Data-driven search for promising intercalating ions and layered materials for metal-ion batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
The rise in demand for lithium-ion batteries has led to a large-scale search for electrode materials and intercalating ion species to meet the demands of next-generation energy technologies. Recent efforts largely focus on searching for cathodes that can accommodate large amounts of intercalating ions, but similar work on anodes is relatively limited. This study utilizes machine learning methods to find alternative two-dimensional (2D) materials and intercalating ions beyond Li for metal-ion batteries with high-power efficiencies. The approach first uses density functional theory (DFT) calculations to estimate the theoretical capacities and voltages of various metal ions on 2D materials. The DFT-generated data also provide insights into the local structural accommodation upon ion intercalation on various 2D materials. Significant changes to the lattice can result in irreversible changes to the bonding environments in the anode material, resulting in poor cycling stability. Next, this study develops a binding energy and structural accommodation-based classification model to screen anode materials for next-generation batteries. The classification model selects intercalating ions and 2D material pairs suitable for batteries based on the calculated voltage and volumetric changes in the 2D material upon intercalation. Finally, this study builds a regression model to accurately predict the binding energies of the various intercalating ions on 2D materials. The approach highlights the importance of different elemental and structural features for classification and regression tasks. The insights gained from this study on the role of involved features, such as electronegativities of the constituent ions and the presence of unfilled electronic levels, will help to streamline further studies towards the search for future layered battery materials.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Graphene research and applications · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Paul PP, McShane EJ, Colclasure AM et al (2021) A review of existing and emerging methods for lithium detection and characterization in Li-ion and li-metal batteries. Adv Energy Mater 11:2100372. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20210037210.1002/aenm.202100372 ↗
2. Yoshino A (2012) The birth of the lithium-ion battery. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:5798–5800. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20110500610.1002/anie.201105006 ↗
3. Li M, Lu J, Chen Z, Amine K (2018) 30 years of lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 30:1800561. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180056110.1002/adma.201800561 ↗
4. Scrosati B, Hassoun J, Sun Y-K (2011) Lithium-ion batteries. A look into the future. Energy Environ Sci 4:3287–3295. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE01388B10.1039/C1EE01388B ↗
5. Zhang M, Liu Y, Li D et al (2023) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: a new chapter in the fast and accurate estimation of the state of health for lithium-ion batteries. Energies 16:1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1604159910.3390/en16041599 ↗
6. Peng H, Zhao Q (2021) A nano-heterogeneous membrane for efficient separation of lithium from high magnesium/lithium ratio brine. Adv Funct Mater 31:2009430. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20200943010.1002/adfm.202009430 ↗
7. Li L, Zhang D, Deng J et al (2021) Carbon-based materials for fast charging lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 183:721–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.05310.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.053 ↗
8. Landi BJ, Ganter MJ, Cress CD, DiLeo RA, Raffaelle RP (2009) Carbon nanotubes for lithium ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 2:638–654. https://doi.org/10.1039/B904116H10.1039/B904116H ↗
9. Roberts AD, Li X, Zhang H (2014) Porous carbon spheres and monoliths: morphology control, pore size tuning and their applications as Li-ion battery anode materials. Chem Soc Rev 43:4341–4356. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00071D10.1039/C4CS00071D ↗
10. Liu Y, He X, Hanlon D et al (2016) Electrical, mechanical, and capacity percolation leads to high-performance MoS2/nanotube composite lithium ion battery electrodes. ACS Nano 10:5980–5990. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b0150510.1021/acsnano.6b01505 ↗
11. Yin L, Pham-Cong D, Jeon I et al (2020) Electrochemical performance of vertically grown WS2 layers on TiNb2O7 nanostructures for lithium-ion battery anodes. J Chem Eng 382:122800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.12280010.1016/j.cej.2019.122800 ↗
12. Goikolea E, Palomares V, Wang S et al (2020) Na-ion batteries—approaching old and new challenges. Adv Energy Mater 10:2002055. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20200205510.1002/aenm.202002055 ↗
13. Singh M, Ghosh C, Parida S et al (2021) In-situ TEM studies of structural modification in WS2 during intercalation of Li and Na. Microsc Microanal 27:654–656. https://doi.org/10.1017/S143192762100274910.1017/S1431927621002749 ↗
14. Hosaka T, Matsuyama T, Kubota K, Yasuno S, Komaba S (2020) Development of KPF6/KFSA binary-salt solutions for long-life and high-voltage K-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:34873–34881. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c0800210.1021/acsami.0c08002 ↗
