Effect of cation stoichiometry on the transport properties of calcium ruthenium oxide ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Seebeck coefficient and electrical resistivity have been determined on a series of compounds having the general composition CanRu1−nOy. From property and structural considerations, these compounds have been divided into two categories: one group resembling Ca2RuO4 and the second category exhibiting properties similar to CaRuO3. While the former is an antiferromagnetic insulator, the latter is a paramagnetic metal. The Seebeck coefficient remains relatively unchanged within the members of the two groups, irrespective of the molar ratios of the cations. Even between the two groups of compounds, the Seebeck coefficient exhibits minimal difference even as the cation ratio (Ru/Ca) of the compounds is varied from 0.35 (n = 0.74) to 1.94 (n = 0.34). The resistivity, however, varies by nine orders of magnitude as the cation ratio is varied in the same range. Consequently, the resulting power factor (s2σ, where s is the Seebeck coefficient and σ is the electrical conductivity), which is a measure of the usefulness or thermopower conversion efficiency of a thermoelectric material, is found to vary by nine orders of magnitude.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Cao G, McCall S, Shepard M, Crow JE, Guertin RP (1997) Phys Rev B 56:R2916. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.R291610.1103/PhysRevB.56.R2916 ↗
2. Nakatsuji S, Ikeda SI, Maeno Y (1997) J Phys Soc Jpn 66:1868. doi: https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.66.186810.1143/JPSJ.66.1868 ↗
3. Callaghan A, Moller W, Ward R (1966) Inorg Chem 5:1572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ic50043a02310.1021/ic50043a023 ↗
4. Crawford MK, Harlow RL et al (2002) Phys Rev B 65:214412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.21441210.1103/PhysRevB.65.214412 ↗
5. Maeno Y, Hashimoto H et al (1994) Nature 372:532. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/372532a010.1038/372532a0 ↗
6. Cao G, McCall S et al (1997) Phys Rev Lett 78:1751. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.175110.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1751 ↗
7. Eom CB, Cava RJ et al (1992) Science 258:1766. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.258.5089.176610.1126/science.258.5089.1766 ↗
8. Wang X, Xin Y et al (2004) App Phys Lett 85(25):614610.1063/1.1841451 ↗
9. Rane S, Prudenziati M, Morten B (2005). J Active Passive Elec Dev 1:123
10. Zurbuchen MA, Jia YF et al (2001) Appl Phys Lett 78:2351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.136465910.1063/1.1364659 ↗
11. Braden M, Andre G, Nakatsuji S, Maeno Y (1998) Phys Rev B 58:847. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.84710.1103/PhysRevB.58.847 ↗
12. Cao G, McCall S et al (2000) Phys Rev B 61:R5053. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.R505310.1103/PhysRevB.61.R5053 ↗
13. Fukazawa H, Maeno Y (2001) J Phys Soc Jpn 70:460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.70.46010.1143/JPSJ.70.460 ↗
14. Nakatsuji S, Maeno Y (2000) Phys Rev Lett 84:2666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.266610.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2666 ↗
15. Nakamura F, Goko T et al (2002) Phys Rev B 65:220402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.22040210.1103/PhysRevB.65.220402 ↗
16. Gibb TC, Greatrex RG et al (1973) J Chem Soc, Dalton Trans 1253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/dt973000125310.1039/dt9730001253 ↗
17. Klein L, Antognazza L et al (1999) Phys Rev B 60:1448. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.144810.1103/PhysRevB.60.1448 ↗
18. Felner I, Nowik I, Bradaric IM, Gospodinov M (2000). Phys Rev B 62:11332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1133210.1103/PhysRevB.62.11332 ↗
19. Friedt O, Braden M et al (2001) Phys Rev B. 63:17443210.1103/PhysRevB.63.174432 ↗
20. Cox PA, Egdell RG et al (1983) J Phys C Solid State Phys 16:6221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/16/32/01410.1088/0022-3719/16/32/014 ↗
21. Cao G, McCall S, Shepard M, Crow JE, Guertin RP (1997) Phys Rev B 56:321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.32110.1103/PhysRevB.56.321 ↗
22. Raveau B, Maignan A (2003) Europhys News 34(6)10.1051/epn:2003612 ↗
23. Hebert S, Martin C et al (2001) Proceedings of the 6th European workshop on thermoelectrics, Freiburg
24. Van der Pauw LJ (1958) Philips Res Rep 13:1
25. Mott NF, Davis EA (1979) Electronic processes in non-crystalline materials. Clarendon Press, London
26. Bossman AL, Crevecoeur C (1966) Phys Rev 144:763. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.144.76310.1103/PhysRev.144.763 ↗
27. Klein Y, Hébert S et al (2006) Phys Rev B 73:052412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.05241210.1103/PhysRevB.73.052412 ↗