Design and synthesis of core–shell porous carbon derived from porous polymer as sulfur immobilizers for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries have been receiving utmost interest in virtue of their high theoretical capacity, but the undesirable cycling performance caused by soluble polysulfide shuttling between anode and cathode has hindered its practical applications. This study represents the first report on microporous carbon “shell” derived from carbonization of porous polymer to encapsulate ordered mesoporous carbon “core” functioning as sulfur immobilizers for Li–S batteries. The dual-pore carbon matrix combines the excellent confinement ability of micropores (0.5 nm) and large pore volume (1.432 cm3 g−1) to improve sulfur loading capacity (71.3 wt%), thereby maintaining a capacity of 535 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles and a low fading rate of 0.30% per cycle. The merits of our exclusive core–shell architecture are established through comparative electrochemical performance analyses of individual mesoporous carbon and microporous carbon composites. Our experimental results bring out the excellent electrochemical performance of porous carbon composites, benefitting from its outstanding sulfur loading mass improving its overall capacity and its confinement capacity in the micropores alleviating polysulfide dissolution.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Tarascon JM, Armand M (2001) Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414:359–367. https://doi.org/10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
2. Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, Tarascon JM (2012) Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage. Nat Mater 11:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/NMAT319110.1038/NMAT3191 ↗
3. Manthiram A, Li L (2015) Hybrid and aqueous lithium-air batteries. Adv Energy Mater 5:1401302. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20140130210.1002/aenm.201401302 ↗
4. Zhou G, Zhao Y, Mathiram A (2015) Dual-confined flexible sulfur cathodes encapsulated in nitrogen-doped double-shelled hollow carbon spheres and wrapped with graphene for Li-s batteries. Adv Energy Mater 5:1402263. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20140226310.1002/aenm.201402263 ↗
5. Manthiram A, Fu Y, Chung S-H, Zu C, Su Y-S (2014) Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Rev 114:11751–11787. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500062v10.1021/cr500062v ↗
6. Hassoun J, Scrosati B (2010) Moving to a solid-state configuration: a valid approach to making lithium-sulfur batteries viable for practical applications. Adv Mater 22:5198–5201. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20100258410.1002/adma.201002584 ↗
7. Cuisinier M, Cabelguen P-E, Adams BD, Garsuch A, Balasubramanian M, Nazar LF (2014) Unique behaviour of nonsolvents for polysulphides in lithium-sulphur batteries, Energy Environ. Sci 7:2697–2705. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ee00372a10.1039/c4ee00372a ↗
8. Liu B, Thoi V-S (2020) Improving charge transfer in metal–organic frameworks through open site functionalization and porosity selection for Li-S batteries. Chem Mater 32:8450–8459. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0243810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02438 ↗
9. Chen H, Dong W-D, Xia F-J, Zhang Y-J, Yan M, Song J-P, Zou W, Liu Y, Hu Z-Y, Liu J, Li Y, Wang H-E, Chen L-H, Su B-L (2020) Hollow nitrogen-doped carbon/sulfur@MnO2 nanocomposite with structural and chemical dual-encapsulation for lithium-sulfur battery. Chem Eng J 381:122746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.12274610.1016/j.cej.2019.122746 ↗
10. Lee J, Moon J-H (2020) Polyhedral TiO2 particle-based cathode for Li-S batteries with high volumetric capacity and high performance in lean electrolyte. Chem Eng J 399:125670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12567010.1016/j.cej.2020.125670 ↗
11. Zhang R, Wu M, Fan X, Jiang H, Tran H-V, Zhao T (2019) Superior cycling life of Li–S batteries with high sulfur loading enabled by a bifunctional layered-MoO3 cathode. J Power Sources 436:226840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22684010.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226840 ↗
12. Jiang J, Zhu J, Ai W, Wang X, Wang Y, Zou C, Huang W, Yu T (2015) Encapsulation of sulfur with thin-layered nickel-based hydroxides for long-cyclic lithium-sulfur cells. Nat Commun 6:8622. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms962210.1038/ncomms9622 ↗
13. Yang W, Yang W, Song A, Sun G, Shao G (2018) 3D interconnected porous carbon nanosheets/carbon nanotubes as a polysulfide reservoir for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 10:816–824. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr06805k10.1039/c7nr06805k ↗
14. Tao X, Chen X, Xia Y, Huang H, Gan Y, Wu R, Chen F, Zhang W (2013) Highly mesoporous carbon foams synthesized by a facile, cast-effective and template-free Pechini method for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 1:3295–3301. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ta01213h10.1039/c2ta01213h ↗
15. Hou J, Tu X, Wu X, Shen M, Wang X, Wang C, Cao C, Pang H, Wang G (2020) Remarkable cycling durability of lithium-sulfur batteries with interconnected mesoporous hollow carbon nanospheres as high sulfur content host. Chem Eng J 401:126141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12614110.1016/j.cej.2020.126141 ↗
