Strengthening mechanisms in nanoporous alloy foams with a hierarchical structure
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanoporous metallic foams (NMFs) of Cu, Cu–Zn, and Cu–Ni alloys with relative densities between 0.5 and 14% were created by polymer templating followed by thermal treatments for calcination and reduction. The mechanical strength of NMFs can be dominated by chemistry and morphological parameters, including the relative density, ligament size, and chemistry. An analysis by Pearson correlation coefficients found the predominant factors in the strength, as measured with nanoindentation, of the alloys NMFs were largely controlled by the relative density. The modulus of a Cu75Ni25 alloy with a relative density of 14% was 57% greater and its hardness was 64% greater than the same alloy with a 0.5% relative density. When foams with similar ligament size and relative density but different chemistries were compared, second phase particles in the form of ZnO in Cu–Zn alloys strengthened NMFs alloys significantly more than solid solution strengthening in Cu–Zn or Cu–Ni alloys. This suggests solid solution strengthening will have limited effectiveness in increasing the strength of NMFs, and precipitation hardening should be more impactful in creating stronger NMFs.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoporous metals and alloys · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Parlett CMA, Wilson K, Lee AF (2013) Hierarchical porous materials: catalytic applications. Chem Soc Rev 42:3876–3893. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35378D10.1039/C2CS35378D ↗
2. Sun B, McCay RN, Goswami S et al (2018) Gas-permeable, multifunctional on-skin electronics based on laser-induced porous graphene and sugar-templated elastomer sponges. Adv Mater 30:1804327. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180432710.1002/adma.201804327 ↗
3. Kim C-E, Rahimi RM, Hightower N et al (2018) Synthesis, microstructure, and mechanical properties of polycrystalline Cu nano-foam. MRS Adv 3:469–475. https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2018.12810.1557/adv.2018.128 ↗
4. Aricò AS, Bruce P, Scrosati B et al (2010) Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. In: Dusastre V (ed) Materials for sustainable energy. Macmillan Publishers Ltd, London, pp 148–15910.1142/9789814317665_0022 ↗
5. Tappan BC, Steiner SA, Luther EP (2010) Nanoporous metal foams. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:4544–4565. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20090299410.1002/anie.200902994 ↗
6. Rouquerol J, Avnir D, Fairbridge CW et al (1994) Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (technical report). Pure Appl Chem 66:1739–1758. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac19946608173910.1351/pac199466081739 ↗
7. Zhao F (2016) Effects of porosity on shock-induced melting of honeycomb-shaped Cu nanofoams. In: APS Meeting Abstracts10.1063/1.4926785 ↗
8. Lu GQM, Zhao XS (2004) Nanoporous materials: science and engineering. World Scientific10.1142/p181 ↗
9. Anwajler B (2022) The thermal properties of a prototype insulation with a gyroid structure—optimization of the structure of a cellular composite made using SLS printing technology. Materials (Basel) 15:135210.3390/ma15041352 ↗
10. Kaur G, Pulagara NV, Kumar R, Lahiri I (2020) Metal foam-carbon nanotube-reduced graphene oxide hierarchical structures for efficient field emission. Diam Relat Mater 106:107847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2020.10784710.1016/j.diamond.2020.107847 ↗
11. Mauret P, Alphonse P (1982) Preparation and catalytic properties of finely divided nickel obtained by reduction of nickel halide in tetrahydrofuran or ethanol. J Org Chem 47:3322–3323. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00138a02410.1021/jo00138a024 ↗
12. Ben Mbarek W, Pineda E, Escoda L et al (2018) Dealloying of Cu–Mg–Ca alloys. Metals (Basel) 8:919. https://doi.org/10.3390/met811091910.3390/met8110919 ↗
13. Ke H, Loaiza A, Jimenez A et al (2022) A multiscale simulation approach for the mechanical response of copper/nickel nanofoams with experimental validation. J Eng Mater Technol. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.405180610.1115/1.4051806 ↗
14. Li W-C, Balk TJ (2010) Achieving finer pores and ligaments in nanoporous palladium–nickel thin films. Scr Mater 62:167–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.10.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.10.009 ↗
15. Cheng I-C, Hodge AM (2013) Strength scale behavior of nanoporous Ag, Pd and Cu foams. Scr Mater 69:295–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2013.04.02310.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2013.04.023 ↗
16. Schuh CA (2006) Nanoindentation studies of materials. Mater Today 9:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71495-X10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71495-X ↗
17. Oyen ML, Cook RF (2009) A practical guide for analysis of nanoindentation data. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2:396–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.10.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.10.002 ↗
18. Begau C, Hartmaier A, George EP, Pharr GM (2011) Atomistic processes of dislocation generation and plastic deformation during nanoindentation. Acta Mater 59:934–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.01610.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.016 ↗
