A PA/O-NGO/PPS sandwich composite membrane prepared via multi-step interfacial polymerization for desalination
Source abstract
Abstract
In view of the disadvantages of concentration polarization and trade-off effects in the application of membrane in desalination field, oxide-nano graphene oxide/polyamide (O-NGO/PA) loose intermediate layer and PA ultra-thin dense layer were introduced to fabricate PA/O-NGO/polyphenylene sulfide composite membrane with sandwich structure via multi-step interfacial polymerization (MS-IP) method. The selective permeation mechanism of ultrathin layer produced by different aqueous monomers (PIP and MPD) was studied, the effect of its physicochemical structure on the relief of concentration polarization phenomenon and the breakthrough of trade-off effect was analyzed. The ultra-thin and dense PA layer mainly played the role of interception and shortened the water molecular penetration path. In the retention test of metal salt solution, compared with the rough surface, it was found that the smooth surface was more conducive to the diffusion of intercepted metal ions into the feed solution, thus alleviating the concentration polarization phenomenon.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Graphene research and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Haddeland I, Heinke J, Biemans H et al (2014) Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:3251–3256. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122247511010.1073/pnas.1222475110 ↗
2. Liu T, Yang B, Graham N, Yu WZ, Sun KN (2017) Trivalent metal cation cross-linked graphene oxide membranes for NOM removal in water treatment. J Membr Sci 542:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.06110.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.061 ↗
3. Liu TY, Yuan HG, Li Q et al (2015) Ion-responsive channels of zwitterion-carbon nanotube membrane for rapid water permeation and ultrahigh mono-/multivalent ion selectivity. ACS Nano 9:7488–7496. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b0259810.1021/acsnano.5b02598 ↗
4. Gao Q, Xu J, Bu XH (2019) Recent advances about metal–organic frameworks in the removal of pollutants from wastewater. Coordin Chem Rev 378:17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2018.03.01510.1016/j.ccr.2018.03.015 ↗
5. Gao Y, Su KM, Li ZH, Cheng BW (2018) Graphene oxide hybrid poly(p-phenylene sulfide) nanofiltration membrane intercalated by bis(triethoxysilyl) ethane. Chem Eng J 352:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.18010.1016/j.cej.2018.06.180 ↗
6. Castro-Muñoz R, Gonzalez-Melgoza LL, García-Depraect O (2021) Ongoing progress on novel nanocomposite membranes for the separation of heavy metals from contaminated water. Chemosphere 270:129421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12942110.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129421 ↗
7. Petersen R (1993) Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 83:81–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(93)80014-O10.1016/0376-7388(93)80014-O ↗
8. Castro-Muñoz R (2020) Breakthroughs on tailoring pervaporation membranes for water desalination: a review. Water Res 187:116428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.11642810.1016/j.watres.2020.116428 ↗
9. Lau WJ, Ismail AF, Misdan N, Kassim MA (2011) A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: a review. Desalination 287:190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.00410.1016/j.desal.2011.04.004 ↗
10. Wang ZY, Wang ZX, Lin SH, Jin HL, Gao SJ, Zhu YZ (2018) Nanoparticle-templated nanofiltration membranes for ultrahigh performance desalination. Nat Commun 9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04467-310.1038/s41467-018-04467-3 ↗
11. Subramanian S, Seeram R (2013) New directions in nanofiltration applications-are nanofibers the right materials as membranes in desalination? Desalination 308:198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.08.01410.1016/j.desal.2012.08.014 ↗
12. Yoon K, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2009) High flux nanofiltration membranes based on interfacially polymerized polyamide barrier layer on polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous scaffolds. J Membr Sci 326:484–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.02310.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.023 ↗
