Nano-level insights on the interfacial wettability of graphene oxide-coated carbon fiber/epoxy composite
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrophoretic-deposited (EPD) graphene oxide (GO) on carbon fiber (CF) has been tried to improve the fiber/epoxy interfacial properties. However, the nano-level understanding on the mechanisms of surface wettability is still somewhat limited, which will be important to ensure the manufacturing ability of CF composites. In this work, the interfacial wetting behavior was systematically investigated via molecular dynamics simulations (MD). The results show significant improvement in interfacial properties by changing the morphology of GO-modified fiber surfaces. In details, appropriately increasing the deposition thickness, surface roughness, stacking angle and the distribution uniformity of GO sheets could enhance the wettability of the fiber surface, resulting in higher cohesive strength. The variation of bond stretching energy was the main factor that induced the change of the potential energy of the epoxy system during wetting simulations. Moreover, two obvious peaks of angular bending energy were observed at the solid–liquid and liquid–vapor surface, which may provide further insights into the formation mechanism of interfacial tensions.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Guades E, Aravinthan T, Islam M, Manalo A (2012) A review on the driving performance of FRP composite piles. Compos Struct 94:1932–1942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.004 ↗
2. Taraghi I, Fereidoon A, Taheri-Behrooz F (2014) Low-velocity impact response of woven Kevlar/epoxy laminated composites reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes at ambient and low temperatures. Mater Des 53:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.05110.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.051 ↗
3. Brahim B, Peng W, Minh T-TT et al (2002) Durability of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars in concrete environment. J Compos Constr 6:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:3(143)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:3(143) ↗
4. Shojaei A, Ghaffarian SR, Karimian SM-H (2003) Modeling and simulation approaches in the resin transfer molding process: a review. Polym Compos 24:525–54410.1002/pc.10050 ↗
5. Pan R, Liang Z, Zhang C, Wang B (2000) Statistical characterization of fiber permeability for composite manufacturing. Polym Compos 21:996–100610.1002/pc.10253 ↗
6. Struzziero G, Skordos AA (2019) Multi-objective optimization of resin infusion. Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci 5:17–28
7. Gou J, Zhang C, Liang Z et al (2003) Resin transfer molding process optimization using numerical simulation and design of experiments approach. Polym Compos 24:1–1210.1002/pc.10000 ↗
8. Ye X, Zhang C, Liang Z, Wang B (2004) Heuristic algorithm for determining optimal gate and vent locations for RTM process design. J Manuf Syst 23:267–27710.1016/S0278-6125(04)80039-6 ↗
9. Fu Y, Yao X, Gao X (2021) Micro-mesoscopic prediction of void defect in 3D braided composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 147:106450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10645010.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106450 ↗
10. Shields K, Colton J (1993) Resin transfer molding with powder-coated preforms. Polym Compos 14:341–34810.1002/pc.750140410 ↗
11. Ahn KJ, Seferis JC, Berg JC (1991) Simultaneous measurements of permeability and capillary pressure of thermosetting matrices in woven fabric reinforcements. Polym Compos 12:146–15210.1002/pc.750120303 ↗
12. Moosburger-Will J, Bauer M, Laukmanis E et al (2018) Interaction between carbon fibers and polymer sizing: Influence of fiber surface chemistry and sizing reactivity. Appl Surf Sci 439:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.25110.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.251 ↗
13. Xu P, Yu Y, Guo Z et al (2019) Evaluation of composite interfacial properties based on carbon fiber surface chemistry and topography: Nanometer-scale wetting analysis using molecular dynamics simulation. Compos Sci Technol 171:252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.02810.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.028 ↗
14. Bedi HS, Padhee SS, Agnihotri PK (2018). Effect of carbon nanotube grafting on the wettability and average mechanical properties of carbon fiber / polymer multiscale composites. Polymer Comp. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2471410.1002/pc.24714 ↗
15. Kong L, Wang X, Zheng W, et al (2020) Effects of plasma treatment on properties of carbon fiber and its reinforced resin composites. Mater Res Express 7. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab991010.1088/2053-1591/ab9910 ↗
16. Thomason JL, Yang L (2011) Temperature dependence of the interfacial shear strength in glass–fibre polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol 71:1600–1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.006 ↗
