journal article·2022-06

Investigation of structure and dynamics of water confined between hybrid layered materials of graphene, boron nitride, and molybdenum disulfide

Abhishek T. Sose, Esmat Mohammadi, Fangxi Wang, Sanket A. Deshmukh

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) materials like graphene, boron nitride, and molybdenum disulfide are utilized in diverse applications including catalysis, sensing, energy storage, biology, electronics, and so on. However, on a number of occasions, these 2D materials may not satisfy all the desired functions individually due to limitations in their properties. Thus, the urgency to generate new materials by combining and/or functionalizing these pure materials has emerged as a need of the current hour. The hybridization aids in cherishing a blend of new properties by a combination of pure materials. However, the performance of these materials in most of these applications also strongly depends on surrounding environmental factors like temperature, pressure, and especially humidity. Thus, understanding the structure of water near these hybrids and their interfaces is critical to facilitate the design of new devices with enhanced performance. Here, we have computationally designed novel layered hybrid materials of 2D sheets of graphene, boron nitride, and molybdenum disulfide by stacking them one above another. Subsequently, the structure of water in the vicinity of sheets and confined between them was studied using all-atom (AA) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. In order to understand the dynamics of water, sheets were modeled as flexible or rigid. The structural and dynamical characteristics of hybrids and water confined between these sheets were analyzed by employing radial distribution function (RDF), average atomic-density (z-density) profile of oxygen atoms, orientational tetrahedral order (OTO), asphericity of the Voronoi cell (AVC), O–H bond orientation of water molecules, mean squared displacement (MSD), and residence time probability (Pres(t)). Based on a visual inspection and in-depth analyses on the behavior of sheets when modeled as flexible, all water molecules confined between these sheets were eliminated due to stronger interactions between sheets and their disliking toward the water. Further, in the hybrids with sheets fixed at their crystallographic positions, structural and dynamical properties of water suggest that the hydrophilic interface of BN-MoS2 followed by BN-GR and GR-MoS2 favored the stable and ordered structure of water.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Membrane Separation Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Ashby MF, Bréchet YJM (2003) Designing hybrid materials. Acta Mater 51:5801–582110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00441-5 ↗
2. Sanchez C, Shea KJ, Kitagawa S (2011) Recent progress in hybrid materials science. Chem Soc Rev 40:471–47210.1039/c1cs90001c ↗
3. Kickelbick G (2014) Hybrid materials—past, present and future. Hybrid Mater 1:39–51
4. Munch E, Launey ME, Alsem DH et al (2008) Tough, bio-inspired hybrid materials. Science 322:1516–152010.1126/science.1164865 ↗
5. Le Bideau J, Viau L, Vioux A (2011) Ionogels, ionic liquid based hybrid materials. Chem Soc Rev 40:907–92510.1039/C0CS00059K ↗
6. Kim S, Ku SH, Lim SY et al (2011) Graphene-biomineral hybrid materials. Adv Mater 23:2009–201410.1002/adma.201100010 ↗
7. Wang J, Malgras V, Sugahara Y, Yamauchi Y (2021) Electrochemical energy storage performance of 2D nanoarchitectured hybrid materials. Nat Commun 12:356310.1038/s41467-021-23819-0 ↗
8. Guan G, Han M-Y (2019) Functionalized hybridization of 2D nanomaterials. Adv Sci 6:190183710.1002/advs.201901837 ↗
9. Jo YK, Lee JM, Son S, Hwang S-J (2019) 2D inorganic nanosheet-based hybrid photocatalysts: Design, applications, and perspectives. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 40:150–19010.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2018.03.002 ↗
