Phase transitions of the synergistic effects of Ba2+O2TiO2/Mn4+O6 nanofluid with integration of electromagnetic field for improved oil recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Adil M, Lee K, Mohd Zaid H, Shukur MFA, Manaka T (2020) Effect of nanoparticles concentration on electromagnetic-assisted oil recovery using ZnO nanofluids. PLoS ONE 15(12):e024473810.1371/journal.pone.0244738 ↗
2. Adil M, Lee K, Mohd Zaid H, Ahmad Latiff NR, Alnarabiji MS (2018) Experimental study on electromagnetic-assisted ZnO nanofluid flooding for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). PLoS ONE 13(2):e019351810.1371/journal.pone.0193518 ↗
3. Sikiru S (2021) Ionic transport and influence of electromagnetic field interaction within electric double layer in reservoir sandstone. J Mol Liq 344:11767510.1016/j.molliq.2021.117675 ↗
4. Hassan YM et al (2022) The influence of ZnO/SiO2 nanocomposite concentration on rheology, interfacial tension, and wettability for enhanced oil recovery. Chem Eng Res Des 179:452–46110.1016/j.cherd.2022.01.033 ↗
5. Sikiru S, Soleimani H, Shafie A, Kozlowski G (2022) Simulation and experimental investigation of dielectric and magnetic nanofluids in reduction of oil viscosity in reservoir sandstone. J Pet Sci Eng 209:10982810.1016/j.petrol.2021.109828 ↗
6. Karimi A et al (2012) Wettability alteration in carbonates using zirconium oxide nanofluids: EOR implications. Energy Fuels 26(2):1028–103610.1021/ef201475u ↗
7. Alwated B, El-Amin MF (2021) Enhanced oil recovery by nanoparticles flooding: from numerical modeling improvement to machine learning prediction. Adv Geo-Energy Res 5(3):297–31210.46690/ager.2021.03.06 ↗
8. Bobbo S et al (2012) Viscosity of water based SWCNH and TiO2 nanofluids. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 36:65–7110.1016/j.expthermflusci.2011.08.004 ↗
9. Sikiru S, Yahya N, Soleimani H, Ali AM, Afeez Y (2020) Impact of ionic-electromagnetic field interaction on Maxwell–Wagner polarization in porous medium. J Mol Liq 318:11403910.1016/j.molliq.2020.114039 ↗
10. Adil M, Lee KC, Zaid HM, Manaka T (2020) Role of phase-dependent dielectric properties of alumina nanoparticles in electromagnetic-assisted enhanced oil recovery. Nanomaterials 10(10):197510.3390/nano10101975 ↗
11. Hwang C-C et al (2014) Carbon-based nanoreporters designed for subsurface hydrogen sulfide detection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(10):7652–765810.1021/am5009584 ↗
12. Hwang C-C et al (2012) Highly stable carbon nanoparticles designed for downhole hydrocarbon detection. Energy Environ Sci 5(8):8304–830910.1039/c2ee21574h ↗
13. Bhuvanesh M, Kalaiselvam S (2023) Enhanced oil recovery by polymer flooding using polyacrylamide stabilised with alumina/graphene oxide nanocomposite. Arab J Sci Eng 48(12):16819–1683010.1007/s13369-023-08135-7 ↗
14. Shiyi Y, Qiang W (2018) New progress and prospect of oilfields development technologies in China. Pet Explor Dev 45(4):698–71110.1016/S1876-3804(18)30073-9 ↗
15. Tong Q et al (2023) Research progress in nanofluid-enhanced oil recovery technology and mechanism. Molecules 28(22):747810.3390/molecules28227478 ↗
16. Tang W, Zou C, Liang H, Da C, Zhao Z (2022) The comparison of interface properties on crude oil–water and rheological behavior of four polymeric nanofluids (nano-SiO2, nano-CaO, GO and CNT) in carbonates for enhanced oil recovery. J Pet Sci Eng 214:11045810.1016/j.petrol.2022.110458 ↗
17. Luan J, Dong P, Zheng J (2020) Experimental studies on reaction laws during the process of air injection into the oil reservoirs with low permeability. J Pet Sci Eng 194:10752610.1016/j.petrol.2020.107526 ↗
18. Goharzadeh A, Fatt YY, Sangwai JS (2023) Effect of TiO2–SiO2 hybrid nanofluids on enhanced oil recovery process under different wettability conditions. Capillarity 8(1):1–1010.46690/capi.2023.07.01 ↗
19. Shengkai L, Xianjin X, Wei L, Lei W, Haijin N, Zhong S (2021) Monodisperse SiO2 microspheres with large specific surface area: preparation and particle size control. Res Appl Mater Sci 3(1):17–2310.33142/rams.v3i1.4493 ↗
20. Mansouri Zadeh M, Amiri F, Hosseni S, Ghamarpoor R (2024) Synthesis of colloidal silica nanofluid and assessment of its impact on interfacial tension (IFT) and wettability for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Sci Rep 14(1):32510.1038/s41598-023-51038-8 ↗
21. Song W, Hatzignatiou DG (2022) On the reduction of the residual oil saturation through the injection of polymer and nanoparticle solutions. J Pet Sci Eng 208:10943010.1016/j.petrol.2021.109430 ↗
22. Sikiru S et al (2021) Graphene: outlook in the enhance oil recovery (EOR). J Mol Liq 321:11451910.1016/j.molliq.2020.114519 ↗
