journal article·2022-02

Tuning thermal conductivity of surface-initiated polymer brushes

Wenhao Sha, Huizhong Wang, Fenglin Guo

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Surface-initiated polymer brushes are widely used in industrial applications owing to their programmable interfacial properties and manipulation over the harmonious combination of materials at the molecular level, particularly in surface-coating technologies. So far, surface-initiated polymer brushes are emerging as robust candidates for heat dissipation coatings. However, the brushes of carbon nanotubes, nanowires, or polymers show a terrible reduction of thermal conductivity, although a single carbon nanotube can exhibit a high value of thermal conductivity. Thus, how to control the thermal conductivity of surface-initiated polymer brushes remains a challenge for producing heat dissipation materials. Here we demonstrate programmable control of thermal conductivity of polymer brushes by tuning the grafted density on the target surface and the persistence length of polymer chains, using coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CGMD) simulations based on experimental data. Our simulation results show that the thermal conductivity of surface-initiated polymer brushes is anisotropic and a delicate balance between the grafted density and persistence length. Moreover, detailed structure analysis and phonon analysis are conducted to unveil the thermal characteristics of polymer brushes. We expect that our results may help broaden the industrial applications of surface-initiated polymer brushes.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Guo ZB, Sha WH, Yao HM (2019) Measuring thermal conductivity of ultra-small materials exampled by the reaction chambers of bombardier beetles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 134:1318–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.05910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.059 ↗
2. Lee V, Wu CH, Lou ZX, Lee WL, Chang CW (2017) Divergent and ultrahigh thermal conductivity in millimeter-long nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 118:135901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.13590110.1103/PhysRevLett.118.135901 ↗
3. Nadjahi C, Louahlia H, Lemasson S (2018) A review of thermal management and innovative cooling strategies for data center. Sust Comput 19:14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2018.05.00210.1016/j.suscom.2018.05.002 ↗
4. Bao H, Chen J, Gu X, Cao B (2018) A review of simulation methods in micro/nanoscale heat conduction. ES Energy Environ 1:16–55. https://doi.org/10.30919/esee8c14910.30919/esee8c149 ↗
5. Giussi JM, Cortez ML, Marmisolle WA, Azzaroni O (2019) Practical use of polymer brushes in sustainable energy applications: interfacial nanoarchitectonics for high-efficiency devices. Chem Soc Rev 48:814–849. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00705E10.1039/C8CS00705E ↗
6. Mukherji D, Singh MK (2021) Tuning thermal transport in highly cross-linked polymers by bond-induced void engineering. Phys Rev Mater 5:025602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.02560210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.025602 ↗
7. Choy CL, Wong YW, Yang GW, Kanamoto T (1999) Elastic modulus and thermal conductivity of ultradrawn polyethylene. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 37:3359–3367. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19991201)37:23%3c3359::AID-POLB11%3e3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19991201)37:23<3359::AID-POLB11>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
8. Shen S, Henry A, Tong J, Zheng R, Chen G (2010) Polyethylene nanofibres with very high thermal conductivities. Nat Nanotech 5:251–255. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.2710.1038/nnano.2010.27 ↗
9. Henry A (2014) Thermal transport in polymers. Annu rev heat transf 17:485–520. https://doi.org/10.1615/AnnualRevHeatTransfer.201300694910.1615/AnnualRevHeatTransfer.2013006949 ↗
10. Ruscher C, Rottler J, Boott CE, MacLachlan MJ, Mukherji D (2019) Elasticity and thermal transport of commodity plastics. Phys Rev Mater 3:125604. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.12560410.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.125604 ↗
11. Jakubinek MB, White MA, Li G, Jayasinghe C, Cho WD, Schulz MJ, Shanov V (2010) Thermal and electrical conductivity of tall, vertically aligned carbon nanotube arrays. Carbon 48:3947–3952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.06.06310.1016/j.carbon.2010.06.063 ↗
12. Kumanek B, Janas D (2019) Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube networks: a review. J Mater Sci 54:7397–7427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03368-010.1007/s10853-019-03368-0 ↗
13. Yamaguchi S, Tsunekawa I, Komatsu N, Gao WL, Shiga T, Kodama T, Kono J, Shiomi J (2019) One-directional thermal transport in densely aligned single-wall carbon nanotube films. Appl Phys Lett 115:223104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.512720910.1063/1.5127209 ↗
14. Feser JP, Sadhu JS, Azeredo BP, et al (2012) Thermal conductivity of silicon nanowire arrays with controlled roughness. J Appl Phys 112:114306. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476745610.1063/1.4767456 ↗
15. Henry A, Chen G, Plimpton SJ, Thompson A (2010) 1D-to-3D transition of phonon heat conduction in polyethylene using molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Rev B 82:144308–5. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.14430810.1103/PhysRevB.82.144308 ↗
16. Crnjar A, Melis C, Colombo L (2018) Assessing the anomalous superdiffusive heat transport in a single one-dimensional PEDOT chain. Phys Rev Mater 2:015603. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.01560310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.015603 ↗
17. Feng C, Huang XY (2018) Polymer brushes: efficient synthesis and applications. Acc chem res 51:2314–2323. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0030710.1021/acs.accounts.8b00307 ↗