16. Dong Y, Ben T (2019) Impregnated sulfur in carbonized nitrogen-containing porous organic frameworks as cathode with high rate performance and long cycle life for lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Res Chinese Univ 35:654–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40242-019-9038-010.1007/s40242-019-9038-0 ↗
17. Zhou G, Wang D-W, Li F, Hou P-X, Yin L, Liu C, Lu G-Q, Gentle IR, Cheng H-M (2012) A flexible nanostructured sulphur-carbon nanotube cathode with high rate performance for Li-S batteries, Energy Environ. Sci 5:8901–8906. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee22294a10.1039/c2ee22294a ↗
18. Hu G, Sun Z, Shi C, Fang R, Chen J, Hou P, Liu C, Cheng H-M, Li F (2017) A sulfur-rich copolymer@CNT hybrid cathode with dual-confinement of polysulfides for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 29:1603835. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160383510.1002/adma.201603835 ↗
19. Baik S, Park J-H, Lee J-W (2020) One-pot conversion of carbon dioxide to CNT-grafted graphene bifunctional for sulfur cathode and thin interlayer of Li–S battery. Electrochim Acta 330:135264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13526410.1016/j.electacta.2019.135264 ↗
20. Xiao K, Chen Z, Liu Z, Zhang L, Cai X, Song C, Fan Z, Chen X, Liu J, Shen Z-X (2020) N-doped carbon sheets arrays embedded with CoP nanoparticles as high-performance cathode for Li-S batteries via triple synergistic effects. J Power Sources 455:227959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22795910.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227959 ↗
21. Zhang Z, Xiong D-G, Shao A-H, Huang X-Y, Huang Y, Yu J, Cai J-X, Yang Z-Y (2020) Integrating metallic cobalt and N/B heteroatoms into porous carbon nanosheets as efficient sulfur immobilizer for lithium-sulfur batteries. Carbon 167:918–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.01710.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.017 ↗
22. Fan Y, Ma F, Liang J, Chen X, Miao Z, Duan S, Wang L, Wang T, Han J, Cao R, Jiao S, Li Q (2020) Accelerated polysulfide conversion on hierarchical porous vanadium–nitrogen–carbon for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 12:584–590. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR09037A10.1039/C9NR09037A ↗
23. Gu X, Tong C-J, Lai C, Qiu J, Huang X, Yang W, Wen B, Liu L-M, Hou Y, Zhang S (2015) A porous nitrogen and phosphorous dual doped graphene blocking layer for high performance Li-S batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:16670–16678. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA04255K10.1039/C5TA04255K ↗
24. Song J, Xu T, Gordin M-L, Zhu P, Lv D, Jiang Y-B, Chen Y, Duan Y, Wang D (2014) Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon promoted chemical adsorption of sulfur and fabrication of high-areal-capacity sulfur cathode with exceptional cycling stability for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 24:1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20130263110.1002/adfm.201302631 ↗
25. Budd P-M, Ghanem B-S, Makhseed S, McKeown N-B, Msayib K-J, Tattershall C-E (2004) Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): robust, solution-processable, organic nanoporous materials. Chem Commun 2:230–231. https://doi.org/10.1039/b311764b10.1039/b311764b ↗
26. Zhao D, Feng J, Huo Q, Melosh N, Fredrickson GH, Chmelka B-F, Stucky G-D (1998) Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores. Science 279:548–552. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5350.54810.1126/science.279.5350.548 ↗
27. Meyer B (1976) Elemental sulfur. Rev Chem 76:367–388. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60301a00310.1021/cr60301a003 ↗
28. Ji X, Lee K-T, Zazar L-F (2009) A highly ordered nanostructured carbon-sulphur cathode for lithium-sulphur batteries. Nat Mater 8:500–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/NMAT246010.1038/NMAT2460 ↗
29. Xin S, Gu L, Zhao N-H, Yin Y-X, Zhou L-J, Guo Y-G, Wan L-J (2012) Smaller sulfur molecules promise better lithium-sulfur batteries. J Am Chem Soc 134:18510–18513. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja308170k10.1021/ja308170k ↗
30. Ryoo R, Joo S-H, Kruk M, Jaroniec M (2001) Ordered mesoporous carbons. Adv Mater 13:677–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(200105)13:9%3c677::AID-ADMA677%3e3.0.CO;2-C10.1002/1521-4095(200105)13:9<677::AID-ADMA677>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
31. Li Z, Yuan L, Yi Z, Sun Y, Liu Y, Jiang Y, Shen Y, Xin Y, Zhang Z, Huang Y (2014) Insight into the electrode mechanism in lithium-sulfur batteries with ordered microporous carbon confined sulfur as the cathode. Adv Energy Mater 4:1301473. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20130147310.1002/aenm.201301473 ↗
32. Jayaprakash N, Shen J, Moganty S-S, Corona A, Archer L-A (2011) Porous hollow carbon@sulfur composites for high-power lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5904–5908. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20110063710.1002/anie.201100637 ↗
33. Ji X, Nazar LF (2010) Advances in Li–S batteries. Nano Lett 20:9821–9826. https://doi.org/10.1039/b925751a10.1039/b925751a ↗