17. George J, Sreekala MS, Thomas S (2001) A review on interface modification and characterization of natural fiber reinforced plastic composites. Polym Eng Sci 41:1471–1485. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.1084610.1002/pen.10846 ↗
18. Lee W, Lee S-B, Choi O et al (2011) Formicary-like carbon nanotube/copper hybrid nanostructures for carbon fiber-reinforced composites by electrophoretic deposition. J Mater Sci 46:2359–2364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5082-310.1007/s10853-010-5082-3 ↗
19. An Q, Rider AN, Thostenson ET (2012) Electrophoretic deposition of carbon nanotubes onto carbon-fiber fabric for production of carbon/epoxy composites with improved mechanical properties. Carbon N Y 50:4130–4143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.06110.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.061 ↗
20. Chen Y, Xu D, Qiu H, Chen P (2020) Improvement of the interfacial properties of PBO/Epoxy composites by online continuous plasma grafting with polyurethane. Prog Org Coatings 143:105610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10561010.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105610 ↗
21. Taloub N, Henniche A, Liu L et al (2019) Improving the mechanical properties, UV and hydrothermal aging resistance of PIPD fiber using MXene (Ti3C2(OH)2) nanosheets. Compos Part B Eng 163:260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.007 ↗
22. Lu Z, Hanif A, Sun G et al (2018) Highly dispersed graphene oxide electrodeposited carbon fiber reinforced cement-based materials with enhanced mechanical properties. Cem Concr Compos 87:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.01.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.01.006 ↗
23. Zhang X, Sun T, Qiu B et al (2022) Investigation on interlaminar behavior of different morphology GO structured carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Part B Eng 230:109492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10949210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109492 ↗
24. Deng C, Jiang J, Liu F et al (2015) Influence of graphene oxide coatings on carbon fiber by ultrasonically assisted electrophoretic deposition on its composite interfacial property. Surf Coatings Technol 272:176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.04.00810.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.04.008 ↗
25. Wang M, Duong LD, Oh J-S et al (2014) Large-area, conductive and flexible reduced graphene oxide (RGO) membrane fabricated by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1747–1753. https://doi.org/10.1021/am404719u10.1021/am404719u ↗
26. Sheng K, Sun Y, Li C et al (2012) Ultrahigh-rate supercapacitors based on eletrochemically reduced graphene oxide for ac line-filtering. Sci Rep 2:247. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0024710.1038/srep00247 ↗
27. Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Rahighi R (2012) Toward single-DNA electrochemical biosensing by graphene nanowalls. ACS Nano 6:2904–2916. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300261t10.1021/nn300261t ↗
28. Wang S, Pei B, Zhao X, Dryfe RAW (2013) Highly porous graphene on carbon cloth as advanced electrodes for flexible all-solid-state supercapacitors. Nano Energy 2:530–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.12.00510.1016/j.nanoen.2012.12.005 ↗
29. Gao N, Yan Y (2012) Characterisation of surface wettability based on nanoparticles. Nanoscale 4:2202–2218. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr11736c10.1039/c2nr11736c ↗
30. Javan Nikkhah S, Moghbeli MR, Hashemianzadeh SM (2015) Investigation of the interface between polyethylene and functionalized graphene: a computer simulation study. Curr Appl Phys 15:1188–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2015.07.00710.1016/j.cap.2015.07.007 ↗
31. Li M, Zhou H, Zhang Y et al (2017) The effect of defects on the interfacial mechanical properties of graphene/epoxy composites. RSC Adv 7:46101–46108. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra08243f10.1039/c7ra08243f ↗
32. Li C, Browning AR, Christensen S, Strachan A (2012) Atomistic simulations on multilayer graphene reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 43:1293–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.015 ↗
33. Wei N, Lv C, Xu Z (2014) Wetting of graphene oxide: a molecular dynamics study. Langmuir 30:3572–3578. https://doi.org/10.1021/la500513x10.1021/la500513x ↗
34. Lundgren M, Allan NL, Cosgrove T, George N (2003) Molecular dynamics study of wetting of a pillar surface. Langmuir 19:7127–7129. https://doi.org/10.1021/la034224h10.1021/la034224h ↗
35. Kieu HT, Zhou K, Law AW-K (2019) Surface morphology effect on the evaporation of water on graphene oxide: amolecular dynamics study. Appl Surf Sci 488:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.24710.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.247 ↗
