Effects of step-quenching on the α″ martensitic transformation, α precipitation, and mechanical properties of multiphase Ti–10Mo alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of step-quenching on the microstructure and mechanical properties of a binary Ti–10Mo (wt%) alloy were investigated by transmission electron microscopy. The step-quenching treatment, consisting of solution treatment in the β phase field at 850 °C followed by step-quenching to the α/β two-phase region at 650 °C and holding for 0.5 h, was employed before water-quenching the alloy to room temperature. Direct quenching from 850 °C to room temperature with or without an aging step at 650 °C was also conducted for comparison. Microstructural observation revealed that step-quenching favored the formation of α precipitates thinner than 20 nm in the absence of α″ or ω heterogeneous nucleation agents and effectively moderated the subsequent α″ martensitic transformation by increasing the stability of the β phase. Step-quenching generated a multiphase microstructure comprising α″, β, ω, and α phases by balancing the competitive martensitic α″ and diffusional α transformations. Only α″ martensite was formed in the β matrix after direct water-quenching; the mixture of α″ + β phases was transformed to a lamellar α + β microstructure with 5 min aging. The kinetics of α precipitation was calculated to illustrate the temperature dependence of α precipitation behavior during step-quenching. Direct water-quenching produced a tensile strength of 688 MPa and 36% ductility. After aging, the tensile strength was increased to 837–867 MPa, while the ductility was decreased to 5%. By step-quenching, the high tensile strength of 790 MPa and ductility of 23% were achieved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Niinomi M, Nakai M, Hieda J (2012) Development of new metallic alloys for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 8:3888–390310.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.037 ↗
2. Miyazaki S, Kim HY, Hosoda H (2006) Development and characterization of Ni-free Ti-base shape memory and superelastic alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 438–440:18–2410.1016/j.msea.2006.02.054 ↗
3. Cotton JD, Briggs RD, Boyer RR, Tamirisakandala S, Russo P, Shchetnikov N, Fanning JC (2015) State of the art in beta titanium alloys for airframe applications. JOM 67:1281–130310.1007/s11837-015-1442-4 ↗
4. Lütjering G (1998) Influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of (α + β) titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 243:32–4510.1016/S0921-5093(97)00778-8 ↗
5. Furuhara T, Maki T, Makino T (2001) Microstructure control by thermomechanical processing in β-Ti-15-3 alloy. J Mater Process Technol 117:318–32310.1016/S0924-0136(01)00790-7 ↗
6. Li T, Kent D, Sha G, Dargusch MS, Cairne JM (2015) The mechanism of ω-assisted α phase formation in near β-Ti alloys. Scr Mater 104:75–7810.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.04.007 ↗
7. Prima F, Vermaut P, Texier G, Ansel D, Gloriant T (2006) Evidence of α-nanophase heterogeneous nucleation from ω particles in a β-metastable Ti-based alloy by high-resolution electron microscopy. Scr Mater 54:645–64810.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.024 ↗
8. Liang SX, Yin LX, Zheng LY, Ma MZ, Liu RP (2015) Preparation of low cost TiZrAlFe alloy with ultra-high strength and favorable ductility. Mater Sci Eng A 639:699–70410.1016/j.msea.2015.05.067 ↗
9. Chen YC, Chern Lin JH, Ju CP (2014) Effects of post-aging cooling condition on structure and tensile properties of aged Ti–7.5Mo alloy. Mater Des 545:15–519
10. Tang X, Ahmed T, Rack HJ (2000) Phase transformations in Ti–Nb–Ta and Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr alloys. J Mater Sci 35:1805–1811. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100479292215510.1023/A:1004792922155 ↗
11. Tomio Y, Furuhara T, Maki T (2009) Effect of cooling rate on superelasticity and microstructure evolution in Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al and Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al–0.2N alloys. Mater Trans 50:2731–273610.2320/matertrans.MA200909 ↗
