Pomegranate-like mesoporous double carbon-coated Fe2P nanoparticles as advanced anode materials for sodium-ion batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Anode materials have limited the development of sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). In this paper, the novel pomegranate-like mesoporous double carbon-coated Fe2P nanoparticles (Fe2P@C@NC), in which Fe2P is confined in the thin carbon shell derived from phytic acid and then wholly embedded into N-doped carbon network, can be applied as anode materials for SIBs. The elaborated structure presents several prominent merits, such as large specific surface area, pore-volume, excellent electronic conductivity network, and buffering volume expansion. All of these endow the structural integrity of Fe2P@C@NC material with excellent performance during charge–discharge cycles and guarantee speedy electrode reaction kinetics. As SIBs anode, Fe2P@C@NC material delivers an excellent reversible specific capacity of 408 mAh g−1 with almost no decay after the 100th cycles. And it also features excellent rate capability and splendid durability (attenuation rate of 0.05% per cycle with 1000th cycles) at high current density. These results confirm that the unique self-confined growth strategy has a great practical value in synthesizing advanced materials for next-generation energy storage systems.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon JM (2011) Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334:928–935. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.121274110.1126/science.1212741 ↗
2. Vaalma C, Buchholz D, Weil M, Passerini S (2018) A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries. Nat Rev Mater 3:1801310.1038/natrevmats.2018.13 ↗
3. Zhou Y, Zhang M, Wang Q et al (2020) Pseudocapacitance boosted N-doped carbon coated Fe7S8 nanoaggregates as promising anode materials for lithium and sodium storage. Nano Res 13:691–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-020-2677-010.1007/s12274-020-2677-0 ↗
4. Jiang F, Liu Y, Wang Q, Zhou Y (2018) Hierarchical Fe3O4@NC composites: ultra-long cycle life anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Sci 53:2127–2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1651-z10.1007/s10853-017-1651-z ↗
5. Yang L, Luo S-h, Wang Y et al (2021) Cu-doped layered P2-type Na0.67Ni0.33-xCuxMn0.67O2 cathode electrode material with enhanced electrochemical performance for sodium-ion batteries. Chem Eng J 404:126578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12657810.1016/j.cej.2020.126578 ↗
6. Feng J, Luo S-h, Yan S-x et al (2021) Hierarchically nitrogen-doped carbon wrapped Ni0.6Fe0.4Se2 binary-metal selenide nanocubes with extraordinary rate performance and high pseudocapacitive contribution for sodium-ion anodes. J Mater Chem A 9:1610–1622. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA08423A10.1039/D0TA08423A ↗
7. Liu W, Zhi H, Yu X (2019) Recent progress in phosphorus based anode materials for lithium/sodium ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater 16:290–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.02010.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.020 ↗
8. Nayak PK, Yang L, Brehm W, Adelhelm P (2018) From Lithium-Ion to Sodium-Ion Batteries: Advantages, Challenges, and Surprises. Angew Chem Int Edit 57:102–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20170377210.1002/anie.201703772 ↗
9. Tan H, Chen D, Rui X, Yu Y (2019) Peering into alloy anodes for sodium-ion batteries: current trends, challenges, and opportunities. Adv Func Mater 29:1808745. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20180874510.1002/adfm.201808745 ↗
10. Kim S-W, Seo D-H, Ma X, Ceder G, Kang K (2012) Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Batteries: Potential Alternatives to Current Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv Energy Mater 2:710–721. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20120002610.1002/aenm.201200026 ↗
11. Jiang F, Wang Q, Du R, Yan X, Zhou Y (2018) Fe7S8 nanoparticles attached carbon networks as anode materials for both lithium and sodium ion batteries. Chem Phys Lett 706:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2018.06.02310.1016/j.cplett.2018.06.023 ↗
12. Bao S, Luo S-h, Wang Z-y, Yan S-x, Wang Q (2019) Improving the electrochemical performance of layered cathode oxide for sodium-ion batteries by optimizing the titanium content. J Colloid Interface Sci 544:164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.02.09410.1016/j.jcis.2019.02.094 ↗