19. Fu G (2004) On the fundamental relations used in the analysis of nanoindentation data. J Mater Sci 39:745–746. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000011547.59966.e410.1023/B:JMSC.0000011547.59966.e4 ↗
20. Pharr GM, Oliver WC (1992) Measurement of thin film mechanical properties using nanoindentation. MRS Bull 17:28–33. https://doi.org/10.1557/S088376940004163410.1557/S0883769400041634 ↗
21. Blair GWS, Hening JC, Wagstaff A (1939) The flow of cream through narrow glass tubes. J Phys Chem 43:853–864. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150394a00410.1021/j150394a004 ↗
22. Wickham H (2009) Elegant graphics for data analysis-ggplot2. Springer-Verlag, New York10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 ↗
23. Subbiah T, Bhat GS, Tock RW et al (2005) Electrospinning of nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 96:557–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2148110.1002/app.21481 ↗
24. Nezarati RM, Eifert MB, Cosgriff-Hernandez E (2013) Effects of humidity and solution viscosity on electrospun fiber morphology. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 19:810–819. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2012.067110.1089/ten.tec.2012.0671 ↗
25. Deitzel J, Kleinmeyer J, Harris D, Beck TN (2001) The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer (Guildf) 42:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00250-010.1016/S0032-3861(00)00250-0 ↗
26. Megelski S, Stephens JS, Chase DB, Rabolt JF (2002) Micro- and nanostructured surface morphology on electrospun polymer fibers. Macromolecules 35:8456–8466. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma020444a10.1021/ma020444a ↗
27. Juarez T, Biener J, Weissmüller J, Hodge AM (2017) Nanoporous metals with structural hierarchy: a review. Adv Eng Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20170038910.1002/adem.201700389 ↗
28. McCue I, Benn E, Gaskey B, Erlebacher J (2016) Dealloying and dealloyed materials. Annu Rev Mater Res 46:263–286. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03173910.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031739 ↗
29. Yang X-Y, Chen L-H, Li Y et al (2017) Hierarchically porous materials: synthesis strategies and structure design. Chem Soc Rev 46:481–558. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00829A10.1039/C6CS00829A ↗
30. Kim C-E, Rahimi RM, Bahr DF (2020) The structure and mechanical properties of Cu50Ni50 alloy nanofoams formed via polymeric templating. MRS Commun 10:286–291. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2020.1610.1557/mrc.2020.16 ↗
31. Hakamada M, Mabuchi M (2007) Mechanical strength of nanoporous gold fabricated by dealloying. Scr Mater 56:1003–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2007.01.04610.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2007.01.046 ↗
32. Simmons G (1965) Single crystal elastic constants and calculated aggregate properties. SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIV DALLAS TEX. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD0615727.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2021
33. Lakes R (1987) Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science (80-) 235:1038–1040. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4792.103810.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
34. Mayers MA, Chawla KK (1994) Mechanical metallurgy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
35. Pilliar RM (2021) Metallic biomaterials. In: Narayan R (ed) Biomedical materials. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–47
36. Shan S, Yong L, Bao-Nam N-D et al (2021) Scaling behavior of stiffness and strength of hierarchical network nanomaterials. Science (80-) 371:1026–1033. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd939110.1126/science.abd9391 ↗
37. Jin H-J, Kurmanaeva L, Schmauch J et al (2009) Deforming nanoporous metal: role of lattice coherency. Acta Mater 57:2665–2672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.01710.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.017 ↗
38. Zhao M, Issa I, Pfeifenberger MJ et al (2020) Tailoring ultra-strong nanocrystalline tungsten nanofoams by reverse phase dissolution. Acta Mater 182:215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.10.03010.1016/j.actamat.2019.10.030 ↗
39. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press
40. Ashby M (2006) The properties of foams and lattices. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 364:15–30. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.167810.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
41. Wang L, Lau J, Thomas EL, Boyce MC (2011) Co-continuous composite materials for stiffness, strength, and energy dissipation. Adv Mater 23:1524–1529. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20100395610.1002/adma.201003956 ↗
42. Hodge AM, Doucette RT, Biener MM et al (2009) Ag effects on the elastic modulus values of nanoporous Au foams. J Mater Res 24:1600–1606. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2009.018410.1557/jmr.2009.0184 ↗
43. Sallica-Leva E, da Costa FH, Dos Santos CT et al (2021) Microstructure and mechanical properties of hierarchical porous parts of Ti–6Al–4V alloy obtained by powder bed fusion techniques. Rapid Prototyp J ahead-of-p: https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2021-007810.1108/RPJ-04-2021-0078 ↗
44. Mathur A, Erlebacher J (2007) Size dependence of effective Young’s modulus of nanoporous gold. Appl Phys Lett 90:61910. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.243671810.1063/1.2436718 ↗