Enhancement of the low-temperature catalytic graphitization of polyacrylonitrile by incorporating Cu nanostructures as plasmonic photocatalyst
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Lu J, Li W, Kang H et al (2020) Microstructure and properties of polyacrylonitrile based carbon fibers. Polym Test 81:106267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10626710.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106267 ↗
2. Barton BE, Behr MJ, Patton JT et al (2017) High-modulus low-cost carbon fibers from polyethylene enabled by boron catalyzed graphitization. Small 13:1701926. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20170192610.1002/smll.201701926 ↗
3. Chen L, Fang T, Song C et al (2021) Catalytic graphitization of boron on the fabrication of high-performance carbon papers for gas diffusion layers in PEMFCs. Catal Commun 157:106332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2021.10633210.1016/j.catcom.2021.106332 ↗
4. He D, Zhang F, Xu S et al (2008) Synergistic catalytic effect of Ti–B on the graphitization of polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fibers. Carbon 46:1506–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2008.06.04310.1016/j.carbon.2008.06.043 ↗
5. Zhang H, Wei J, Zhang X-G et al (2020) Plasmon-induced interfacial hot-electron transfer directly probed by Raman spectroscopy. Chem 6:689–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2019.12.01510.1016/j.chempr.2019.12.015 ↗
6. Cong S, Liu X, Jiang Y et al (2020) Surface enhanced raman scattering revealed by interfacial charge-transfer transitions. Innovation 1:100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.10005110.1016/j.xinn.2020.100051 ↗
7. Zhao LB, Zhang M, Huang YF et al (2014) Theoretical study of plasmon-enhanced surface catalytic coupling reactions of aromatic amines and nitro compounds. J Phys Chem Lett 5:1259. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz500334610.1021/jz5003346 ↗
8. Bhattacharya C, Saji SE, Mohan A et al (2020) Sustainable nanoplasmon-enhanced photoredox reactions: synthesis, characterization, and applications. Adv Energy Mater 10:2002402. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20200240210.1002/aenm.202002402 ↗
9. Linic S, Aslam U, Boerigter C et al (2015) Photochemical transformations on plasmonic metal nanoparticles. Nat Mater 14:567–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat428110.1038/nmat4281 ↗
10. Zhang Z, Xu P, Yang X et al (2016) Surface plasmon-driven photocatalysis in ambient, aqueous and high-vacuum monitored by SERS and TERS. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 27:100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2016.04.00110.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2016.04.001 ↗
11. Kazuma E, Kim Y (2019) Mechanistic studies of plasmon chemistry on metal catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 58:4800–4808. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20181123410.1002/anie.201811234 ↗
12. Huang C, Jevric M, Borges A et al (2017) Single-molecule detection of dihydroazulene photo-thermal reaction using break junction technique. Nat Commun 8:15436. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1543610.1038/ncomms15436 ↗
13. Robatjazi H, Zhao H, Swearer DF et al (2017) Plasmon-induced selective carbon dioxide conversion on earth-abundant aluminum-cuprous oxide antenna-reactor nanoparticles. Nat Commun 8:27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00055-z10.1038/s41467-017-00055-z ↗
14. Wu K, Chen J, McBride JR (2015) Efficient hot-electron transfer by a plasmon-induced interfacial charge-transfer transition. Science 349:632–635. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac544310.1126/science.aac5443 ↗
15. Adriana IH, Alejandro VR, Velia O (2018) Synthesis of graphite oxide with different surface oxygen contents assisted microwave radiation. Nanomaterials 8:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano802010610.3390/nano8020106 ↗
16. Liu Z, Hou W, Pavaskar P et al (2011) Plasmon resonant enhancement of photocatalytic water splitting under visible illumination. Nano Lett 11:1111–1116. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl104005n10.1021/nl104005n ↗
17. Sun M, Xu H (2012) A novel application of plasmonics: plasmon-driven surface-catalyzed reactions. Small 8:2777–2786. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20120057210.1002/smll.201200572 ↗
