Toward the design of robust multilayer graphene: mechanistic understanding of the role played by interlayer interactions
Source abstract
Abstract
In the literature, while the mechanical responses of multilayer graphene have been investigated during uniaxial tensile stretch and nanoindentation tests, fundamental mechanisms for the effects of the number of layers (non-bonded interlayer interactions) are rarely explored and discussed. In this work, a series of molecular dynamics simulations was performed to bridge this gap. Our results revealed that for graphene samples under tensile stretch, stress–strain relations and Young’s moduli were insensitive to both the interlayer interactions and the number of graphene layers. Contrarily, during nanoindentation tests, layer thicknesses as well as interlayer interactions, play significant roles in determining the force–displacement curves, and thus Young’s moduli of multilayer graphene. Through analyzing strain distributions, the underlying mechanisms for these observations were proposed. While interlayer interactions have insignificant effects on the distribution of normal strains, they can initiate “strain shielding” for the distribution of shear strains. Hybrids of graphene/boron nitride sheets were then built as demonstrations to further validate these findings. The results obtained here not only provide fundamental insights into the role of interlayer interactions, but also shed lights on the design of mechanically robust multilayer graphene.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · 2D Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Nieto A, Bisht A, Lahiri D et al (2017) Graphene reinforced metal and ceramic matrix composites: a review. Int Mater Rev 62:241–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2016.121948110.1080/09506608.2016.1219481 ↗
2. Mittal G, Dhand V, Rhee KY et al (2015) A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem 21:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.02210.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.022 ↗
3. Patil SP (2019) Nanoindentation of graphene-reinforced silica aerogel: a molecular dynamics study. Molecules 24:1336–1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2407133610.3390/molecules24071336 ↗
4. Moeini M, Barbaz Isfahani R, Saber-Samandari S, Aghdam MM (2020) Molecular dynamics simulations of the effect of temperature and strain rate on mechanical properties of graphene–epoxy nanocomposites. Mol Simul 46:476–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2020.172998310.1080/08927022.2020.1729983 ↗
5. Najafi F, Wang G, Mukherjee S et al (2020) Toughening of graphene-based polymer nanocomposites via tuning chemical functionalization. Compos Sci Technol 194:108140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10814010.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108140 ↗
6. Li M, Zhou H, Zhang Y et al (2017) The effect of defects on the interfacial mechanical properties of graphene/epoxy composites. RSC Adv 7:46101–46108. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra08243f10.1039/c7ra08243f ↗
7. Li J, Zhao J, Ren P et al (2019) Effects of temperature, strain rate and molecule length on the deformation of graphene/polyethylene composites: A molecular dynamics simulation. Chem Phys Lett 726:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.04.03710.1016/j.cplett.2019.04.037 ↗
8. Georgantzinos SK, Giannopoulos GI, Anifantis NK (2010) Numerical investigation of elastic mechanical properties of graphene structures. Mater Des 31:4646–4654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.03610.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.036 ↗
9. Zhong T, Li J, Zhang K (2019) A molecular dynamics study of Young’s modulus of multilayer graphene. J Appl Phys 125:175110. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.509175310.1063/1.5091753 ↗
10. Papageorgiou DG, Kinloch IA, Young RJ (2017) Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci 90:75–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 ↗
11. Dewapriya MAN, Srikantha Phani A, Rajapakse RKND (2013) Influence of temperature and free edges on the mechanical properties of graphene. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 21:065017. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/21/6/06501710.1088/0965-0393/21/6/065017 ↗
12. Hosseini Kordkheili SA, Moshrefzadeh-Sani H (2013) Mechanical properties of double-layered graphene sheets. Comput Mater Sci 69:335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.02710.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.027 ↗
13. Zhang YY, Gu YT (2013) Mechanical properties of graphene: effects of layer number, temperature and isotope. Comput Mater Sci 71:197–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.01.03210.1016/j.commatsci.2013.01.032 ↗
14. Fan N, Ren Z, Jing G et al (2017) Numerical investigation of the fracture mechanism of defective graphene sheets. Materials (Basel) 10:164–176. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1002016410.3390/ma10020164 ↗
15. Zhang Y, Pan C (2012) Measurements of mechanical properties and number of layers of graphene from nano-indentation. Diam Relat Mater 24:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2012.01.03310.1016/j.diamond.2012.01.033 ↗
16. Neek-Amal M, Peeters FM (2010) Nanoindentation of a circular sheet of bilayer graphene. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter Mater Phys 81:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.23542110.1103/PhysRevB.81.235421 ↗
17. Falin A, Cai Q, Santos EJG et al (2017) Mechanical properties of atomically thin boron nitride and the role of interlayer interactions. Nat Commun 8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1581510.1038/ncomms15815 ↗
