Entrapping polysulfides using mesoporous carbon hollow spheres with controlled internal SiO2 content for lithium–sulfur batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries, which are promising candidates for next-generation power sources, possess a high theoretical capacity of 1675 mAh g−1 and a high energy density of 2600 Wh kg−1. In addition, sulfur is an abundant, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly element suitable for large-scale production. However, Li–S batteries are still far from being used in practical applications because of known problems, including the insulating nature of sulfur, dissolution of polysulfide intermediates, and volume expansion of sulfur during the charge and discharge processes. To overcome these limitations, some efforts have been focused on the design of various structural matrices to encapsulate sulfur and develop new electrode active materials. In this study, a unique core-shell structure that mesoporous carbon hollow spheres with controllable SiO2 content as a sulfur host was designed. The hollow structure provides enough space to accommodate not only the active material, but also the volume changes during the charge and discharge processes. Moreover, the highly mesoporous structure can enhance the wettability and accessibility of the electrolyte, facilitating Li+ transfer, and confine the dissolved polysulfides in the pores. SiO2, a polar material, can effectively adsorb polysulfides and further enhance the electrochemical performance. An excellent reversible capacity of 694 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles at 0.1 C-rate was obtained, which is attributed to the dual physical and chemical effects. Therefore, mesoporous carbon hollow spheres with moderate SiO2 contents are promising sulfur hosts for advanced high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. The successful synthesis of the unique core-shell structure significantly alleviates the “shuttle effect” of polysulfides by the dual physical and chemical effects to enhance the electrochemical performance of lithium–sulfur batteries.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Goodenough JB, Kim Y (2010) Challenges for rechargeable Li Batteries. Chem Mater 22:587–603. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm901452z10.1021/cm901452z ↗
2. Chen Z, Kim GT, Kim JK, Zarrabeitia M, Kuenzel M, Liang HP, Geiger D, Kaiser U, Passerini S (2021) Highly stable quasi-solid-state lithium metal batteries: reinforced Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3/Li interface by a protection interlayer. Adv Energy Mater 11:2101339. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20210133910.1002/aenm.202101339 ↗
3. Liu Y, Zhao X, Chauhan GS, Ahn JH (2016) Nanostructured nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon derived from polyacrylonitrile for advanced lithium sulfur batteries. Appl Surf Sci 380:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.26110.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.261 ↗
4. Carter R, Oakes L, Muralidharan N, Cohn AP, Douglas A, Pint CL (2017) Polysulfide anchoring mechanism revealed by atomic layer deposition of V2O5 and sulfur-filled carbon nanotubes for lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9:7185–7192. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1615510.1021/acsami.6b16155 ↗
5. Liu Y, Li X, Heo J, Sun Y, Lee Y, Lim DH, Ahn HJ, Cho KK, Yang R, Ahn JH (2020) Effect of ordered carbon structures on electrochemical properties of carbon/sulfur composites in lithium-sulfur batteries. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 20:7057–7064. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2020.1883510.1166/jnn.2020.18835 ↗
6. She ZW, Li W, Cha JJ, Zheng G, Yang Y, Mcdowell MT, Hsu PC, Cui Y (2013) Sulphur-TiO2 yolk-shell nanoarchitecture with internal void space for long-cycle lithium-sulphur batteries. Nat Commun 4:1331. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms232710.1038/ncomms2327 ↗
7. Ji X, Lee KT, Nazar LF (2009) A highly ordered nanostructured carbon-sulphur cathode for lithium-sulphur batteries. Nat Mater 8:500–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat246010.1038/nmat2460 ↗
8. Yuan Y, Fang Z, Liu M (2017) Sulfur/hollow carbon nanofiber composite as cathode material for lithium-sulfur batteries. Int J Electrochem Sci 12:1025–1033. https://doi.org/10.20964/2017.02.2710.20964/2017.02.27 ↗
