Application of explainable artificial intelligence for prediction and feature analysis of carbon diffusivity in austenite
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon diffusivity in austenite is an important value in heat treatment, such as annealing and normalizing, for controlling the overall properties of steels. However, it is still a challenge to improve the model to more accurately predict the carbon diffusivity and analyze the features. Here, machine learning methods were employed to precisely predict carbon diffusivity and provide specific insights into prediction mechanisms of features. Shapley additive explanation method was employed to analyze the feature mechanisms. A total of 263 utilizable datasets were collected from the literature and analyzed, and three outliers were discarded. We then searched for hyperparameters using fivefold cross-validation and a grid search. Random forest regression (RFR) was selected based on the determination coefficient. The RFR was validated with an empirical equation using training, testing, and additional datasets. The importance and mechanisms of input features such as temperature, carbon concentration, Cr, Ni, Si, Al, Mn, and Mo were discussed using the calculation results of the Shapley value. Temperature had the greatest influence on carbon diffusivity, followed by carbon concentration, Cr, Si, Mo, Ni, Al, and Mn. Temperature, carbon concentration, Mo, Ni, and Mn increased carbon diffusivity but Cr, Si, and Al decreased carbon diffusivity.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Totten GE (2007) Steel heat treatment: metallurgy and technologies. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, New York
2. Rajan TV, Sharma CP, Sharma A (2006) Heat treatment, principles and techniques. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi
3. Speich GR, Demarest VA, Miller RL (1981) Formation of austenite during intercritical annealing of dual–phase steels. Met Trans A 12:1419–142810.1007/BF02643686 ↗
4. Lee S-J, Lee S, De Cooman BC (2011) Mn partitioning during the interciritical annealing of ultrafine–grained 6% Mn transformation–induced plasticity steel. Scripta 64:649–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.12.01210.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.12.012 ↗
5. Jeong MS, Park TM, Choi S, Lee S-J, Han J (2021) Recovering the ductility of medium–Mn steel by restoring the original microstructure. Scripta 190:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.08.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.08.022 ↗
6. De Cooman BC, Lee SJ, Shin S, Seo EJ, Speer JG (2016) Combined intercritical annealing and Q&P processing of medium Mn steel. Mat Mater Trans A 48:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3821-z10.1007/s11661-016-3821-z ↗
7. Lee S-J, Matlock DK, Van Tyne CJ (2011) An empirical model for carbon diffusion in austenite incorporating alloying element effects. ISIJ Int 51:1903–1911. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.51.190310.2355/isijinternational.51.1903 ↗
8. Krishtal MA (1970) Diffusion processes in iron alloys. Isr Progr Sci Transl Jerus 90:175–203
9. Smith RP (1964) The diffusivity of carbon in–Fe–Co alloys. Trans AIME 230:476–480
10. Ismail MI, Iskander SS, Saleh EB (1981) Surf Technol 12: 341–349. 0376–4883/81/0000–0000/$02.5010.1016/0376-4583(81)90028-5 ↗
11. Zhang X, Takahashi R, Akiyama T, Yagi J (1997) Carburization rate into solid iron at Co–CO2 atmosphere Tetsu–to–Hagané 83: 299–304. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.83.5_29910.2355/tetsutohagane1955.83.5_299 ↗
12. Murakami T, Fukuyama H, Nagata K (2001) Mechanisms of carburization and melting of iron by CO gas. ISIJ Int 41:416–421. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.41.41610.2355/isijinternational.41.416 ↗
13. Wells C, Batz W, Mehl RF (1950) Diffusion coefficient of carbon in austenite. Trans AIME 188:553–560
14. Kaufman LR, Radcliffe SV, Cohen M (1962) Decomposition of austenite by diffusional processes. Interscience Publishers, New York
15. Tibbetts GG (1980) Diffusivity of carbon in iron and steels at high temperatures. J Appl Phys 51:4813–481610.1063/1.328314 ↗
16. Swetlana S, Khatavkar N, Singh AK (2020) Development of Vickers hardness prediction models via microstructural analysis and machine learning. J Mater Sci 55:15845–15856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05153-w10.1007/s10853-020-05153-w ↗
17. Zhang H, Fu H, He X, Wang C, Jiang L, Chen L-Q, Xie J (2020) Dramatically enhanced combination of ultimate tensile strength and electric conductivity of alloys via machine learning screening. Acta Mater 200:803–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.06810.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.068 ↗
18. Eren B, Guvenc MA, Mistikoglu S (2021) Artificial intelligence applications for friction stir welding: a review. Met Mater Int 27:193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00854-y10.1007/s12540-020-00854-y ↗
19. Thankachan T, Prakash KS, Kavimani V, Silambarasan SR (2021) Machine learning and statistical approach to predict and analyze wear rates in copper surface composites. Met Mater Int 27:220–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00809-310.1007/s12540-020-00809-3 ↗
20. Zhang Y, Xu X (2021) Lattice misfit predictions via the Gaussian process regression for Ni-based single crystal superalloys. Met Mater Int 27:235–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00883-710.1007/s12540-020-00883-7 ↗
21. Lee J-W, Park C, Lee BD, Park J, Goo NH, Sohn K-S (2021) A machine–learning–based alloy design platform that enables both forward and inverse predictions for thermo–mechanically controlled processed (TMCP) steel alloys. Sci Rep 11:11012–11029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90237-z10.1038/s41598-021-90237-z ↗
22. Jeon J, Seo N, Kim H-J, Lee M-H, Lim H-K, Son SB, Lee S-J (2021) Inverse design of Fe-based bulk metallic glasses using machine learning. Metals 11:729–736. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1105072910.3390/met11050729 ↗
23. Jeon J, Kim G, Seo N, Choi H, Kim H-J, Lee M-H, Lim H-K, Son SB, Lee S-J (2022) Combined data–driven model for the prediction of thermal properties of Ni-based amorphous alloys. J Mater Res Technol 16:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.00310.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.003 ↗
24. Hong D, Kwon S, Yim C (2021) Exploration of machine learning to predict hot ductility of cast steel from chemical composition and thermal conditions. Met Mater Int 27:298–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00713-w10.1007/s12540-020-00713-w ↗
25. Yan F, Song K, Liu Y, Chen S, Chen J (2020) Predictions and mechanism analyses of the fatigue strength of steel based on machine learning. J Mater Sci 55:15334–15349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05091-710.1007/s10853-020-05091-7 ↗
26. Jeon J, Seo N, Son SB, Lee S-J, Jung M (2021) Application of machine learning algorithms and SHAP for prediction and feature analysis of tempered martensite hardness in low–alloy steels. Metals 11:1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1108115910.3390/met11081159 ↗
27. Lundberg SM, Lee SI (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. NIPS, Long Beach
28. Shapley LS (1951) Notes on the N–person game II: the value of an N–person game. Technical Report for U.S. Air Force, Santa Monica
29. Bhadeshia HKDH, Honeycombe R (2006) Steels: microstructure and properties. Elsevier, Oxford
30. Kim K, Lee SJ (2017) Effect of Ni addition on the mechanical behavior of quenching and partitioning (Q&P) steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A 698:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.05.03010.1016/j.msea.2017.05.030 ↗