journal article·2023-01

Modeling of the temperature effects on magnetorheological fluids over a wide temperature range based on free volume theory

Jingcheng Lv, Mingyu Wu, Tong Zhao, Yintao Wei

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

As a smart material with controllable rheological properties, magnetorheological fluids (MRFs) have been increasingly used in various fields. The temperature of MRFs inevitably changes during operation, which markedly affects the rheological properties; thus, the modeling of temperature effects is critical for the control and design of magnetorheological devices. However, most studies only examine the temperature effects of MRFs in a narrow temperature range, which fails to effectively cover the operating temperature range of MRFs, and the viscosity-temperature models used have notable limitations. This paper proposes to use free volume theory, in the form of the universal Doolittle equation, to study the viscosity-temperature behavior of MRFs and their base oils over a wide temperature range. Compared with the existing Reynolds and Arrhenius equations, the Doolittle equation achieves an accuracy improvement of up to 17 times and eight times, respectively. It predicts the overall viscosity-temperature behavior of liquids based on four data points taken over a narrow temperature range, with a relative root-mean-square error (RMSE) of no more than 5%. Ignoring the limited effect of off-state yield stress, the Doolittle equation with strong expandability can be used to establish temperature-dependent MRF constitutive equations. It can even develop multiphysics models based on the highly similar viscosity-temperature characteristics between MRFs and their base oils, which will greatly facilitate the development and optimization of MRFs.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Eshgarf H, Nadooshan AA, Raisi A (2022) An overview on properties and applications of magnetorheological fluids: Dampers, batteries, valves and brakes. J Energy Storage 50:104648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.10464810.1016/j.est.2022.104648 ↗
2. Gołdasz J, Sapiński B (2015) Insight into magnetorheological shock absorbers, 1st edn. Springer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-13233-4 ↗
3. Wereley NM (2014) Magnetorheology: advances and applications the royal society of chemistry, 1st edn. Thomas Graham House
4. Ghaffari A, Hashemabadi SH, Ashtiani M (2015) A review on the simulation and modeling of magnetorheological fluids. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 26:881–90410.1177/1045389X14546650 ↗
5. Liang GQ, Zhao T, Li NF, Wei YT, Sergio MS (2021) Magnetorheological damper temperature characteristics and control-oriented temperature-revised model. Smart Mater Struct 30:125005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac2de410.1088/1361-665X/ac2de4 ↗
6. Das S (2020) Modeling and simulation of mechatronic systems using Simscape. Morgan & Claypool10.1007/978-3-031-79653-1 ↗
7. Zschunke F, Rivas R, Brunn PO (2005) Temperature behavior of magnetorheological fluids. Appl Rheol 15:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2005-000710.1515/arh-2005-0007 ↗
8. Batterbee DC, Sims ND (2008) Temperature sensitive stability of feedback controllers for MR dampers. In: Proceedings of SPIE 6928, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, San Diego, CA, USA. SPIE, pp 69281B. doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.77541110.1117/12.775411 ↗
9. Hp LI, Jönkkäri I, Sarlin E, Chen F (2021) Temperature effects and temperature-dependent constitutive model of magnetorheological fluids. Rheol Acta 60:719–72810.1007/s00397-021-01302-3 ↗
10. Xiong H, Luo Y, Ji D, Ren H, Wei D, Liu W (2021) Analysis and evaluation of temperature field and experiment for magnetorheological fluid testing devices. Adv Mech Eng 13:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814021101253810.1177/16878140211012538 ↗
11. Wang N, Liu X, Królczyk G, Li Z, Li W (2019) Effect of temperature on the transmission characteristics of high-torque magnetorheological brakes. Smart Mater Struct 28:057002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab134c10.1088/1361-665X/ab134c ↗
12. Mckee M, Gordaninejad F, Wang X (2018) Effects of temperature on performance of compressible magnetorheological fluid suspension systems. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 29:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X1770520310.1177/1045389X17705203 ↗
13. Kariganaur AK, Kumar H, Arun M (2022) Influence of temperature on magnetorheological fluid properties and damping performance. Smart Mater Struct 31:055018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac634610.1088/1361-665X/ac6346 ↗
14. Sherman SG, Powell LA, Becnel AC, Wereley NM (2015) Scaling temperature dependent rheology of magnetorheological fluids. J Appl Phys 117:17C75110.1063/1.4918628 ↗