18. Zhang P, Liu H, Li X (2021) Photo-reduction synthesis of Cu nanoparticles as plasmon-driven non-semiconductor photocatalyst for overall water splitting. Appl Surf Sci 535:147720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14772010.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147720 ↗
19. Hu C, Chen X, Jin J et al (2019) Surface plasmon enabling nitrogen fixation in pure water through a dissociative mechanism under mild conditions. J Am Chem Soc 141:7807–7814. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b0137510.1021/jacs.9b01375 ↗
20. Yao GY, Zhao ZY, Liu QL et al (2020) Theoretical calculations for localized surface plasmon resonance effects of Cu/TiO2 nanosphere: generation, modulation, and application in photocatalysis. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 208:110385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11038510.1016/j.solmat.2019.110385 ↗
21. Gawande MB, Goswami A, Felpin FX et al (2016) Cu and Cu-based nanoparticles: synthesis and applications in catalysis. Chem Rev 116:3722–3811. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0048210.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00482 ↗
22. Babar S, Weaver JH (2015) Optical constants of Cu, Ag, and Au revisited. Appl Opt 54:477. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.54.00047710.1364/ao.54.000477 ↗
23. Brimhall N, Herrick N, Allred DD et al (2010) Measured optical constants of copper from 10 nm to 35 nm. Opt Express 17:23873–23879. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.02387310.1364/OE.17.023873 ↗
24. Xu K, Zhou R, Takei K et al (2019) Toward flexible Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) sensors for point-of-care diagnostics. Adv Sci 6:1900925. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20190092510.1002/advs.201900925 ↗
25. Schranghamer TF, Oberoi A, Das S (2020) Graphene memristive synapses for high precision neuromorphic computing. Nat Commun 11:5474. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19203-z10.1038/s41467-020-19203-z ↗
26. Shao X, Srinivasan A, Ang WK et al (2018) A high-brightness large-diameter graphene coated point cathode field emission electron source. Nat Commun 9:1288. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03721-y10.1038/s41467-018-03721-y ↗
27. Nidhankar AD, Goudappagouda WVC et al (2021) Efficient metal-free organic room temperature phosphors. Chem Sci 12:4216–4236. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1sc00446h10.1039/d1sc00446h ↗
28. Sakamoto M, Kawawaki T, Kimura M et al (2019) Clear and transparent nanocrystals for infrared-responsive carrier transfer. Nat Commun 10:406. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08226-210.1038/s41467-018-08226-2 ↗
29. Christopher P, Xin H, Linic S (2011) Visible-light-enhanced catalytic oxidation reactions on plasmonic silver nanostructures. Nat Chem 3:467–472. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.103210.1038/nchem.1032 ↗
30. Christopher P, Moskovits M (2017) Hot charge carrier transmission from plasmonic nanostructures. Annu Rev Phys Chem 68:379–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-052516-04494810.1146/annurev-physchem-052516-044948 ↗
31. Zhang Z, Zhang C, Zheng H et al (2019) Plasmon-driven catalysis on molecules and nanomaterials. Acc Chem Res 52:2506–2515. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b0022410.1021/acs.accounts.9b00224 ↗
32. Li B, Zhou L, Wu D et al (2011) Photochemical chlorination of graphene. ACS Nano 5:5957–5961. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn201731t10.1021/nn201731t ↗
33. Jiang Z, Sun W, Miao W et al (2019) Living atomically dispersed Cu ultrathin TiO2 nanosheet CO2 reduction photocatalyst. Adv Sci 6:1900289. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20190028910.1002/advs.201900289 ↗
34. Lyu Z, Xie M, Aldama E et al (2019) Au@Cu core-shell nanocubes with controllable sizes in the range of 20–30 nm for applications in catalysis and plasmonics. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2:1533–1540. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b0001610.1021/acsanm.9b00016 ↗
35. Manjavacas A, Liu JG, Kulkarni V et al (2014) Plasmon-induced hot carriers in metallic nanoparticles. ACS Nano 8:7630–7638. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn502445f10.1021/nn502445f ↗
36. Zheng BY, Zhao H, Manjavacas A et al (2015) Distinguishing between plasmon-induced and photoexcited carriers in a device geometry. Nat Commun 6:7797. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms879710.1038/ncomms8797 ↗