13. Lao M, Zhang Y, Luo W, Yan Q, Sun W, Dou SX (2017) Alloy-Based Anode Materials toward Advanced Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv Mater 29:1700622. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170062210.1002/adma.201700622 ↗
14. Shi S, Sun C, Yin X et al (2020) FeP Quantum Dots Confined in Carbon-Nanotube-Grafted P-Doped Carbon Octahedra for High-Rate Sodium Storage and Full-Cell Applications. Adv Func Mater 30:1909283. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20190928310.1002/adfm.201909283 ↗
15. Ge X, Li Z, Yin L (2017) Metal-organic frameworks derived porous core/shellCoP@C polyhedrons anchored on 3D reduced graphene oxide networks as anode for sodium-ion battery. Nano Energy 32:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.05510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.055 ↗
16. Wang YJ, Bian JL, Ren WN, Cheng CW (2021) Hollow CoP nanoparticles embedded in carbon nanotube arrays as sodium ion battery anode with superior performance. Mater Res Bull 139:111248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2021.11124810.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111248 ↗
17. Hu Z, Liu Q, Lai W et al (2020) Manipulating molecular structure and morphology to invoke high-performance sodium storage of copper phosphide. Adv Energy Mater 10:1903542. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20190354210.1002/aenm.201903542 ↗
18. Liu J, Wang S, Kravchyk K et al (2018) SnP nanocrystals as anode materials for Na-ion batteries dagger. J Mater Chem A 6:10958–10966. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta01492b10.1039/c8ta01492b ↗
19. Yang Y, Fu W, Lee DC et al (2020) Porous FeP/C composite nanofibers as high-performance anodes for Li-ion/Na-ion batteries. Mater Today Energy 16:100410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2020.10041010.1016/j.mtener.2020.100410 ↗
20. Zhao Z, Pathak R, Wang X, Yang Z, Li H, Qiao Q (2020) Sulfiphilic FeP/rGO as a highly efficient sulfur host for propelling redox kinetics toward stable lithium-sulfur battery. Electrochim. Acta 364:137117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13711710.1016/j.electacta.2020.137117 ↗
21. Wang Y, Lim YV, Huang S et al (2020) Enhanced sodium storage kinetics by volume regulation and surface engineering via rationally designed hierarchical porous FeP@C/rGO. Nanoscale 12:4341–4351. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr09278a10.1039/c9nr09278a ↗
22. Xu P, Dai K, Yang C et al (2020) Efficient synthesis of Cu3P nanoparticles confined in 3D nitrogen-doped carbon networks as high performance anode for lithium/sodium-ion batteries. J Alloy Compd 849:156436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15643610.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156436 ↗
23. Xu X, Feng J, Liu J et al (2019) Robust spindle-structured FeP@C for high-performance alkali-ion batteries anode. Electrochim Acta 312:224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.14910.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.149 ↗
24. Kim Y, Hwang H, Yoon CS, Kim MG, Cho J (2007) Reversible lithium intercalation in teardrop-shaped ultrafine SnP0.94 particles: an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 19:92–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20060064410.1002/adma.200600644 ↗
25. Liu Q, Hu Z, Liang Y et al (2020) Facile synthesis of hierarchical hollow CoP@C composites with superior performance for sodium and potassium storage. Angew Chem Int Edit 59:5159–5164. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20191368310.1002/anie.201913683 ↗
26. Popczun EJ, Read CG, Roske CW, Lewis NS, Schaak RE (2014) Highly active electrocatalysis of the hydrogen evolution reaction by cobalt phosphide nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Edit 53:5427–5430. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20140264610.1002/anie.201402646 ↗
27. Wang Y, Wu C, Wu Z et al (2018) FeP nanorod arrays on carbon cloth: a high-performance anode for sodium-ion batteries. Chem Commun 54:9341–9344. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cc03827a10.1039/c8cc03827a ↗
28. Gao X, Zhao C, Lu H, Gao F, Ma H (2014) Influence of phytic acid on the corrosion behavior of iron under acidic and neutral conditions. Electrochim Acta 150:188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.09.16010.1016/j.electacta.2014.09.160 ↗