15. Liu Z, Su H, Yang Y, Wu T, Sun S, Yu H (2021) Advances and perspectives on transitional metal layered oxides for potassium-ion battery. Energy Storage Mater 34:211–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.09.01010.1016/j.ensm.2020.09.010 ↗
16. Kim S, Yin L, Lee MH et al (2020) High-voltage phosphate cathodes for rechargeable Ca-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett 5:3203–3211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0166310.1021/acsenergylett.0c01663 ↗
17. Yamijala SSRKC, Kwon H, Guo J, Wong BM (2021) Stability of calcium ion battery electrolytes: predictions from Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:13114–13122. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c2171610.1021/acsami.0c21716 ↗
18. Yaghoobnejad Asl H, Fu J, Kumar H, Welborn SS, Shenoy VB, Detsi E (2018) In situ dealloying of bulk Mg2Sn in Mg-ion half cell as an effective route to nanostructured Sn for high performance Mg-ion battery anodes. Chem Mater 30:1815–1824. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0412410.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04124 ↗
19. Niu J, Zhang Z, Aurbach D (2020) Alloy anode materials for rechargeable Mg ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 10:2000697. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20200069710.1002/aenm.202000697 ↗
20. Guo Q, Zeng W, Liu S-L et al (2021) Recent developments on anode materials for magnesium-ion batteries: a review. Rare Met 40:290–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-020-01493-310.1007/s12598-020-01493-3 ↗
21. Elia GA, Kravchyk KV, Kovalenko MV, Chacón J, Holland A, Wills RGA (2021) An overview and prospective on Al and Al-ion battery technologies. J Power Sources 481:228870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22887010.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228870 ↗
22. Faegh E, Ng B, Hayman D, Mustain WE (2021) Practical assessment of the performance of aluminium battery technologies. Nat Energy 6:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00728-y10.1038/s41560-020-00728-y ↗
23. Kim J, Kim Y, Yoo J, Kwon G, Ko Y, Kang K (2023) Organic batteries for a greener rechargeable world. Nat Rev Mater 8:54–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00478-110.1038/s41578-022-00478-1 ↗
24. Ma D, Yuan D, Ponce C, de León Z, Jiang XX, Pan J (2023) Current progress and future perspectives of electrolytes for rechargeable aluminum-ion batteries. Energy Environ Mater 6:e12301. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.1230110.1002/eem2.12301 ↗
25. Yang Y, Zhou J, Wang L et al (2022) Prussian blue and its analogues as cathode materials for Na-, K-, Mg-, Ca-, Zn- and Al-ion batteries. Nano Energy 99:107424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10742410.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107424 ↗
26. Zhang T, Li D, Tao Z, Chen J (2013) Understanding electrode materials of rechargeable lithium batteries via DFT calculations. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 23:256–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2013.04.00510.1016/j.pnsc.2013.04.005 ↗
27. Sun Y, Shi X-L, Yang Y-L et al (2022) Biomass-derived carbon for high-performance batteries: from structure to properties. Adv Funct Mater 32:2201584. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20220158410.1002/adfm.202201584 ↗
28. Parida S, Mishra A, Chen J et al (2020) Vertically stacked 2H–1T dual-phase MoS2 microstructures during lithium intercalation: a first principles study. J Am Ceram Soc 103:6603–6614. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.1736710.1111/jace.17367 ↗
29. Liu Y, Guo B, Zou X, Li Y, Shi S (2020) Machine learning assisted materials design and discovery for rechargeable batteries. Energy Storage Mater 31:434–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.03310.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.033 ↗
30. Attia PM, Grover A, Jin N et al (2020) Closed-loop optimization of fast-charging protocols for batteries with machine learning. Nature 578:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1994-510.1038/s41586-020-1994-5 ↗
31. Chen X, Liu X, Shen X, Zhang Q (2021) Applying machine learning to rechargeable batteries: from the microscale to the macroscale. Angew Chem Int Ed 60:24354–24570. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20210736910.1002/anie.202107369 ↗
32. Hannan MA, Lipu MSH, Hussain A et al (2020) Toward enhanced state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using optimized machine learning techniques. Sci Rep 10:4687. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61464-710.1038/s41598-020-61464-7 ↗
33. Paulson NH, Kubal J, Ward L, Saxena S, Lu W, Babinec SJ (2022) Feature engineering for machine learning enabled early prediction of battery lifetime. J Power Sources 527:231127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23112710.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231127 ↗
34. Golmohammadi M, Aryanpour M (2023) Analysis and evaluation of machine learning applications in materials design and discovery. Mater Today Commun 35:105494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10549410.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105494 ↗
35. Ng M-F, Sun Y, Seh ZW (2023) Machine learning-inspired battery material innovation. Energy Adv 2:449. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3YA00040K10.1039/D3YA00040K ↗
36. Joshi RP, Eickholt J, Li L, Fornari M, Barone V, Peralta JE (2019) Machine learning the voltage of electrode materials in metal-ion batteries. Appl Mater Interfaces 11:18494–18503. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b0493310.1021/acsami.9b04933 ↗
