Mill scale strengthened ABS composite filaments for 3D printing technology
Source abstract
Abstract
Recycling raw iron oxide mill scale formed on steel slabs during the hot rolling process is one way to reduce operating costs and increase steel mill revenue. This research utilized hot rolling mill by-products to fabricate low-cost sustainable raw material for use in 3D printing technology. Mill scale was recycled as iron oxide powder and used to reinforce 3D-printed acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) matrix composite filaments. Prepared mill scale powder was added to ABS composite filament at up to 1.0 vol% mill scale. Homogeneous fine mill scale particle dispersion in the ABS matrix was validated by 3D-reconstructed images of the cross-sectional composite filament by X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT). Moreover, the obtained images were further used to generate a finite element (FE) model for describing local stress distributions around the mill scale particles in the ABS matrix and predicted stress–strain curves were compared with the experimental results. High mechanical and thermal properties and printability of mill scale strengthened ABS composite were found for both as-filament and as-printed conditions. The thermal properties and stability of the polymer matrix composite (PMC) filament were similar to pure ABS. Tensile strength and impact absorbed energy of printed ABS composites increased when adding 1.0 vol% mill scale, in which a 45% increase of tensile strength could be reached. After failure, brittle fractures and many air gaps were found on edges of samples correlating well with the raster orientation.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Sajan S, Philip Selvaraj D (2021) A review on polymer matrix composite materials and their applications. Mater Today Proc 47:5493–5498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.03410.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.034 ↗
2. Kessler MR (2012) Polymer matrix composites: a perspective for a special issue of polymer reviews. Polym Rev 52:229–23310.1080/15583724.2012.708004 ↗
3. Hemath Kumar G, Babuvishwanath H, Purohit R, Sahu P, Rana RS (2017) Investigations on mechanical properties of glass and sugarcane fiber polymer matrix composites. Mater Today Proc 4:5408–5420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.05.05210.1016/j.matpr.2017.05.052 ↗
4. Benzait Z, Trabzon L (2018) A review of recent research on materials used in polymer–matrix composites for body armor application. J Compos Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831876400210.1177/0021998318764002 ↗
5. Cao D, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN, Ren Y, Liu Y, Nie X, Qian D, Griffith DT, Lu H (2022) The effect of resin uptake on the flexural properties of compression molded sandwich composites. Wind Energy. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.266110.1002/we.2661 ↗
6. Cao D, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN, Ren Y, Lu H (2021) Nanoindentation measurement of core–skin interphase viscoelastic properties in a sandwich glass composite. Mech Time Depend Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-020-09448-y10.1007/s11043-020-09448-y ↗
7. Gordelier TJ, Thies PR, Turner L, Johanning L (2019) Optimising the FDM additive manufacturing process to achieve maximum tensile strength: a state-of-the-art review. Rapid Prototyp J. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2018-018310.1108/RPJ-07-2018-0183 ↗
8. Solomon IJ, Sevvel P, Gunasekaran J (2021) A review on the various processing parameters in FDM. Mater Today Proc 37:509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.48410.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484 ↗
9. Zhang H, Wu Y, Wang K, Peng Y, Wang D, Yao S, Wang J (2020) Materials selection of 3D-printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites considering multiple criteria. Mater Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10914010.1016/j.matdes.2020.109140 ↗
10. Lee J, Lee H, Cheon K-H, Park C, Jang T-S, Kim H-E, Jung H-D (2019) Fabrication of poly(lactic acid)/Ti composite scaffolds with enhanced mechanical properties and biocompatibility via fused filament fabrication (FFF)–based 3D printing. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10088310.1016/j.addma.2019.100883 ↗