18. Muniz AR, Machado AS, Maroudas D (2015) Mechanical behavior of interlayer-bonded nanostructures obtained from bilayer graphene. Carbon N Y 81:663–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.00310.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.003 ↗
19. Zhang YY, Wang CM, Cheng Y, Xiang Y (2011) Mechanical properties of bilayer graphene sheets coupled by sp3 bonding. Carbon N Y 49:4511–4517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.05810.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.058 ↗
20. Machado AS, Maroudas D, Muniz AR (2013) Tunable mechanical properties of diamond superlattices generated by interlayer bonding in twisted bilayer graphene. Appl Phys Lett 103:013113. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481327110.1063/1.4813271 ↗
21. Kumar S, Parks DM (2015) Strain shielding from mechanically activated covalent bond formation during nanoindentation of graphene delays the onset of failure. Nano Lett 15:1503–1510. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl503641c10.1021/nl503641c ↗
22. Li Y, Zhang W, Guo B, Datta D (2017) Interlayer shear of nanomaterials: Graphene–graphene, boron nitride–boron nitride and graphene–boron nitride. Acta Mech Solida Sin 30:234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camss.2017.05.00210.1016/j.camss.2017.05.002 ↗
23. Hosseini E, Zakertabrizi M, Habibnejad Korayem A, Shahsavari R (2019) Tunable, multifunctional ceramic composites via intercalation of fused graphene boron nitride nanosheets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:8635–8644. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1940910.1021/acsami.8b19409 ↗
24. Ding N, Chen X, Wu CML (2016) Mechanical properties and failure behaviors of the interface of hybrid graphene/hexagonal boron nitride sheets. Sci Rep 6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3149910.1038/srep31499 ↗
25. Borodich FM, Galanov BA (2016) Contact probing of stretched membranes and adhesive interactions: graphene and other two-dimensional materials. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 472:20160550. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.055010.1098/rspa.2016.0550 ↗
26. Niu T, Cao G, Xiong C (2018) Indentation behavior of the stiffest membrane mounted on a very compliant substrate: graphene on PDMS. Int J Solids Struct 132–133:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.05.03810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.05.038 ↗
27. Cao C, Daly M, Singh CV et al (2015) High strength measurement of monolayer graphene oxide. Carbon N Y 81:497–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.08210.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.082 ↗
28. Stuart SJ, Tutein AB, Harrison JA (2000) A reactive potential for hydrocarbons with intermolecular interactions. J Chem Phys 112:6472–6486. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.48120810.1063/1.481208 ↗
29. Wang X, Ramírez-Hinestrosa S, Dobnikar J, Frenkel D (2020) The Lennard-Jones potential: when (not) to use it. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22:10624–10633. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cp05445f10.1039/c9cp05445f ↗
30. Tersoff J (1989) Modeling solid-state chemistry: interatomic potentials for multicomponent systems. Phys Rev B 39:5566–5568. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.39.556610.1103/PhysRevB.39.5566 ↗
31. Lee JH (2006) A study on a boron-nitride nanotube as a gigahertz oscillator. J Korean Phys Soc 49:172–176
32. Hollingsworth SA, Dror RO (2018) Molecular dynamics simulation for all. Neuron 99:1129–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.01110.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.011 ↗
33. Fan Y, Cao P (2019) Long time-scale atomistic modeling and simulation of deformation and flow in solids. In: Handbook of materials modeling. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–2710.1007/978-3-319-50257-1_150-1 ↗
34. Hoover GW (1985) Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A 31:1695–1697. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
35. Hoover WG (1986) Constant-pressure equations of motion. Phys Rev A 34:2499–2500. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.34.249910.1103/PhysRevA.34.2499 ↗
36. Kryuchkov NP, Yurchenko SO, Fomin YD et al (2018) Complex crystalline structures in a two-dimensional core-softened system. Soft Matter 14:2152–2162. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7sm02429k10.1039/c7sm02429k ↗
37. Stukowski A (2010) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the open visualization tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
38. Tan X, Wu J, Zhang K et al (2013) Nanoindentation models and Young’s modulus of monolayer graphene: a molecular dynamics study. Appl Phys Lett 102:071908. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.479319110.1063/1.4793191 ↗
39. Jin C (2017) Comment on “Nanoindentation models and Young’s modulus of monolayer graphene: a molecular dynamics study.” Appl Phys Lett 110:176101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.498222610.1063/1.4982226 ↗
40. Begley MR, Mackin TJ (2004) Spherical indentation of freestanding circular thin films in the membrane regime. J Mech Phys Solids 52:2005–2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.00210.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.002 ↗
41. Liu A, Peng Q (2018) A molecular dynamics study of the mechanical properties of twisted bilayer graphene. Micromachines 9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi909044010.3390/mi9090440 ↗