Anisotropic transport properties of graphene-based conductor materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We analyzed nanographite-based materials in a combined study including experimental analysis via 4-point probe STM and simulation to provide a complete picture of microscopic and macroscopic properties of the material. The two- and three-dimensional transport regimes were determined and evaluated regarding the anisotropy of the conductivity. The experimental results yield the full macroscopic conductivity tensor. Microstructural simulations are used to map those macroscopic properties to the microscopic building blocks of the sample. By combining those two, we present a coherent and comprehensive description of the electrical material parameters across several length scales.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Thermal properties of materials · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Seol JH, Jo I, Moore AL, Lindsay L, Aitken ZH, Pettes MT, Li X, Yao Z, Huang R, Broido D, Mingo N, Ruoff RS, Shi L (2010) Science 328(5975):213. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.118401410.1126/science.1184014 ↗
2. Balandin AA (2011). Therm Prop Graphene Nanostructured Carbon Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat306410.1038/nmat3064 ↗
3. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Science 321(5887):385. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
4. Du X, Skachko I, Barker A, Andrei EY (2008) Nat Nanotechnol 3(8):491. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.19910.1038/nnano.2008.199 ↗
5. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GH, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen SBT, Ruoff RS (2006) Nature 442(7100):282. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0496910.1038/nature04969 ↗
6. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen SBT, Ruoff RS (2007) Carbon 45(7):1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.03410.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 ↗
7. Xu Z, Gao C (2011) Nat Commun 2(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms158310.1038/ncomms1583 ↗
8. Xu Z, Gao C (2015). Graphene Fiber New Trend Carbon Fibers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.06.00910.1016/j.mattod.2015.06.009 ↗
9. Aprojanz J, Dreyer B, Wehr M, Wiegand J, Baringhaus J, Koch J, Renz F, Sindelar R, Tegenkamp C (2017). J Phys Condens Matter. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa949410.1088/1361-648X/aa9494 ↗
10. Ali AB, Slawig D, Schlosser A, Koch J, Bigall NC, Renz F, Tegenkamp C, Sindelar R (2021) Carbon 172:28310.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.033 ↗
11. Aprojanz J, Power SR, Bampoulis P, Roche S, Jauho AP, Zandvliet HJW, Zakharov AA, Tegenkamp C (2018) Nat Commun 9(1):4426. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06940-510.1038/s41467-018-06940-5 ↗
12. Aprojanz J, Miccoli I, Baringhaus J, Tegenkamp C (2018). Appl Phys Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.505439310.1063/1.5054393 ↗
13. Miccoli I, Edler F, Pfnür H, Tegenkamp C (2015) J Phys Condens Matter 27:22. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/27/22/22320110.1088/0953-8984/27/22/223201 ↗
14. Albers J, Berkowitz HL (1985) J Electrochem Soc 132(10):2453. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.211359810.1149/1.2113598 ↗
15. Zolfaghar Tehrani S, Lim W, Lee L (2012) Measurement 45(3):21910.1016/j.measurement.2011.11.019 ↗
16. Versnel W (1983) J Appl Phys 54(2):91610.1063/1.332054 ↗
17. Mircea A (1964) J Sci Instrum 41(11):679. https://doi.org/10.1088/0950-7671/41/11/30710.1088/0950-7671/41/11/307 ↗
18. Bøggild P, Mackenzie DM, Whelan PR, Petersen DH, Buron JD, Zurutuza A, Gallop J, Hao L, Jepsen PU (2017). Mapp Electr Prop Large Area Graphene. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/aa868310.1088/2053-1583/aa8683 ↗
19. Melnikov AV, Shuba M, Lambin P (2018). Phys Rev E. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.04330710.1103/PhysRevE.97.043307 ↗
20. O’Callaghan C, Gomes Da Rocha C, Manning HG, Boland JJ, Ferreira MS (2016) Phys Chem Chem Phys 18(39):2756410.1039/C6CP05187A ↗
21. Dalmas F, Dendievel R, Chazeau L, Cavaillé JY, Gauthier C (2006) Acta Mater 54(11):2923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.02810.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.028 ↗
22. Sasaki KJ (2020). J Phys Soc Jpn. https://doi.org/10.7566/jpsj.89.09470610.7566/jpsj.89.094706 ↗
23. Rizzi L, Zienert A, Schuster J, Köhne M, Schulz SE (2018) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(49):43088. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1636110.1021/acsami.8b16361 ↗
24. Rizzi L, Zienert A, Schuster J, Köhne M, Schulz SE (2019) Comput Mater Sci 161:364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.02.02210.1016/j.commatsci.2019.02.022 ↗
25. Rizzi L, Wijaya AF, Palanisamy LV, Schuster J, Köhne M, Schulz SE (2020). Nano Express. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-959x/abb37a10.1088/2632-959x/abb37a ↗
26. Momeni Pakdehi D, Schädlich P, Nguyen TTN, Zakharov AA, Wundrack S, Najafidehaghani E, Speck F, Pierz K, Seyller T, Tegenkamp C, Schumacher HW (2020) Adv Funct Mater 30(45):200469510.1002/adfm.202004695 ↗
27. Kanagawa T, Hobara R, Matsuda I, Tanikawa T, Natori A, Hasegawa S (2003). Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.03680510.1103/PhysRevLett.91.036805 ↗
28. Edler F, Miccoli I, Demuth S, Pfnür H, Wippermann S, Lücke A, Schmidt WG, Tegenkamp C (2015). Phys Rev B Conden Matter Mater Phys. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.08542610.1103/PhysRevB.92.085426 ↗
29. Edler F, Miccoli I, Stöckmann JP, Pfnür H, Braun C, Neufeld S, Sanna S, Schmidt WG, Tegenkamp C (2017). Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.12540910.1103/PhysRevB.95.125409 ↗
30. Edler F, Miccoli I, Pfnür H, Tegenkamp C (2019). Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.10010.1103/PhysRevB.100 ↗
31. Ubbelohde ARJP (1972) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 327(1570):28910.1098/rspa.1972.0046 ↗
32. Banerjee S, Sardar M, Gayathri N, Tyagi AK, Raj B (2005). Phys Rev B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.07541810.1103/PhysRevB.72.075418 ↗
33. Cermak M, Perez N, Collins M, Bahrami M (2020) Sci Rep 10(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75393-y10.1038/s41598-020-75393-y ↗