15. Hajalilou A, Mazlan SA, Lavvafi H, Shameli K (2016) Field Responsive Fluids as Smart Materials. Springer Singapore10.1007/978-981-10-2495-5 ↗
16. Li Y, Luo Y, Luo J et al (2022) Study on the influence of temperature-magnetic field coupling on the mechanical properties of magnetorheological fluids. Phys Status Solidi RRL 16:2100476. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.20210047610.1002/pssr.202100476 ↗
17. Bahiuddin I, Mazlan SA, Shapiai I, Imaduddin F, Ubaidillah CHOIS-B (2018) Constitutive models of magnetorheological fluids having temperature-dependent prediction parameter. Smart Mater Struct 27:09500110.1088/1361-665X/aac237 ↗
18. Chen S, Huang J, Jian K, Ding J (2015) Analysis of Influence of Temperature on Magnetorheological Fluid and Transmission Performance. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2015:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/58307610.1155/2015/583076 ↗
19. Elsaady W, Oyadiji SO, Nasser A (2020) A review on multiphysics numerical modelling in different applications of magnetorheological fluids. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 31:1855–1897. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X2093563210.1177/1045389X20935632 ↗
20. Bucchi F, Forte P, Frendo F (2015) Temperature effect on the torque characteristic of a magnetorheological clutch. Mech Adv Mater Struct 22:150–15810.1080/15376494.2014.910581 ↗
21. Zheng J, Li Y, Li Z, Wang J (2015) Transient multi-physics analysis of a magnetorheological shock absorber with the inverse Jiles-Atherton hysteresis model. Smart Mater Struct 24:105024. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/10502410.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105024 ↗
22. Knežević D, Savić V (2006) Mathematical modeling of changing of dynamic viscosity, as a function of temperature and pressure, of mineral oils for hydraulic systems. Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng 4:27–34
23. Haj-Kacem RB, Ouerfelli N, Herráez JV, Guettari M, Hamda H, Dallel M (2014) Contribution to modeling the viscosity Arrhenius-type equation for some solvents by statistical correlations analysis. Fluid Phase Equilib 383:11–2010.1016/j.fluid.2014.09.023 ↗
24. Peleg M (2018) Temperature–viscosity models reassessed. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 58:2663–2672. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.132583610.1080/10408398.2017.1325836 ↗
25. Baled HO, Gamwo IK, Enick RM, McHugh MA (2018) Viscosity models for pure hydrocarbons at extreme conditions: a review and comparative study. Fuel 218:89–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.00210.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.002 ↗
26. White RP, Lipson JEG (2016) Polymer free volume and its connection to the glass transition. Macromol 49:3987–4007. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0021510.1021/acs.macromol.6b00215 ↗
27. Turnbull D, Cohen MH (1970) On the free-volume model of the liquid-glass transition. J Chem Phys 52:3038–3041. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.167343410.1063/1.1673434 ↗
28. Hao T (2008) Viscosities of liquids, colloidal suspensions, and polymeric systems under zero or non-zero electric field. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 142:1–1910.1016/j.cis.2008.04.002 ↗
29. Meyer JP, Adio SA, Sharifpur M, Nwosu PN (2016) The viscosity of nanofluids: a review of the theoretical, empirical, and numerical models. Heat Transfer Eng 37:387–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2015.105744710.1080/01457632.2015.1057447 ↗
30. Li H-P, Chen F, Liu C-H, Tian Z-Z (2019) Error analysis and optimization of shear yield stress model for magnetorheological fluid. Arabian J Sci Eng 44:7779–7787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03903-w10.1007/s13369-019-03903-w ↗
31. Potnuru MR, Wang XJ, Mantripragada S, Gordaninejad F (2013) A compressible magneto-rheological fluid damper - liquid spring system. Int J Veh Des 63:256–27410.1504/IJVD.2013.056155 ↗
32. Ferreira AGM, Egas APV, Fonseca IMA, Costa AC, Abreu DC, Lobo LQ (2017) The viscosity of glycerol. J Chem Thermodyn 113:162–18210.1016/j.jct.2017.05.042 ↗
33. Liu Y, Wang QJ, Wang W, Hu Y, Zhu D, Krupka I, Hartl M (2006) EHL simulation using the free-volume viscosity model. Tribol Lett 23:27–3710.1007/s11249-006-9101-0 ↗
34. Dlubek G, Pionteck J, Sniegocka M, Hassan EM, Krause-Rehberg R (2007) Temperature and pressure dependence of the free volume in the perfluorinated polymer glass CYTOP: A positron lifetime and pressure-volume-temperature study. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 45:2519–2534. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.2124810.1002/polb.21248 ↗
35. Liu Y, Wang QJ, Bair S, Vergne P (2007) A quantitative solution for the full shear-thinning EHL point contact problem including traction. Tribol Lett 28:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-007-9262-510.1007/s11249-007-9262-5 ↗