36. Tam L, He L, Wu C (2019) Molecular dynamics study on the effect of salt environment on interfacial structure, stress, and adhesion of carbon fiber/epoxy interface. Compos Interfaces 26:431–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2018.150690110.1080/09276440.2018.1506901 ↗
37. Xiao Y, Xian G (2018) Effects of moisture ingress on the bond between carbon fiber and epoxy resin investigated with molecular dynamics simulation. Polym Compos 39:E2074–E2083. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2445910.1002/pc.24459 ↗
38. Hou D, Yu J, Liu Q et al (2020) Nanoscale insight on the epoxy-cement interface in salt solution: a molecular dynamics study. Appl Surf Sci 509:145322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14532210.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145322 ↗
39. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
40. Stukowski A (2009) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:15012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
41. Young T (1805) III. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95:65–87. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1805.000510.1098/rstl.1805.0005 ↗
42. Properties C, Pp F, Behavior I et al (2022) Molecular dynamics simulation on the effect of self-resistance electric heating on carbon fiber surface
43. Patankar NA (2003) On the modeling of hydrophobic contact angles on rough surfaces. Langmuir 19:1249–1253. https://doi.org/10.1021/la026612+10.1021/la026612+ ↗
44. Lafuma A, Quéré D (2003) Superhydrophobic states. Nat Mater 2:457–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat92410.1038/nmat924 ↗
45. Koyanagi J, Itano N, Yamamoto M et al (2019) Evaluation of the mechanical properties of carbon fiber/polymer resin interfaces by molecular simulation. Adv Compos Mater 28:639–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2019.163006910.1080/09243046.2019.1630069 ↗
46. Roy S, Ansari KJ, Jampa SSK et al (2012) Influence of substrate wettability on the morphology of thin polymer films spin-coated on topographically patterned substrates. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:1887–1896. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300201a10.1021/am300201a ↗
47. Murakami D, Jinnai H, Takahara A (2014) Wetting transition from the cassie-baxter state to the wenzel state on textured polymer surfaces. Langmuir 30:2061–2067. https://doi.org/10.1021/la404906710.1021/la4049067 ↗
48. Duncan D, Li D, Gaydos J, Neumann AW (1995) Correlation of line tension and solid-liquid interfacial tension from the measurement of drop size dependence of contact angles. J Colloid Interface Sci 169:256–261. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1995.103210.1006/jcis.1995.1032 ↗
49. Marmur A (1997) Line tension and the intrinsic contact angle in solid–liquid–fluid systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 186:462–466. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1996.466610.1006/jcis.1996.4666 ↗
50. Amirfazli A, Keshavarz A, Zhang L, Neumann AW (2003) Determination of line tension for systems near wetting. J Colloid Interface Sci 265:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00521-610.1016/S0021-9797(03)00521-6 ↗
51. Boruvka L, Neumann AW (1977) Generalization of the classical theory of capillarity. J Chem Phys 66:5464–5476. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.43386610.1063/1.433866 ↗
52. Krauth W (2006) Statistical mechanics: algorithms and computations. OUP, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198515357.001.0001 ↗
53. Masuduzzaman M, Kim BH (2021) Effects of dissimilar molecular interface and ion-concentration on wetting characteristics of nanodroplets. Microfluid Nanofluidics 25:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-021-02455-610.1007/s10404-021-02455-6 ↗
54. Voronov RS, Papavassiliou DV, Lee LL (2007) Slip length and contact angle over hydrophobic surfaces. Chem Phys Lett 441:273–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2007.05.01310.1016/j.cplett.2007.05.013 ↗
55. Gong L, Zhang F, Peng X et al (2022) Improving the damping properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites by interfacial sliding of oriented multilayer graphene oxide. Compos Sci Technol 109309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10930910.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109309 ↗
56. Ghosh UU, Nair S, Das A et al (2019) Replicating and resolving wetting and adhesion characteristics of a Rose petal. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 561:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.10.02810.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.10.028 ↗
57. Majd MT, Shahrabi T, Ramezanzadeh B (2019) The role of neodymium based thin film on the epoxy/steel interfacial adhesion and corrosion protection promotion. Appl Surf Sci 464:516–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.10910.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.109 ↗