12. Ingelbrecht CD (1985) The effect of step-quenching on the tensile properties and microstructure of the titanium alloy Ti–4Al–4Mo–2Sn–0.5Si (IMI 550). J Mater Sci 20:3034–3040. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0055307010.1007/BF00553070 ↗
13. Salvador CAF, Opini VC, Lopes ESN, Caram R (2017) Microstructure evolution of Ti–30Nb–(4Sn) alloys during classical and step-quench aging heat treatments. Mater Sci Technol 33:400–40710.1080/02670836.2016.1216030 ↗
14. Nag S, Zheng Y, Williams REA, Devaraj A, Boyne A, Wang Y, Collins PC, Viswanathan GB, Tiley JS, Muddle BC, Banerjee R, Fraser HL (2012) Non-classical homogeneous precipitation mediated by compositional fluctuations in titanium alloys. Acta Mater 60:6247–625610.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.033 ↗
15. Kobayashi S, Takeichi T, Nakai T, Sakamoto T (2014) Acceleration or suppression of α-phase precipitation using isothermal ω phase in Ti–20 at.pct Nb alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 45:1217–122910.1007/s11661-013-2092-1 ↗
16. Cardoso F, Ferrandini P, Lopes EN, Cremascoa A, Caram R (2014) Ti–Mo alloys employed as biomaterials: effects of composition and aging heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical behavior. J Mech Biomed Mater 32:31–3810.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.11.021 ↗
17. Wang CH, Liu M, Hu PF, Peng JC, Wang JA, Ren ZM, Cao GH (2017) The effects of α″ and ω phases on the superelasticity and shape memory effect of binary Ti–Mo alloys. J Alloys Compd 720:488–49610.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.299 ↗
18. Murray JL (1987) Phase diagrams of binary titanium alloys. ASM International, Metals Park
19. Moffat DL, Larbalestier DC (1988) The competition between martensite and omega in quenched Ti-Nb alloys. Metall Trans A 19:1677–168610.1007/BF02645135 ↗
20. Davis R, Flower HM, West DRF (1979) Martensitic transformations in Ti-Mo alloys. J Mater Sci 14:712–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0077273510.1007/BF00772735 ↗
21. Tang B, Cui YW, Kou H, Chang H, Li J, Zhou L (2012) Phase field modeling of isothermal β → ω phase transformation in the Zr–Nb alloys. Comput Mater Sci 61:76–8210.1016/j.commatsci.2012.04.007 ↗
22. Zheng Y, Williams REA, Sosa JM, Wang Y, Banerjee R, Fraser HL (2016) The role of the ω phase on the non-classical precipitation of the α phase in metastable β-titanium alloys. Scr Mater 111:81–8410.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.08.019 ↗
23. Zheng Y, Williams REA, Wang D, Shi R, Nag S, Kami P, Sosa JM, Banerjee R, Wang Y, Fraser HL (2016) Role of ω phase in the formation of extremely refined intragranular α precipitates in metastable β-titanium alloys. Acta Mater 103:850–85810.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.020 ↗
24. Yu Z, Zhou L (2006) Influence of martensitic transformation on mechanical compatibility of biomedical β type titanium alloy TLM. Mater Sci Eng A 438–440:391–394
25. Hanada S, Izumi O (1987) Correlation of tensile properties, deformation modes, and phase stability in commercial β-phase titanium alloys. Metall Trans A 18:265–27110.1007/BF02825707 ↗
26. Min XH, Tsuzaki K, Emura S, Tsuchiya K (2011) Enhancement of uniform elongation in high strength Ti–Mo based alloys by combination of deformation modes. Mater Sci Eng A 528:4569–457810.1016/j.msea.2011.02.071 ↗
27. Lin DJ, Chern Lin JH, Ju CP (2002) Structure and properties of Ti–7.5Mo–xFe alloys. Biomaterials 23:1723–173010.1016/S0142-9612(01)00233-2 ↗
28. Feeney JA, Blackburn MJ (1970) Effect of microstructure on the strength, toughness, and stress-corrosion cracking susceptibility of a metastable beta titanium alloy (Ti–11.5Mo–6Zr–4.5Sn). Metall Trans 1:3309–332310.1007/BF02642025 ↗
29. Lu J, Zhao Y, Ge P, Zhang Y, Niu H, Zhang W, Zhang P (2015) Precipitation behavior and tensile properties of new high strength beta titanium alloy Ti-1300. J Alloys Compd 637:1–410.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.222 ↗