18. Ritsema GC, Veldscholte LB, Nijkamp J, Beer S (2020) Sorption characteristics of polymer brushes in equilibrium with solvent vapors. Macromolecules 53:8428–843710.1021/acs.macromol.0c01637 ↗
19. Roy A, Bougher TL, Geng R, Ke YT, Locklin J, Cola BA (2016) Thermal conductance of poly(3-methylthiophene) brushes. ACS Appl Mater Interface 8:25578–25585. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b0442910.1021/acsami.6b04429 ↗
20. Bhardwaj A, Phani AS, Nojeh A, Mukherji D (2021) Thermal transport in molecular forests. ACS Nano 15:1826–1832. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c0974110.1021/acsnano.0c09741 ↗
21. van den Akker CC, Engel M, Velikov KP, Bonn M, Koenderink G (2011) Morphology and persistence length of amyloid fibrils are correlated to peptide molecular structure. J Am Chem Soc 133:18030–18033. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja206513r10.1021/ja206513r ↗
22. Hoogendam CW, Keizer A, Stuart MA, et al (1998) Persistence length of carboxymethyl cellulose as evaluated from size exclusion chromatography and potentiometric titrations. Macromolecules 31:6297–6309. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma971032i10.1021/ma971032i ↗
23. Ramachandran R, Beaucage G, Kulkarni AS, McFaddin D, Merrick-Mack J, Galiatsatos V (2008) Persistence length of short-chain branched polyethylene. Macromolecules 41:9802–9806. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma801775n10.1021/ma801775n ↗
24. Fakhri N, Tsyboulski DA, Cognet L, Weisman RB, Pasquali M (2009) Diameter-dependent bending dynamics of single-walled carbon nanotubes in liquids. Proc Nal Acad Sci 106:14219–14223. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.090414810610.1073/pnas.0904148106 ↗
25. Dunbar M, DeBenedictis E, Keten S (2019) Dimerization energetics of curli fiber subunits CsgA and CsgB. Npj Comput Mater 5:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0164-510.1038/s41524-019-0164-5 ↗
26. Manning GS (2006) The persistence length of DNA is reached from the persistence length of its null isomer through an internal electrostatic stretching force. Biophys J 91:3607–3616. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.08902910.1529/biophysj.106.089029 ↗
27. Wignall GD, Schelten J, Ballard DGH (1974) Measurements of radius of gyration and persistence length in bulk atactic polystyrene by low-angle neutron scattering. J Appl Crystallogr 7:190–190. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188987400920410.1107/S0021889874009204 ↗
28. Liu H, Song HL, Feng XQ, Yang JL (2014) Surface effects on the persistence length of nanowires and nanotubes. Theor Appl Mech Lett 4:051009. https://doi.org/10.1063/2.140510910.1063/2.1405109 ↗
29. Brandrup JI, Immergut EH, Grulke EA (2003) Polymer handbook, 4th edn. Hoboken, Wiley-Interscience
30. Sha WH, Fu JM, Guo FL (2021) Wetting characteristics of polymer adhesives with different chain bending stiffness. High Perform Polym 33:1220–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954008321103501610.1177/09540083211035016 ↗
31. Kremer K (1990) Dynamics of entangled linear polymer melts: a molecular-dynamics simulation. J Chem Phys 92:5057–5086. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.45854110.1063/1.458541 ↗
32. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
33. Yaghoobi P, Moghaddam MV, Nojeh A (2011) “Heat trap”: light-induced localized heating and thermionic electron emission from carbon nanotube arrays. Solid State Commun 151:1105–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2011.05.02410.1016/j.ssc.2011.05.024 ↗
34. Fan ZY, Pereira LF, Wang HQ, Zheng JC, Donadio D, Harju A (2015) Force and heat current formulas for many-body potentials in molecular dynamics simulations with applications to thermal conductivity calculations. Phys Rev B 92:094301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.09430110.1103/PhysRevB.92.094301 ↗
35. Boone P, Babaei H, Wilmer CE (2019) Heat flux for many-body interactions: corrections to LAMMPS. J Chem Theory Comput 15:5579–5587. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b0025210.1021/acs.jctc.9b00252 ↗
36. Manav M, Ponga M, Phani AS (2019) Stress in a polymer brush. J Mech Phys Sol 127:125–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2019.03.00910.1016/j.jmps.2019.03.009 ↗
37. Dickey JM, Paskin A (1969) Computer simulation of the lattice dynamics of solids. Phys Rev 188:1407–1418. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.188.140710.1103/PhysRev.188.1407 ↗
38. Liang T, Zhang P, Yuan P, Zhai SP (2018) In-plane thermal transport in black phosphorene/graphene layered heterostructures: a molecular dynamics study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:21151–21162. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP02831A10.1039/C8CP02831A ↗
39. Liang T, Zhou M, Zhang P, Yuan P, Yang DG (2020) Multilayer in-plane graphene/hexagonal boron nitride heterostructures: insights into the interfacial thermal transport properties. Int J Heat and Mass Transfer 151:119395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.11939510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119395 ↗
40. Loh GC, Teo E, Tay BK (2012) Phonon localization around vacancies in graphene nanoribbons. Diam Relat Mater 23:88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2012.01.00610.1016/j.diamond.2012.01.006 ↗
41. Henry A, Chen G (2008) High thermal conductivity of single polyethylene chains using molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Rev Lett 101:235502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.23550210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.235502 ↗
42. Zhang Z, Chen J (2018) Thermal conductivity of nanowires. Chin Phys B 27:035101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/27/3/03510110.1088/1674-1056/27/3/035101 ↗
43. Huo R, Zhang Z, Athir N, Fan YH, Liu J, Shi L (2020) Designing high thermal conductivity of cross-linked epoxy resin via molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22:19735–19745. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP02819C10.1039/D0CP02819C ↗