29. Zhang G, Wang G, Liu Y, Liu H, Qu J, Li J (2016) Highly active and stable catalysts of phytic acid-derivative transition metal phosphides for full water splitting. J Am Chem Soc 138:14686–14693. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b0849110.1021/jacs.6b08491 ↗
30. Bao S, Luo S-h, Yan S-x et al (2019) Nano-sized MoO2 spheres interspersed three-dimensional porous carbon composite as advanced anode for reversible sodium/potassium ion storage. Electrochim Acta 307:293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.21610.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.216 ↗
31. Liu J, Hou W, Xiao Z et al (2019) Iron fumarate as large-capacity and long-life anode material for Li-ion battery boosted by conductive Fe2P decorating. J Alloy Compd 809:151826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15182610.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151826 ↗
32. Sadezky A, Muckenhuber H, Grothe H, Niessner R, Pöschl U (2005) Raman microspectroscopy of soot and related carbonaceous materials: Spectral analysis and structural information. Carbon 43:1731–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.01810.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018 ↗
33. Li Z, Zhao H, Du Z, Zhao L, Wang J, Zhang Z (2020) Iron phosphide@N-doped carbon nanosheets with open-framework structure as an ultralong lifespan and outstanding rate performance electrode material for sodium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 465:228253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22825310.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228253 ↗
34. Xia G, Zheng Z, Ye J, Li X, Biggs MJ, Hu C (2021) Carbon microspheres with embedded FeP nanoparticles as a cathode electrocatalyst in Li-S batteries. Chem Eng J 406:126823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12682310.1016/j.cej.2020.126823 ↗
35. Li X, Wang X, Yang W et al (2019) Three-dimensional hierarchical flowerlike FeP wrapped with N-doped carbon possessing improved Li(+) diffusion kinetics and cyclability for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:39961–39969. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1333010.1021/acsami.9b13330 ↗
36. Zhang X, Ou-Yang W, Zhu G, Lu T, Pan L (2019) Shuttle-like carbon-coated FeP derived from metal-organic frameworks for lithium-ion batteries with superior rate capability and long-life cycling performance. Carbon 143:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.00510.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.005 ↗
37. Zhang M, Yu J, Ying T, Yu J, Sun Y, Liu X (2019) P doped onion-like carbon layers coated FeP nanoparticles for anode materials in lithium ion batteries. J Alloy Compd 777:860–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.06010.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.060 ↗
38. Li Z, Zhang L, Ge X et al (2017) Core-shell structured CoP/FeP porous microcubes interconnected by reduced graphene oxide as high performance anodes for sodium ion batteries. Nano Energy 32:494–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.00910.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.009 ↗
39. Shi S, Li Z, Shen L et al (2020) Electrospun free-standing FeP@NPC film for flexible sodium ion batteries with remarkable cycling stability. Energy Storage Mater 29:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.03.02910.1016/j.ensm.2020.03.029 ↗
40. Xu X, Liu J, Liu Z et al (2018) FeP@C nanotube arrays grown on carbon fabric as a low potential and freestanding anode for high-performance li-ion batteries. Small 14:e1800793. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20180079310.1002/smll.201800793 ↗
41. Simon P, Gogotsi Y, Dunn B (2014) Materials science. Where do batteries end and supercapacitors begin? Science 343:1210–1211. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.124962510.1126/science.1249625 ↗
42. Wang L, Zhao X, Dai S, Shen Y, Wang M (2019) High-rate and stable iron phosphide nanorods anode for sodium-ion battery. Electrochim Acta 314:142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.07110.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.071 ↗
43. Augustyn V, Simon P, Dunn B (2014) Pseudocapacitive oxide materials for high-rate electrochemical energy storage. Energy Environ Sci 7:1597. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee44164d10.1039/c3ee44164d ↗
44. Augustyn V, Come J, Lowe MA et al (2013) High-rate electrochemical energy storage through Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitance. Nat Mater 12:518–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat360110.1038/nmat3601 ↗