13. Park HB, Kamcev J, Robeson LM, Elimelech M, Freeman BD (2017) Maximizing the right stuff: the trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science 356(eaab0530):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab053010.1126/science.aab0530 ↗
14. Zhang QG, Liu QL, Jiang ZY, Chen Y (2007) Anti-trade-off in dehydration of ethanol by novel PVA/APTEOS hybrid membranes. J Membr Sci 287:237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.04110.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.041 ↗
15. Jeong B, Subramani A, Yan Y (2005) Antifouling thin film nanocomposite (TFNC) membranes for desalination and water reclamation. In: AIChE annual meeting and fall showcase, https://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2005/techprogram/P24585.HTM
16. Tan Z, Chen SF, Peng XS, Zhang L, Gao CJ (2018) Polyamide membranes with nanoscale turing structures for water purification. Science 360:518–521. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar630810.1126/science.aar6308 ↗
17. Shao DD, Yang WJ, Xiao HF, Wang ZY, Zhou C, Cao XL, Sun SP (2020) Self-Cleaning nanofiltration membranes by coordinated regulation of carbon quantum dots and polydopamine. ACS Appl Mater Int 12:580–590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1670410.1021/acsami.9b16704 ↗
18. Mccutcheon JR, Elimelech M (2006) Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 284:237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.04910.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.049 ↗
19. Karan S, Samitsu S, Peng X, Kurashima K, Ichinose I (2012) Ultrafast viscous permeation of organic solvents through diamond-like carbon nanosheets. Science 335:444–447. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.121210110.1126/science.1212101 ↗
20. Gorgojo P, Karan S, Wong HC, Jimenez-Solomon M, Cabral JT, Livingston AG (2014) Ultrathin polymer films with intrinsic microporosity: anomalous solvent permeation and high flux membranes. Adv Funct Mater 24:4729–4737. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20140040010.1002/adfm.201400400 ↗
21. Karan S, Jiang Z, Livingston AG (2015) Sub-10 nm polyamide nanofilms with ultrafast solvent transport for molecular separation. Science 348:1347–1351. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa505810.1126/science.aaa5058 ↗
22. Song X, Qi S, Tang CY, Gao C (2017) Ultra-thin, multi-layered polyamide membranes: synthesis and characterization. J Membr Sci 540:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.01610.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.016 ↗
23. Gao Y, Su KM, Wang XT, Zhang ML, Li ZH, Jia K (2020) NGO/PA layer with disordered arrangement hybrid PPS composite membrane for desalination. Desalination 479:114211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.11421110.1016/j.desal.2019.114211 ↗
24. Hung WS, An QF, Guzman MD et al (2014) Pressure-assisted self-assembly technique for fabricating composite membranes consisting of highly ordered selective laminate layers of amphiphilic graphene oxide. Carbon 68:670–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.04810.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.048 ↗
25. Pan DY, Guo L, Zhang JC et al (2012) Cutting sp2 clusters in graphene sheets into colloidal graphene quantum dots with strong green fluorescence. J Mater Chem 22:3314–3318. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM16005F10.1039/C2JM16005F ↗
26. Gao Y, Su KM, Wang XT, Li ZH (2019) A Metal-nano go frameworks/pps membrane with super water flux and high dyes interception. J Membr Sci 574:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.05210.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.052 ↗
27. Wang X, Li ZH, Zhang ML, Fan TT, Cheng BW (2017) Preparation of a polyphenylene sulfide membrane from a ternary polymer/solvent/non-solvent system by thermally induced phase separation. RSC Adv 7:10503–10516. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA28762J10.1039/C6RA28762J ↗
28. Gao Y, Li ZH, Cheng BW, Su KM (2017) Superhydrophilic poly(p-phenylene sulfide) membrane preparation with acid/alkali solution resistance and its usage in oil/water separation. Sep Purif Technol 192:262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.06510.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.065 ↗