9. Ganesan A, Varzi A, Passerini S, Shaijumon MM (2016) Graphene derived carbon confined sulfur cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries: electrochemical impedance studies. Electrochim Acta 214:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.03010.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.030 ↗
10. Wang W, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Liu N, Bakenov Z (2021) Nickel embedded porous macrocellular carbon derived from popcorn as sulfur host for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J Mater Sci Technol 74:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.09.03210.1016/j.jmst.2020.09.032 ↗
11. Deng S, Li Q, Chen Y, Wang C, Zhao H, Xu J, Wu J, Yao X (2021) Dipolar and catalytic effects of an Fe3O4 based nitrogen-doped hollow carbon sphere frame work for high performance lithium sulfur batteries. Inorg Chem Front 8:1771–1778. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0QI01393E10.1039/D0QI01393E ↗
12. Cheng P, Cao D, Fang X, Zhao Y, Cao P, Liu D, He D (2022) Enhanced immobilization and accelerated conversion of polysulfides by functionalized separator for advanced lithium sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 539:231490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23149010.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231490 ↗
13. Li Y, Wu H, Wu D, Wei H, Guo Y, Chen H, Li Z, Wang L, Xiong C, Meng Q, Liu H, Chan CK (2022) High-density oxygen doping of conductive metal sulphides for better polysulfide trapping and Li2S-S8 Redox kinetics in high areal capacity lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Sci 9:2200840. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20220084010.1002/advs.202200840 ↗
14. Wu H, Tang Q, Fan H, Liu Z, Hu A, Zhang S, Deng W, Chen X (2017) Dual-confined and hierarchical-porous graphene/C/SiO2 hollow microspheres through spray drying approach for lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 255:179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.14010.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.140 ↗
15. Yao H, Zheng G, Hsu PC, Kong D, Cha JJ, Li W, Seh ZW, McDowell MT, Yan K, Liang Z, Narasimhan VK, Cui Y (2014) Improving lithium-sulphur batteries through spatial control of sulphur species deposition on a hybrid electrode surface. Nat Commun 5:3943. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms494310.1038/ncomms4943 ↗
16. Gueon D, Ju MY, Moon JH (2020) Complete encapsulation of sulfur through interfacial energy control of sulfur solutions for high-performance Li-S batteries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117:12686–12692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.20001281110.1073/pnas.200012811 ↗
17. Wang X, Li S, Yang G, Jin C, Huang S (2020) Insights into the resorcinol-formaldehyde resin coating process focusing on surface modification of colloidal SiO2 particles. Langmuir 36:2654–2662. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0359510.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03595 ↗
18. Su W, Luo C, Gao B, Zhang X, Fu J, Zheng Y, Chu PK (2021) Rice husks-derived hierarchical porous SiO2@C as efficient polysulfide mediator for Li-S batteries. Mater Lett 296:129926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.12992610.1016/j.matlet.2021.129926 ↗
19. Zhang C, Li K, Dai J, Zhang X, Li R, Zou J (2022) High-performance lithium-sulfur batteries achieved by a multifunctional SiO2-nanotubes/carbon composite interlayer. J Alloys Compd 895:162580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16258010.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162580 ↗
20. Zhao X, Kim M, Liu Y, Ahn HJ, Kim KW, Cho KK, Ahn JH (2018) Root-like porous carbon nanofibers with high sulfur loading enabling superior areal capacity of lithium sulfur batteries. Carbon 128:138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.02510.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.025 ↗
21. Liu L, Arumugam M (2017) Rational design of high-loading sulfur cathodes with a poached-egg-shaped architecture for long-cycle lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Energy Lett 2:2205–2211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0069710.1021/acsenergylett.7b00697 ↗
22. Tu S, Chen X, Zhao X, Cheng M, Xiong P, He Y, Zhang Q, Xu Y (2018) A polysulfide-immobilizing polymer retards the shuttling of polysulfide intermediates in lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 30:1804581. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180458110.1002/adma.201804581 ↗