10. Sinha S, Kim H, Robertson AW (2021) Preparation and application of 0D–2D nanomaterial hybrid heterostructures for energy applications. Mater Today Adv 12:10016910.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100169 ↗
11. Perivoliotis DK, Tagmatarchis N (2017) Recent advancements in metal-based hybrid electrocatalysts supported on graphene and related 2D materials for the oxygen reduction reaction. Carbon N Y 118:493–51010.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.073 ↗
12. Kickelbick G (2007) Hybrid Materials: synthesis, characterization, and applications. Wiley, New York
13. Lee SW, Cheon SA, Kim MI, Park TJ (2015) Organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers: types, characteristics, and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnology 13:5410.1186/s12951-015-0118-0 ↗
14. Forbes JR, Gros P (2001) Divalent-metal transport by NRAMP proteins at the interface of host–pathogen interactions. Trends Microbiol 9:397–40310.1016/S0966-842X(01)02098-4 ↗
15. Guo Y, Zhang Y, Liu H et al (2010) Assembled organic/inorganic p−n junction interface and photovoltaic cell on a single nanowire. J Phys Chem Lett 1:327–33010.1021/jz9002058 ↗
16. Zhang Y, Feng X, Yuan S et al (2016) Challenges and recent advances in MOF–polymer composite membranes for gas separation. Inorg Chem Front 3:896–90910.1039/C6QI00042H ↗
17. Geim AK (2009) Graphene: status and prospects. Science 324:1530–153410.1126/science.1158877 ↗
18. Blase X, Rubio A, Louie SG, Cohen ML (1994) Stability and band gap constancy of boron nitride nanotubes. EPL 28:33510.1209/0295-5075/28/5/007 ↗
19. Wang J, Lee CH, Yap YK (2010) Recent advancements in boron nitride nanotubes. Nanoscale 2:2028–203410.1039/c0nr00335b ↗
20. Golberg D, Costa PMFJ, Lourie O et al (2007) Direct force measurements and kinking under elastic deformation of individual multiwalled boron nitride nanotubes. Nano Lett 7:2146–215110.1021/nl070863r ↗
21. Hernández E, Goze C, Bernier P, Rubio A (1998) Elastic properties of C andBxCyNzComposite nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 80:4502–450510.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4502 ↗
22. Suryavanshi AP, Yu M-F, Wen J et al (2004) Elastic modulus and resonance behavior of boron nitride nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 84:2527–252910.1063/1.1691189 ↗
23. Chopra NG, Zettl A (1998) Measurement of the elastic modulus of a multi-wall boron nitride nanotube. Solid State Commun 105:297–30010.1016/S0038-1098(97)10125-9 ↗
24. Chang CW, Han W-Q, Zettl A (2005) Thermal conductivity of B–C–N and BN nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 86:17310210.1063/1.1914963 ↗
25. Zettl A, Chang CW, Begtrup G (2007) A new look at thermal properties of nanotubes. Physica Status Solidi (b) 24:4181–418310.1002/pssb.200776103 ↗
26. Chen Y, Zou J, Campbell SJ, Le Caer G (2004) Boron nitride nanotubes: pronounced resistance to oxidation. Appl Phys Lett 84:2430–243210.1063/1.1667278 ↗
27. Li H, Shi Y, Chiu M-H, Li L-J (2015) Emerging energy applications of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Energy 18:293–30510.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.023 ↗
28. Mattinen M, Leskelä M, Ritala M (2021) Atomic layer deposition of 2d metal dichalcogenides for electronics, catalysis, energy storage, and beyond. Adv Mater Interfaces 8:200167710.1002/admi.202001677 ↗
29. Dou M, Fyta M (2020) Lithium adsorption on 2D transition metal dichalcogenides: towards a descriptor for machine learned materials design. J Mater Chem A 8:23511–2351810.1039/D0TA04834H ↗
30. Monga D, Sharma S, Shetti NP et al (2021) Advances in transition metal dichalcogenide-based two-dimensional nanomaterials. Mater Today Chem 19:10039910.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100399 ↗
31. Li XL, Li TC, Huang S et al (2020) Controllable synthesis of two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide (MoS) for energy-storage applications. Chemsuschem 13:1379–139110.1002/cssc.201902706 ↗
32. Wang H, Zhao Y, Xie Y et al (2017) Recent progress in synthesis of two-dimensional hexagonal boron nitride. J Semicond 38:03100310.1088/1674-4926/38/3/031003 ↗