11. Venkatesh C, Fuenmayor E, Doran P, Major I, Lyons JG, Devine DM (2019) Additive manufacturing of PLA/HNT nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Proc Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.00310.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.003 ↗
12. Srinivas G, Raghunandana K, Satish Shenoy B (2018) Recent developments in turbomachinery component materials and manufacturing challenges for aero engine applications. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 314:012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/314/1/01201210.1088/1757-899X/314/1/012012 ↗
13. Kanabenja W, Passarapark K, Subchokpool T, Nawaaukkaratharnant N, Román AJ, Osswald TA, Aumnate C, Potiyaraj P (2022) 3D printing filaments from plasticized polyhydroxybutyrate/polylactic acid blends reinforced with hydroxyapatite. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10313010.1016/j.addma.2022.103130 ↗
14. Benchiheub O, Mechachti S, Serrai S, Khalifa MG (2010) Elaboration of iron powder from mill scale. J Mater Environ Sci 1(4):267–276
15. Umadevi T, Brahmacharyulu A, Karthik P, Mahapatra PC, Prabhu M, Ranjan M (2012) Recycling of steel plant mill scale via iron ore sintering plant. Ironmak Steelmak. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743281211Y.000000006310.1179/1743281211Y.0000000063 ↗
16. Balla VK, Kate KH, Satyavolu J, Singh P, Tadimeti JGD (2019) Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects. Compos B Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10695610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 ↗
17. Schirmeister CG, Hees T, Licht EH, Mülhaupt R (2019) 3D printing of high density polyethylene by fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.00310.1016/j.addma.2019.05.003 ↗
18. Kumar R, Singh R (2020) Application of nano porous materials for energy conservation and storage. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11278-010.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11278-0 ↗
19. Singh J, Chawla K, Singh R (2022) Applications of thermoplastic polymers in 3D printing. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820352-1.00010-910.1016/B978-0-12-820352-1.00010-9 ↗
20. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing/Ian Gibson, David Rosen, brent stucker. Springer, NY10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 ↗
21. Wei X, Li D, Jiang W, Gu Z, Wang X, Zhang Z, Sun Z (2015) 3D printable graphene composite. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1118110.1038/srep11181 ↗
22. Aumnate C, Pongwisuthiruchte A, Pattananuwat P, Potiyaraj P (2018) Fabrication of ABS/graphene oxide composite filament for fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printing. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/283043710.1155/2018/2830437 ↗
23. Aqzna SS, Yeoh CK, Idris MS, Teh PL, Bin Hamzah KA, Aw YY, Atiqah TN (2018) Effect of different filler content of ABS-zinc ferrite composites on mechanical, electrical and thermal conductivity by using 3D printing. J Vinyl Addit Technol 24:E217–E221. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.2164010.1002/vnl.21640 ↗
24. Tian J, Xu R, He H, Feng Y (2017) Influence of ZnO filler size on the nonlinear electrical properties of ZnO ceramic-epoxy composite material. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:5102–5105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-6165-y10.1007/s10854-016-6165-y ↗
25. Abeykoon C, Sri-Amphorn P, Fernando A (2020) Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.00310.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003 ↗
26. Tan SH, Suk KL, Goak JC, Hong SC, Kim J-Y, Lee S-W, Kim S, Seo Y, Lee N (2010) Effect of poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) on multi-walled carbon nanotubes reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) composites. Polym Polym Compos 18:251–25610.1177/096739111001800502 ↗
27. Aqzna SS, Yeoh CK, Idris M, Teh PL, Amali HK, Aw YY (2019) The effect of different raster orientations of ABS—zinc ferrite composites on mechanical, electrical and thermal conductivity properties via 3D printer. Mater Today Proc 16:1804–1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.05410.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.054 ↗
28. Durgun I, Ertan R (2014) Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyp J. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2012-009110.1108/RPJ-10-2012-0091 ↗
