Mechanical properties and area retention of leather dried with biaxial stretching under vacuum
Source abstract
Abstract
The conversion of animal hides to leather involves many complicated chemical and mechanical operations. Drying is one of the mechanical operations, and plays a key role in determining the physical properties of leather. It is where leather acquires its final texture, consistency, and flexibility. We have investigated a drying method using a combination of vacuum and biaxial stretching. Total area loss often accompanies drying of leather; however, by adding a stretching action during vacuum drying one may significantly increase the area retention and dimensional stability. Moreover, this method is particularly advantageous to heat-vulnerable organic tanned leathers because vacuum drying offers fast moisture removal at a low temperature. We investigated this dual functional drying method and observed how drying variables affected the mechanical properties and area retention of chrome-free leather. We used a central composite experimental design to formulate the relationship between drying variables and resultant leather properties into second-order polynomial equations. Results showed that the stretching applied in a drying operation significantly affects mechanical properties, area retention, and thickness of leather. Moreover, studies showed that biaxial stretching increased the tensile strength but had less effect on fracture energy. A significant area increase of 16% can be achieved by using this combined drying (vacuum plus stretching) method compared to the regular vacuum dried leather without stretching.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Collagen: Extraction and Characterization · Textile materials and evaluations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Fein ML, Harris EH Jr, Naghski J, Filachione EM (1959) JALCA 54:488
2. Filachione EM, Fein ML, Harris EH Jr, Luvisi FP, Korn AH, Windus W, Naghski J (1959) JALCA 54:668
3. Fein ML, Filachione EM, Naghski J, Harris EH Jr (1963) JALCA 58:202
4. Filachione EM, Fein ML, Harris EH Jr (1964) JALCA 59:378
5. Filachione EM, Fein ML, Harris EH Jr (1964) JALCA 59:281
6. Palop R (2003) Leather Int May:27
7. Schwaiger W (2001) Leather Int July:28
8. Fennen J (2003) In: 99th ALCA annual meeting, Greensboro, NC, June 19–22, 2003
9. Laplime DJ, Ouellette DG, Powell DL, Rodden KJ, Sgarp BW (1994) In: Leather facts, 3rd edn. New England Tanners Club, Peabody, MA, p 21
10. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Lee J (2005) JALCA 100:8
11. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Cooke P (2006) JALCA 101:330
12. ASTM D2813 (1997) Standard practice for sampling leather for physical and chemical tests. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
13. Liu C-K, McClintick MD (1999) JALCA 94:8
14. Box GEP, Hunter JS (1957) Ann Math Stat 28:19510.1214/aoms/1177707047 ↗
15. Liu C-K, McClintick MD (1997) JALCA 92:157
16. Liu C-K, McClintick MD (1997) JALCA 92:103
17. Liu C-K, DiMaio GL (2000) JALCA 95:170
18. Liu C-K, Latona NP, DiMaio GL (2001) JALCA 96:367
19. Liu C-K, Latona NP (2002) J Mater Sci 37(18):3827. doi: 10.1023/A:101967871638910.1023/A:1019678716389 ↗
20. Liu C-K, Latona NP, DiMaio GL (2002) JALCA 97:389