33. Sundararaju U, Mohammad Haniff MAS, Ker PJ, Menon PS (2021) MoS2/h-BN/graphene heterostructure and plasmonic effect for self-powering photodetector: A Review. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1407167210.3390/ma14071672 ↗
34. Li X, Zhu H (2015) Two-dimensional MoS2: properties, preparation, and applications. J Materiomics 1:33–4410.1016/j.jmat.2015.03.003 ↗
35. Bi H, Yin K, Xie X et al (2013) Ultrahigh humidity sensitivity of graphene oxide. Sci Rep 3:271410.1038/srep02714 ↗
36. Ghosh A, Late DJ, Panchakarla LS et al (2009) NO2and humidity sensing characteristics of few-layer graphenes. J Exp Nanosci 4:313–32210.1080/17458080903115379 ↗
37. Han T, Luo Y, Wang C (2014) Effects of temperature and strain rate on the mechanical properties of hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets. J Phys Appl Phys 47:02530310.1088/0022-3727/47/2/025303 ↗
38. Rand MJ, Roberts JF (1968) Preparation and properties of thin film boron nitride. J Electrochem Soc 115:42310.1149/1.2411238 ↗
39. Levita G, Restuccia P, Righi MC (2016) Graphene and MoS2 interacting with water: a comparison by ab initio calculations. Carbon 107:878–88410.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.072 ↗
40. Zhao X, Perry SS (2010) The role of water in modifying friction within MoS2 sliding interfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:1444–144810.1021/am100090t ↗
41. Melios C, Centeno A, Zurutuza A et al (2016) Effects of humidity on the electronic properties of graphene prepared by chemical vapour deposition. Carbon N Y 103:273–28010.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.018 ↗
42. Soltani A, Thévenin P, Bakhtiar H, Bath A (2005) Humidity effects on the electrical properties of hexagonal boron nitride thin films. Thin Solid Films 471:277–28610.1016/j.tsf.2004.06.142 ↗
43. Szmidt J (1992) Electric breakdown phenomena in C-BN layers. Diam Relat Mater 1:681–68310.1016/0925-9635(92)90190-Y ↗
44. Brożek T, Szmidt J, Jakubowski A, Olszyna A (1994) Electrical behaviour and breakdown in plasma deposited cubic BN layers. Diam Relat Mater 3:720–72410.1016/0925-9635(94)90256-9 ↗
45. Ronning C, Dreher E, Feldermann H et al (1997) Electrical properties and thermal stability of ion beam deposited BN thin films. Diam Relat Mater 6:1129–113410.1016/S0925-9635(97)00021-6 ↗
46. Pritchard C, Midgley JW (1969) The effect of humidity on the friction and life of unbonded molybdenum disulphide films. Wear 13:39–5010.1016/0043-1648(69)90430-X ↗
47. Kwac K, Kim I, Pascal TA et al (2017) Multilayer two-dimensional water structure confined in MoS2. J Phys Chem C 121:16021–1602810.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05153 ↗
48. Fang C, Wu X, Yang F, Qiao R (2018) Flow of quasi-two dimensional water in graphene channels. J Chem Phys 148:06470210.1063/1.5017491 ↗
49. Deshmukh SA, Kamath G, Baker GA et al (2013) The interfacial dynamics of water sandwiched between graphene sheets are governed by the slit width. Surf Sci 609:129–13910.1016/j.susc.2012.11.017 ↗
50. Jiao S, Duan C, Xu Z (2017) Structures and thermodynamics of water encapsulated by graphene. Sci Rep 7:264610.1038/s41598-017-02582-7 ↗
51. Lee MJ, Choi JS, Kim J-S et al (2012) Characteristics and effects of diffused water between graphene and a SiO2 substrate. Nano Res 5:710–71710.1007/s12274-012-0255-9 ↗
52. Maekawa Y, Sasaoka K, Yamamoto T (2019) Comparison between microscopic structures of surficial water on hexagonal boron nitride and graphene. Appl Phys Express 12:11500110.7567/1882-0786/ab49b7 ↗
53. Jiang J-W, Park HS, Rabczuk T (2013) Molecular dynamics simulations of single-layer molybdenum disulphide (MoS2): Stillinger-Weber parametrization, mechanical properties, and thermal conductivity. J Appl Phys 114:06430710.1063/1.4818414 ↗
54. Xiong S, Cao G (2015) Molecular dynamics simulations of mechanical properties of monolayer MoS2. Nanotechnology 26:18570510.1088/0957-4484/26/18/185705 ↗
55. Wagemann E, Wang Y, Das S, Mitra SK (2020) Wettability of nanostructured hexagonal boron nitride surfaces: molecular dynamics insights on the effect of wetting anisotropy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22:2488–249710.1039/C9CP06708F ↗