29. Xu Y, Li ZH, Su KM, Fan TT, Cao L (2018) Mussel-inspired modification of PPS membrane to separate and remove the dyes from the wastewater. Chem Eng J 341:371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.04810.1016/j.cej.2018.02.048 ↗
30. Xu Z, Zhang J, Shan M, Li Y, Li B, Niu J, Zhou B, Qian X (2014) Organosilane-functionalized graphene oxide for enhanced antifouling and mechanical properties of polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 458:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.05010.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.050 ↗
31. He DF, Shen LM, Zhang XY, Wang YF, Bao NZ, Kung HH (2014) An efficient and eco-friendly solution-chemical route for preparation of ultrastable reduced graphene oxide suspensions. AICHE J 60:2757–2764. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.1449910.1002/aic.14499 ↗
32. Song HS, Ko CH, Ahn W, Kim BJ, Croiset E, Chen ZW, Nam SC (2012) Selective dibenzothiophene adsorption on graphene prepared using different methods. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:10259–10264. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie301209c10.1021/ie301209c ↗
33. Murphy H, Papakonstantinou P, Okpalugo TIT (2006) Raman study of multiwalled carbon nanotubes functionalized with oxygen groups. J Vac Sci Technol B 24:715–720. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.218025710.1116/1.2180257 ↗
34. Wu MB, Yang HC, Wang JJ, Wu GP, Xu ZK (2017) Janus membranes with opposing surface wettability enabling oil-to-water and water-to-oil emulsification. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9:5062–5066. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0001710.1021/acsami.7b00017 ↗
35. Belfer S, Purinson Y, Kedem O (1998) Surface modification of commercial polyamide reverse osmosis membranes by radical grafting: an ATR-FTIR study. Acta Polym 49:574–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4044(199810)49:10/11%3c574::AID-APOL574%3e3.0.CO;2-010.1002/(SICI)1521-4044(199810)49:10/11<574::AID-APOL574>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
36. Seman MNA, Khayet M, Hilal N (2010) Nanofiltration thin-film composite polyester polyethersulfone-based membranes prepared by interfacial polymerization. J Membr Sci 348:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.04710.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.047 ↗
37. Nowbahar A, Mansard V, Mecca JM, Paul M, Arrowood T, Squires TM (2018) Measuring interfacial polymerization kinetics using microfluidic interferometry. J Am Chem Soc 140:3173–3176. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b1212110.1021/jacs.7b12121 ↗
38. Forsberg P, Nikolajeff F, Karlsson M (2011) Cassie-Wenzel and Wenzel-Cassie transitions on immersed superhydrophobic surfaces under hydrostatic pressure. Soft Matter 7:104–109. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0SM00595A10.1039/C0SM00595A ↗
39. Murakami D, Jinnai H, Takahara A (2014) Wetting transition from the Cassie-Baxter state to the Wenzel state on textured polymer surfaces. Langmuir 30:2061–2067. https://doi.org/10.1021/la404906710.1021/la4049067 ↗
40. Zhao S, Wang Z (2016) A loose nano-filtration membrane prepared by coating HPAN UF membrane with modified PEI for dye reuse and desalination. J Membr Sci 524:214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.03510.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.035 ↗
41. Chen YL, He CJ (2017) High salt permeation nanofiltration membranes based on NMG-assisted polydopamine coating for dye/salt fractionation. Desalination 413:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.03.00810.1016/j.desal.2017.03.008 ↗
42. Freger V (2003) Nanoscale heterogeneity of polyamide membranes formed by interfacial polymerization. Langmuir 19:4791–4797. https://doi.org/10.1021/la020920q10.1021/la020920q ↗
43. Schaep J, Bruggen BVD, Vandecasteele C, Wilms D (1998) Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration. Sep Purif Technol 14:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(98)00070-710.1016/S1383-5866(98)00070-7 ↗
44. Arjmandi M, Peyravi M, Altaee A, Arjmandi A, Chenar MP, Jahanshahi M, Binaeian E (2020) A state-of-the-art protocol to minimize the internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis membranes. Desalination 480:114355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.11435510.1016/j.desal.2020.114355 ↗