1007/BF03321307 ↗
17. (2023) Osprey ® 2507 Super-duplex stainless steel for additive manufacturing datasheet. https://www.additive.sandvik/en/super-duplex/super-duplex-powder-for-additive-manufacturing/material-data-osprey-2507-super-duplex-stainless-steel/
18. Peng XY, Zhou XL, Hua XZ et al (2015) Effect of aging on hardening behavior of 15–5 PH stainless steel. J Iron Steel Res Int 22:607–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(15)30047-910.1016/S1006-706X(15)30047-9 ↗
19. Muthupandi V, Bala Srinivasan P, Seshadri SK, Sundaresan S (2003) Effect of weld metal chemistry and heat input on the structure and properties of duplex stainless steel welds. Mater Sci Eng A 358:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00077-710.1016/S0921-5093(03)00077-7 ↗
20. Köse C, Topal C (2022) Texture, microstructure and mechanical properties of laser beam welded AISI 2507 super duplex stainless steel. Mater Chem Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12649010.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126490 ↗
21. Zhang Z, Zhao H, Zhang H et al (2017) Microstructure evolution and pitting corrosion behavior of UNS S32750 super duplex stainless steel welds after short-time heat treatment. Corros Sci 121:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.02.00610.1016/j.corsci.2017.02.006 ↗
22. Wei C, Li L, Zhang X, Chueh YH (2018) 3D printing of multiple metallic materials via modified selective laser melting. CIRP Ann 67:245–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.09610.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.096 ↗
23. Koukolíková M, Simson T, Rzepa S et al (2022) The influence of laser power on the interfaces of functionally graded materials fabricated by powder-based directed energy deposition. J Mater Sci 57:13695–13723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07453-910.1007/s10853-022-07453-9 ↗
24. Godec M, Malej S, Feizpour D et al (2021) Hybrid additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 for future space applications. Mater Charact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11084210.1016/j.matchar.2020.110842 ↗
25. Rzepa S, Trojanová Z, Džugan J et al (2023) Effect of ECAP processing on microstructure and mechanical behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by directed energy deposition. Mater Charact 196:112622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11262210.1016/j.matchar.2022.112622 ↗
26. Andreiev A, Hoyer KP, Dula D et al (2021) Laser beam melting of functionally graded materials with application-adapted tailoring of magnetic and mechanical performance. Mater Sci Eng A 822:141662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14166210.1016/j.msea.2021.141662 ↗
27. Hu Z, Ma Z, Yu L, Liu Y (2023) Functionally graded materials with grain-size gradients and heterogeneous microstructures achieved by additive manufacturing. Scr Mater 226:115197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.11519710.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115197 ↗
28. Chen W, Luan JH, Xu L et al (2022) Reversed austenite in additively manufactured martensitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 834:142597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14259710.1016/j.msea.2022.142597 ↗
29. Kumar P, Sharma SK, Singh RKR (2022) Recent trends and future outlooks in manufacturing methods and applications of FGM: a comprehensive review. Mater Manuf Process. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.207589210.1080/10426914.2022.2075892 ↗
30. Zhang J, Yu M, Li Z et al (2021) The effect of laser energy density on the microstructure, residual stress and phase composition of H13 steel treated by laser surface melting. J Alloys Compd 856:158168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15816810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158168 ↗
31. Zhang B, Wang H, He B et al (2022) Microstructure and mechanical properties of directed energy deposited U75V/15–5PH structurally graded material. J Alloys Compd 898:163001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16300110.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163001 ↗
32. Hengsbach F, Koppa P, Holzweissig MJ et al (2018) Inline additively manufactured functionally graded multi-materials: microstructural and mechanical characterization of 316L parts with H13 layers. Prog Addit Manuf 3:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0044-410.1007/s40964-018-0044-4 ↗
33. Liang A, Sahu S, Zhao X et al (2023) Materials characterization interfacial characteristics of austenitic 316 L and martensitic 15–5PH stainless steels joined by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Charact 198:112719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2023.11271910.1016/j.matchar.2023.112719 ↗
34. Yang SW, Yoon J, Lee H, Shim DS (2022) Defect of functionally graded material of inconel 718 and STS 316L fabricated by directed energy deposition and its effect on mechanical properties. J Mater Res Technol 17:478–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.01.02910.1016/j.jmrt.2022.01.029 ↗
35. Zhang X, Chai Z, Chen H et al (2021) A novel method to prevent cracking in directed energy deposition of inconel 738 by in-situ doping inconel 718. Mater Des 197:109214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10921410.1016/j.matdes.2020.109214 ↗
36. Nowell MM, Wright SI, Carpenter JO (2009) Differentiating ferrite and martensite in steel microstructures using electron backscatter diffraction. Mater Sci Technol Conf Exhib 2009, MS T’09 2:933–943
37. Mandal M, Aashranth B, Samantaray D, Vasudevan M (2022) Improvements in the metallography of ferritic–martensitic steels through a color etching procedure. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 12:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-022-00916-010.1007/s13632-022-00916-0 ↗
38. Zhang X, Zhang Y, Wu Y et al (2019) Effects of melting-mixing ratio on the interfacial microstructure and tensile properties of austenitic – ferritic stainless steel joints. Integr Med Res 8:2649–2661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.12.02510.1016/j.jmrt.2018.12.025 ↗
39. Keehan E, Karlsson L, Andren HO (2006) Influence of carbon, manganese and nickel on microstructure and properties of strong steel weld metals: part 1 - Effect of nickel content. Sci Technol Weld Join 11:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1179/174329306X7783010.1179/174329306X77830 ↗
40. Vunnam S, Saboo A, Sudbrack C, Starr TL (2019) Effect of powder chemical composition on the as-built microstructure of 17–4 PH stainless steel processed by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 30:100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10087610.1016/j.addma.2019.100876 ↗
41. JC Lippold 2014 Welding Metallurgy and Weldability Wiley10.1002/9781118960332 ↗
42. Koukal J et al (2020). Materials and their behaviour during welding. Ostrava
43. Soysal T, Kou S, Tat D, Pasang T (2016) Acta Materialia Macrosegregation in dissimilar-metal fusion welding. Acta Mater 110:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.00410.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.004 ↗
44. Haghdadi N, Cizek P, Hodgson PD et al (2018) Effect of ferrite-to-austenite phase transformation path on the interface crystallographic character distributions in a duplex stainless steel. Acta Mater 145:196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.05710.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.057 ↗
45. Haghdadi N, Ledermueller C, Chen H et al (2022) Evolution of microstructure and mechanical properties in 2205 duplex stainless steels during additive manufacturing and heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 835:142695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14269510.1016/j.msea.2022.142695 ↗
46. Zhang L, Harrison W, Yar MA et al (2021) The development of miniature tensile specimens with non-standard aspect and slimness ratios for rapid alloy prototyping processes. J Mater Res Technol 15:1830–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.02910.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.029 ↗
47. ASTM E111–17 (1997) Standard test method for young’ s modulus, tangent modulus, and chord modulus. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0111-04.210.1520/E0111-04.2 ↗
48. Roberts D, Zhang Y, Charit I, Zhang J (2018) A comparative study of microstructure and high-temperature mechanical properties of 15–5 PH stainless steel processed via additive manufacturing and traditional manufacturing. Prog Addit Manuf 3:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0051-510.1007/s40964-018-0051-5 ↗
49. Jiang D, Gao X, Zhu Y et al (2022) In-situ duplex structure formation and high tensile strength of super duplex stainless steel produced by directed laser deposition. Mater Sci Eng A 833:142557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.202110.1016/j.msea.2021 ↗