56. Dutta RC, Khan S, Singh JK (2011) Wetting transition of water on graphite and boron-nitride surfaces: A molecular dynamics study. Fluid Phase Equilib 302:310–31510.1016/j.fluid.2010.07.006 ↗
57. Raj R, Maroo SC, Wang EN (2013) Wettability of graphene. Nano Lett 13:1509–151510.1021/nl304647t ↗
58. Bejagam KK, Singh S, Deshmukh SA (2018) Development of non-bonded interaction parameters between graphene and water using particle swarm optimization. J Comput Chem 39:721–73410.1002/jcc.25141 ↗
59. Achari PF, Bejagam KK, Singh S, Deshmukh SA (2019) Development of non-bonded interaction parameters between hexagonal boron-nitride and water. Comput Mater Sci 161:339–34510.1016/j.commatsci.2019.02.011 ↗
60. Rana MK, Chandra A (2013) Ab initio and classical molecular dynamics studies of the structural and dynamical behavior of water near a hydrophobic graphene sheet. J Chem Phys 138:20470210.1063/1.4804300 ↗
61. Gordillo MC, Martí J (2008) Structure of water adsorbed on a single graphene sheet. Phys Rev B 78:07543210.1103/PhysRevB.78.075432 ↗
62. Brenner DW, Shenderova OA, Harrison JA et al (2002) A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons. J Phys Condens Matter 14:78310.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312 ↗
63. Kınacı A, Haskins JB, Sevik C, Çağın T (2012) Thermal conductivity of BN-C nanostructures. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 86:11541010.1103/PhysRevB.86.115410 ↗
64. Jiang J-W (2015) Parametrization of Stillinger-Weber potential based on valence force field model: application to single-layer MoS2 and black phosphorus. Nanotechnology 26:31570610.1088/0957-4484/26/31/315706 ↗
65. Wen M, Shirodkar SN, Plecháč P et al (2017) A force-matching stillinger-weber potential for MoS2: parameterization and fisher information theory based sensitivity analysis. J Appl Phys 122:24430110.1063/1.5007842 ↗
66. Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS et al (1992) UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 114:10024–1003510.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
67. Martínez L, Andrade R, Birgin EG, Martínez JM (2009) PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 30:2157–216410.1002/jcc.21224 ↗
68. Paesani F, Zhang W, Case DA et al (2006) An accurate and simple quantum model for liquid water. J Chem Phys 125:18450710.1063/1.2386157 ↗
69. Wu Y, Tepper HL, Voth GA (2006) Flexible simple point-charge water model with improved liquid-state properties. J Chem Phys 124:02450310.1063/1.2136877 ↗
70. Sose AT, Mohammadi E, Achari PF, Deshmukh SA (2022) Determination of accurate interaction parameters between the molybdenum disulfide and water to investigate their Interfacial properties. J Phys Chem C 126:2013–202210.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07313 ↗
71. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J comput phys 117(1):1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
72. Nosé S (1984) A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J Chem Phys 81:511–51910.1063/1.447334 ↗
73. Hoover WG (1985) Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A Gen Phys 31:1695–169710.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
74. Hockney RW, Eastwood JW (2021) Computer simulation using particles. CRC Press, USA10.1201/9780367806934 ↗
75. Altabet YE, Haji-Akbari A, Debenedetti PG (2017) Effect of material flexibility on the thermodynamics and kinetics of hydrophobically induced evaporation of water. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:E2548–E255510.1073/pnas.1620335114 ↗
76. Sharma S, Debenedetti PG (2012) Evaporation rate of water in hydrophobic confinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:4365–437010.1073/pnas.1116167109 ↗
77. Chow PK, Singh E, Viana BC et al (2015) Wetting of mono and few-layered WS2 and MoS2 films supported on Si/SiO2 substrates. ACS Nano 9:3023–303110.1021/nn5072073 ↗