37. Louis S-Y, Siriwardane EMD, Joshi RP, Omee SS, Kumar N, Hu J (2022) Accurate prediction of voltage of battery electrode materials using attention-based graph neural networks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14:26587–26594. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c0002910.1021/acsami.2c00029 ↗
38. Zhang Y, He X, Chen Z et al (2019) Unsupervised discovery of solid-state lithium ion conductors. Nat Commun 10:5260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13214-110.1038/s41467-019-13214-1 ↗
39. Chaney G, Ibrahim A, Ersan F, Çakır D, Ataca C (2021) Comprehensive study of lithium adsorption and diffusion on janus Mo/WXY (X, Y = S, Se, Te) using first-principles and machine learning approaches. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:36388–36406. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c0550810.1021/acsami.1c05508 ↗
40. Aykol M, Gopal CB, Anapolsky A et al (2021) Perspective—combining physics and machine learning to predict battery lifetime. J Electrochem Soc 168:030525. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abec5510.1149/1945-7111/abec55 ↗
41. Sui X, He S, Vilsen SB, Meng J, Teodorescu R, Stroe D-I (2021) A review of non-probabilistic machine learning-based state of health estimation techniques for Lithium-ion battery. Appl Energy 300:117346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11734610.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117346 ↗
42. Tong Z, Miao J, Tong S, Lu Y (2021) Early prediction of remaining useful life for Lithium-ion batteries based on a hybrid machine learning method. J Clean Prod 317:128265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12826510.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128265 ↗
43. Hosen MS, Youssef R, Kalogiannis T, Van Mierlo J, Berecibar M (2021) Battery cycle life study through relaxation and forecasting the lifetime via machine learning. J Energy Storage 40:102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.10272610.1016/j.est.2021.102726 ↗
44. Zhang Y, Zhao M (2023) Cloud-based in-situ battery life prediction and classification using machine learning. Energy Storage Mater 57:346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2023.02.03510.1016/j.ensm.2023.02.035 ↗
45. Song D, Chen X, Lin Z et al (2021) Usability identification framework and high-throughput screening of two-dimensional materials in lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano 15:16469–16477. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c0592010.1021/acsnano.1c05920 ↗
46. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
47. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 6:15–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
48. Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47:558. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
49. Wang V, Xu N, Liu J-C, Tang G, Geng W-T (2021) VASPKIT: a user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Comput Phys Commun 267:108033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10803310.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033 ↗
50. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD (1976) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13:5188. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
51. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
52. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
53. Haastrup S, Strange M, Pandey M et al (2018) The computational 2D materials database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Mater 5:042002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc110.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1 ↗
54. Gjerding MN, Taghizadeh A, Rasmussen A et al (2021) Recent progress of the computational 2D materials database (C2DB). 2D Mater 8:044002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ac105910.1088/2053-1583/ac1059 ↗
55. Ong SP, Richards WD, Jain A et al (2013) Python materials genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput Mater Sci 68:314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
56. Ward L, Dunn A, Faghaninia A et al (2018) Matminer: an open source toolkit for materials data mining. Comput Mater Sci 152:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.01810.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.018 ↗
57. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830
58. Eftekhari A (2017) Low voltage anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater 7:157–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.00910.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.009 ↗
59. Hamar JC, Erhard SV, Zoerr C, Jossen A (2021) Anode potential estimation in lithium-ion batteries using data-driven models for online applications. J Electrochem Soc 168:030535. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abe72110.1149/1945-7111/abe721 ↗
60. Jang B, Koo J, Park M et al (2013) Graphdiyne as a high-capacity lithium ion battery anode material. Appl Phys Lett 103:263904. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.485023610.1063/1.4850236 ↗
61. Liu T, Shao Y, Li G et al (2014) A facile approach using MgCl2 to formulate high performance Mg2+ electrolytes for rechargeable Mg batteries. J Mater Chem A 2:3430–3438. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA14825D10.1039/C3TA14825D ↗
62. Pan B, Huang J, Sa N et al (2016) MgCl2: the key ingredient to improve chloride containing electrolytes for rechargeable magnesium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 163:A1672. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0821608jes10.1149/2.0821608jes ↗