23. Tuok LP, Elkady M, Zkria A, Yoshitake T, Nour Eldemerdash U (2023) Evaluation of stability and functionality of zinc oxide nanofluids for enhanced oil recovery. Micro Nano Syst Lett 11(1):1210.1186/s40486-023-00180-z ↗
24. Dai C et al (2018) Impairment mechanism of thickened supercritical carbon dioxide fracturing fluid in tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Fuel 211:60–6610.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.041 ↗
25. Safran SE, Kok MV (2022) Nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam to improve conventional CO2 EOR process and recovery at Batı Raman oil field, Turkey. J Pet Sci Eng 208:10954710.1016/j.petrol.2021.109547 ↗
26. Ortega DJS (2018) Alteration of the wetting character of a composite rock, through the use of nanoparticles as an enhanced oil recovery method, Ben Nevis Formation, Hebron Field, Jeanne d'Arc Basin, offshore Newfoundland, Canada. Memorial University of Newfoundland
27. Al-Anssari S, Ali M, Memon S, Bhatti MA, Lagat C, Sarmadivaleh M (2020) Reversible and irreversible adsorption of bare and hybrid silica nanoparticles onto carbonate surface at reservoir condition. Petroleum 6(3):277–28510.1016/j.petlm.2019.09.001 ↗
28. Yekeen N, Padmanabhan E, Idris AK, Chauhan PS (2019) Nanoparticles applications for hydraulic fracturing of unconventional reservoirs: a comprehensive review of recent advances and prospects. J Pet Sci Eng 178:41–7310.1016/j.petrol.2019.02.067 ↗
29. Radnia H, Rashidi A, Nazar ARS, Eskandari MM, Jalilian M (2018) A novel nanofluid based on sulfonated graphene for enhanced oil recovery. J Mol Liq 271:795–80610.1016/j.molliq.2018.09.070 ↗
30. Byrappa K, Adschiri T (2007) Hydrothermal technology for nanotechnology. Prog Cryst Growth Charact Mater 53(2):117–16610.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2007.04.001 ↗
31. Wang X, Li Y (2003) Synthesis and formation mechanism of manganese dioxide nanowires/nanorods. Chem A Eur J 9(1):300–30610.1002/chem.200390024 ↗
32. Cao G, Su L, Zhang X, Li H (2010) Hydrothermal synthesis and catalytic properties of α- and β-MnO2 nanorods. Mater Res Bull 45(4):425–42810.1016/j.materresbull.2009.12.016 ↗
33. Cheng G et al (2016) Controlled synthesis of α-MnO2 nanowires and their catalytic performance for toluene combustion. Mater Res Bull 75:17–2410.1016/j.materresbull.2015.11.017 ↗
34. Pang X et al (2023) Effect of solvents on the morphology and structure of barium titanate synthesized by a one-step hydrothermal method. Int J Miner Metall Mater 30(7):1407–141610.1007/s12613-023-2614-9 ↗
35. Julien CM, Massot M (2004) Vibrational spectroscopy of electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries iii. In: Oxideframeworks, proceedings of the international workshop “advanced techniques for energy sources investigation and testing” 4–9 Sept, Sofia, Bulgaria
36. Bernardini F, de Martino D, Mukai K, Falanga M, Masetti N (2019) 2PBC J0658.0–1746: a hard X-ray eclipsing polar in the orbital period gap. MNRAS 489(1):1044–105310.1093/mnras/stz1951 ↗
37. Hassan YM, Guan BH, Chuan LK, Hamza MF, Sikiru S (2023) Effect of silica-based hybrid nano-surfactant on interfacial tension reduction for enhanced oil recovery. Chem Eng Res Des 195:370–37710.1016/j.cherd.2023.05.050 ↗
38. Soleimani H, Sikiru S, Soleimani H, Khodapanah L, Sabet M (2023) Impact of anisotropy and electromagnetic modified effect on fluid mobility in reservoir sandstone. Defect Diffus Forum 429:179–18810.4028/p-WMZWk3 ↗
39. Aminian A, ZareNezhad B (2019) Wettability alteration in carbonate and sandstone rocks due to low salinity surfactant flooding. J Mol Liq 275:265–28010.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.080 ↗
40. Dehghan Monfared A, Ghazanfari MH, Jamialahmadi M, Helalizadeh A (2016) Potential application of silica nanoparticles for wettability alteration of oil–wet calcite: a mechanistic study. Energy Fuels 30(5):3947–396110.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00477 ↗
41. Al-Anssari S, Wang S, Barifcani A, Lebedev M, Iglauer S (2017) Effect of temperature and SiO2 nanoparticle size on wettability alteration of oil-wet calcite. Fuel 206:34–4210.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.077 ↗
42. Sofla SJD, James LA, Zhang Y (2018) Insight into the stability of hydrophilic silica nanoparticles in seawater for enhanced oil recovery implications. Fuel 216:559–57110.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.091 ↗
43. Hassan YM et al (2022) Electromagnetically modified wettability and interfacial tension of hybrid ZnO/SiO2 nanofluids. Crystals 12(2):16910.3390/cryst12020169 ↗