journal article·2021-09

Effect of growth twins on strength and microstructural evolution of nanocrystalline aluminum

Yeqi Shi, Izabela Szlufarska

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 26
Publisher page

Abstract

The effect of growth-twins on friction, wear, and microstructural evolution of nanocrystalline (NC) aluminum is investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. NC Al with growth-twins has been previously synthesized experimentally, but the role of twins in deformation of this material has remained unknown. We find that twins increase strength and wear resistance of NC Al. The main reason is the anisotropy of plastic deformation since dislocations preferentially propagate along twin boundaries and therefore it is more difficult to nucleate dislocations in twinned sample with randomly oriented grains. The strengthening that comes from the increased stress required to nucleate dislocations in twinned samples can be off-set by the lower rate of strain hardening associated with the reduced dislocation densities. The balance of these effects is expected to depend on the grain size and twin spacing. Finally, our simulations reveal that dislocations in the neighboring twin layers move together, leading to a concerted confined layer slip.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Starke EA Jr, Staley JT (1996) Application of modern aluminum alloys to aircraft. Prog Aerosp Sci 32(2–3):131–17210.1016/0376-0421(95)00004-6 ↗
2. Vargel C (2020) CHAPTER A.3 The advantages of aluminium. In: Corrosion of aluminium, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science, p 13. https://www.elsevier.com/books/corrosion-of-aluminium/vargel/978-0-08-099925-8
3. Powell RW, Touloukian YS (1973) Thermal conductivities of the elements. Science 181(4104):999–100810.1126/science.181.4104.999 ↗
4. Feyzullahoğlu E, Şakiroğlu N (2011) The tribological behaviours of aluminium-based materials under dry sliding. Ind Lubr Tribol 63(5):350–35810.1108/00368791111154968 ↗
5. Pena A et al (2013) Micro-abrasion study of some dental restorative materials and enamel. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J of Eng Tribol 227(5):486–49510.1177/1350650113476440 ↗
6. Farhat ZN, Ding Y, Northwood DO, Alpas AT (1996) Effect of grain size on friction and wear of nanocrystalline aluminum. Mater Sci Eng A 206(2):302–31310.1016/0921-5093(95)10016-4 ↗
7. Hansen N (2004) Hall-Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scripta Mater 51(8):801–80610.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.002 ↗
8. Jin M et al (2004) Direct observation of deformation-induced grain growth during the nanoindentation of ultrafine-grained Al at room temperature. Acta Mater 52(18):5381–538710.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.044 ↗
9. Wei S et al (2021) Wear-induced microstructural evolution of ultra-fine grained (UFGs) aluminum. Acta Mater 209:11678710.1016/j.actamat.2021.116787 ↗
10. Shi Y, Szlufarska I (2020) Wear-induced microstructural evolution of nanocrystalline aluminum and the role of zirconium dopants. Acta Mater 200:432–44110.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.005 ↗
11. Sun HQ et al (2007) Plastic strain-induced grain refinement in the nanometer scale in a Mg alloy. Acta Mater 55(3):975–98210.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.018 ↗
12. Wang YM, Sansoz F, LaGrange T, Ott RT, Marian J, Barbee TW, Hamza AV (2013) Defective twin boundaries in nanotwinned metals. Nat Mater 12(8):697–70210.1038/nmat3646 ↗
13. Hertzberg RW, Vinci RP, Hertzberg JL (2013) Deformation and fracture mechanics of engineering materials. John Wiley & Sons Inc, NJ, p 80 (ISBN 978-0-470-52780-1). https://books.google.com/books?id=43ntDwAAQBAJ&printsec=copyright#v=onepage&q&f=false
14. Xue S et al (2015) The formation mechanisms of growth twins in polycrystalline Al with high stacking fault energy. Acta Mater 101:62–7010.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.046 ↗
15. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117(1):1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
16. Mishin Y, Mehl MJ, Papaconstantopoulos DA, Voter AF, Kress JD (2001) Structural stability and lattice defects in copper: Ab initio, tight-binding, and embedded-atom calculations. Phys Rev B 63(22):22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
17. Sheng HW, Kramer MJ, Cadien A, Fujita T, Chen MW (2011) Highly optimized embedded-atom-method potentials for fourteen fcc metals. Phys Rev B 83(13):13411810.1103/PhysRevB.83.134118 ↗
18. Stukowski A (2009) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO—the open visualization tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
19. Hirel P (2015) Atomsk: a tool for manipulating and converting atomic data files. Comput Phys Commun 197:212–21910.1016/j.cpc.2015.07.012 ↗
20. Justo JF, Bazant MZ, Kaxiras E, Bulatov VV, Yip S (1998) Interatomic potential for silicon defects and disordered phases. Phys Rev B 58(5):2539–255010.1103/PhysRevB.58.2539 ↗
21. Jones JE (1924) On the determination of molecular fields—I. From the variation of the viscosity of a gas with temperature. Proc R Soc Lond A 106(738):441–46210.1098/rspa.1924.0081 ↗
22. Rappé AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS, Goddard WA III, Skiff WM (1992) UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 114(25):10024–1003510.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
23. Rafailović LD et al (2019) High density of genuine growth twins in electrodeposited aluminum. Sci Adv 5(10):eaax389410.1126/sciadv.aax3894 ↗
24. Image-Pro (Plus 7) (2020) [Software]. Media Cybernetics, Inc. https://www.mediacy.com/imageproplus
25. Stukowski A, Bulatov VV, Arsenlis A (2012) Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 20(8):08500710.1088/0965-0393/20/8/085007 ↗
26. Honeycutt JD, Andersen HC (1987) Molecular dynamics study of melting and freezing of small Lennard-Jones clusters. J Phys Chem 91(19):4950–496310.1021/j100303a014 ↗
27. Roylance D (1996) The dislocation basis of yield and creep. In: Mechanics of materials. John Wiley and Sons, p 1–15. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/materials-science-and-engineering/3-11-mechanics-of-materials-fall-1999/modules/MIT3_11F99_dn.pdf
28. Bailey DJ, Flanagan WF (1967) The relationship between dislocation density and flow stress in materials deforming by a peierls-nabarro mechanism. Phil Mag 15(133):43–4910.1080/14786436708230350 ↗
29. Zhang F et al (2015) Dislocation–twin boundary interactions induced nanocrystalline via spd processing in bulk metals. Sci Rep 5(1):1–5
30. Wang J, Misra A (2011) An overview of interface-dominated deformation mechanisms in metallic multilayers. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 15(1):20–2810.1016/j.cossms.2010.09.002 ↗
31. Li N et al (2012) Direct observations of confined layer slip in Cu/Nb multilayers. Microsc Microanal 18(5):1155–116210.1017/S143192761200133X ↗