78. Kozbial A, Gong X, Liu H, Li L (2015) Understanding the intrinsic water wettability of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2). Langmuir 31:8429–843510.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02057 ↗
79. Sose AT, Cornell HD, Gibbons BJ et al (2021) Modelling drug adsorption in metal–organic frameworks: the role of solvent. RSC Adv 11:17064–1707110.1039/D1RA01746B ↗
80. Narwani T, Etchebest C, Craveur P, et al (2019) In silico prediction of protein flexibility with local structure approach. arXiv [q-bio.QM]10.1016/j.biochi.2019.07.025 ↗
81. Sun W, Du J (2019) Local ordering and interfacial structure between spinel crystal and aluminosilicate glasses from molecular dynamics simulations. Int J Appl Glass Sci 10:41–5610.1111/ijag.12554 ↗
82. Wadhwa R, Yadav NS, Katiyar SP et al (2021) Molecular dynamics simulations and experimental studies reveal differential permeability of withaferin-A and withanone across the model cell membrane. Sci Rep 11:235210.1038/s41598-021-81729-z ↗
83. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ (2017) Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press, Cambridge10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 ↗
84. Frenkel D, Smit B (2001) Understanding Molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam
85. Haile JM (1997) Molecular dynamics simulation: elementary methods. Wiley, New York
86. Giorgino T (2014) Computing 1-D atomic densities in macromolecular simulations: The density profile tool for VMD. Comput Phys Commun 185:317–32210.1016/j.cpc.2013.08.022 ↗
87. Cicero G, Grossman JC, Schwegler E et al (2008) Water confined in nanotubes and between graphene sheets: a first principle study. J Am Chem Soc 130:1871–187810.1021/ja074418+ ↗
88. Mosaddeghi H, Alavi S, Kowsari MH, Najafi B (2012) Simulations of structural and dynamic anisotropy in nano-confined water between parallel graphite plates. J Chem Phys 137:18470310.1063/1.4763984 ↗
89. Chau P-L, Hardwick AJ (1998) A new order parameter for tetrahedral configurations. Mol Phys 93:511–51810.1080/002689798169195 ↗
90. Galamba N (2013) Water’s structure around hydrophobic solutes and the iceberg model. J Phys Chem B 117:2153–215910.1021/jp310649n ↗
91. Nutt DR, Smith JC (2008) Dual function of the hydration layer around an antifreeze protein revealed by atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 130:13066–1307310.1021/ja8034027 ↗
92. Midya US, Bandyopadhyay S (2014) Hydration behavior at the ice-binding surface of the Tenebrio molitor antifreeze protein. J Phys Chem B 118:4743–475210.1021/jp412528b ↗
93. Lee SL, Debenedetti PG, Errington JR (2005) A computational study of hydration, solution structure, and dynamics in dilute carbohydrate solutions. J Chem Phys 122:20451110.1063/1.1917745 ↗
94. Giovambattista N, Rossky PJ, Debenedetti PG (2009) Effect of temperature on the structure and phase behavior of water confined by hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and heterogeneous surfaces. J Phys Chem B 113:13723–1373410.1021/jp9018266 ↗
95. Agarwal M, Kushwaha HR, Chakravarty C (2010) Local order, energy, and mobility of water molecules in the hydration shell of small peptides. J Phys Chem B 114:651–65910.1021/jp909090u ↗
96. Malaspina DC, Schulz EP, Alarcón LM et al (2010) Structural and dynamical aspects of water in contact with a hydrophobic surface. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter 32:35–4210.1140/epje/i2010-10594-2 ↗
97. Elola MD, Ladanyi BM (2006) Computational study of structural and dynamical properties of formamide-water mixtures. J Chem Phys 125:18450610.1063/1.2364896 ↗
98. Bandyopadhyay D, Mohan S, Ghosh SK, Choudhury N (2014) Molecular dynamics simulation of aqueous urea solution: is urea a structure breaker? J Phys Chem B 118:11757–1176810.1021/jp505147u ↗
99. Duboué-Dijon E, Laage D (2015) Characterization of the Local structure in liquid water by various order parameters. J Phys Chem B 119:8406–841810.1021/acs.jpcb.5b02936 ↗
100. Kong Z, Zhang P, Ma X et al (2020) Characterization of water structure in carbon nanotubes by various order parameters. Chem Phys 538:11088710.1016/j.chemphys.2020.110887 ↗