29. Ramezani Dana H, Barbe F, Delbreilh L, Azzouna MB, Guillet A, Breteau T (2019) Polymer additive manufacturing of ABS structure: influence of printing direction on mechanical properties. J Manuf Process. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.06.01510.1016/j.jmapro.2019.06.015 ↗
30. Ajithkumar JP, Xavior MA (2021) Processing methods and property evaluation of CNT based metal matrix nano-composites. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11878-810.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11878-8 ↗
31. Sa’ude N, Ibrahim M, Ibrahim MHI (2013) Mechanical properties of highly filled iron-ABS composites in injection molding for FDM wire filament. MSF. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.773-774.44810.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.773-774.448 ↗
32. Hamzah KA, Yeoh CK, Noor MM, Teh PL, Aw YY, Sazali SA, Wan Ibrahim WMA (2022) Mechanical properties and thermal and electrical conductivity of 3D printed ABS-copper ferrite composites via 3D printing technique. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270571986940510.1177/0892705719869405 ↗
33. Wang X, Xu T, de Andrade MJ, Rampalli I, Cao D, Haque M, Roy S, Baughman RH, Lu H (2021) The interfacial shear strength of carbon nanotube sheet modified carbon fiber composites. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59542-5_410.1007/978-3-030-59542-5_4 ↗
34. Chawla N, Chawla KK (2006) Microstructure-based modeling of the deformation behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-6572-110.1007/s10853-006-6572-1 ↗
35. Balasivanandha Prabu S, Karunamoorthy L (2008) Microstructure-based finite element analysis of failure prediction in particle-reinforced metal–matrix composite. J Mater Process Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.07710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.077 ↗
36. Shah SP, Maiarù M (2021) Effect of manufacturing on the transverse response of polymer matrix composites. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1315249110.3390/polym13152491 ↗
37. Sombatmai A, Uthaisangsuk V, Wongwises S, Promoppatum P (2021) Multiscale investigation of the influence of geometrical imperfections, porosity, and size-dependent features on mechanical behavior of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V lattice struts. Mater Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10998510.1016/j.matdes.2021.109985 ↗
38. Waheed S, Cabot JM, Smejkal P, Farajikhah S, Sayyar S, Innis PC, Beirne S, Barnsley G, Lewis TW, Breadmore MC, Paull B (2019) Three-dimensional printing of abrasive, hard, and thermally conductive synthetic microdiamond-polymer composite using low-cost fused deposition modeling printer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1823210.1021/acsami.8b18232 ↗
39. Rytlewski P, Moraczewski K, Żenkiewicz M (2014) Effects of coffee on the stability of accelerated aged poly(acrylonitryle-butadiene-styrene). J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3988710.1002/app.39887 ↗
40. Qu Y, Yang Y, Zou Z, Zeilstra C, Meijer K, Boom R (2015) Melting and reduction behaviour of individual fine hematite ore particles. ISIJ Int. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.55.14910.2355/isijinternational.55.149 ↗
41. Chawla N, Chawla KK (2013) Metal matrix composites. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4614-9548-2 ↗
42. Hanemann T (2008) Influence of particle properties on the viscosity of polymer-alumina composites. Ceram Int 34:2099–210510.1016/j.ceramint.2007.08.007 ↗
43. Dieter GE, Bacon D (1988) Mechanical metallurgy. McGraw-Hill series in materials science and engineering. McGraw-Hill, London
44. Shanbhag G, Wheat E, Moylan S, Vlasea M (2021) Effect of specimen geometry and orientation on tensile properties of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by electron beam powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10236610.1016/j.addma.2021.102366 ↗
45. Gebisa AW, Lemu HG (2018) Investigating effects of fused-deposition modeling (FDM) processing parameters on flexural properties of ULTEM 9085 using designed experiment, Switzerland. Mater Basel 11:500. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1104050010.3390/ma11040500 ↗
46. Chicot D, Mendoza J, Zaoui A, Louis G, Lepingle V, Roudet F, Lesage J (2011) Mechanical properties of magnetite (Fe3O4), hematite (α-Fe2O3) and goethite (α-FeO·OH) by instrumented indentation and molecular dynamics analysis. Mater Chem Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.05.05610.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.05.056 ↗